Ben Groenland Ropa efu Amrka? Nanga wi taki Groenland?IpeGiki 18:40, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Well... Mi ben e denki taki a Amrka ben. Ma Danmarkkondre ben Ropa nanga Groenlandkondre ben wan koloni fu Danmarkkondre.Adfokati 17:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
eRopa, ben wan koloni fu Danmarkkondre nanga ben bi Islenikondre taki e Ropa ben. A ben no Groenlandkondre ma Grulenikondre.Grutu,Jordi (mi taki) 06:11, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Kliri. Libi wi disi ten sofa Ropa du nanga wan koloni fu Danmarkkondre nanga Grulenikondre.IpeGiki 08:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry voor het bemoeien, maar kunnen jullie niet beter het artikele ook daadwerkelijk eerst maken voor je de titel gaat bediskussiëren? -Markvondeegel 16:56, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Mee eens, maar ik heb er geen verstand van. 't Is natuurlijk wel handig eerst een titel voor je pagina te hebben. --Ooswesthoesbes 10:05, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Disi ben wan gu taki. HinduBRIBI!Grutu,Jordi (mi taki) 14:28, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Woordenboek? --Ooswesthoesbes 15:13, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Staat er niet in.Adfokati 06:12, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Mi e meni lekiSranan Wikipedia. Abra a stori, den masyin, den kenki, a interfesi nanga so pasa. Wan gu ide efru wan ogu ide?Pol-Sranan 19:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Yu kan fu mi parti, ma teki a neutraal. --Ooswesthoesbes 06:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Hu so onutrali? Disi e ben a Sranan Wikipedia!Pol-Sranan 14:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
WiliWikipedia wan ensiklopedi ben. Ensiklopedi e ben alaten nutrali skrifi. --Ooswesthoesbes 17:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Mi e ben dolehini fu den stub. Yu nanga wi si masyin kipi skopu stub, disi e benNO GU PEPREWOYSI. Ala nyunr stub sal trowe ben. --Grutu,Jordi (mi taki) 11:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Technical details:SieBot is an interwiki bot starting at any Wikipedia. The bot uses the pywikipedia framework and runs day and night in autonomous mode. Sometimes the bot will run in manual assisted mode to solve interwiki conflicts. It has made over 5 million edits since it started.Siebrand26 sik 2008 22:50 (UTC)[reageren]
Not done; a local bot flag is no longer needed. This is aglobal bot, and this wiki recently enabled global bots. —Pathoschild 09:18:51, 22 fosdri mun 2009 (UTC)
Not done; a local bot flag is no longer needed. This is aglobal bot, and this wiki recently enabled global bots. —Pathoschild 09:19:22, 22 fosdri mun 2009 (UTC)
Currently 42.10% of the MediaWiki messages and 0.47% of the messages of the extensions used by the Wikimedia Foundation projects have been localised. Please help us help your language by localising atBetawiki. This is therecent localisation activity for your language. Thanks,GerardM11 sey 2008 08:50 (UTC)[reageren]
Currently 43.87% of the MediaWiki messages and 0.44% of the messages of the extensions used by the Wikimedia Foundation projects have been localised. Please help us help your language by localising atBetawiki. This is therecent localisation activity for your language. Thanks,GerardM9 ayt 2008 14:24 (UTC)[reageren]
Currently 41.06% of the MediaWiki messages and 0.38% of the messages of the extensions used by the Wikimedia Foundation projects have been localised. Please help us help your language by localising atBetawiki. This is therecent localisation activity for your language. Thanks,GerardM11 ney 2008 10:27 (UTC)[reageren]
Currently 39.25% of the MediaWiki messages and 0.38% of the messages of the extensions used by the Wikimedia Foundation projects have been localised. Please help us help your language by localising atBetawiki. This is therecent localisation activity for your language. Thanks,GerardM18 tin 2008 09:47 (UTC)[reageren]
Currently 38.43% of the MediaWiki messages and 0.19% of the messages of the extensions used by the Wikimedia Foundation projects have been localised. Please help us help your language by localising and proof reading atBetawiki. This is therecent localisation activity for your language. Thanks,GerardM15 twa 2008 11:42 (UTC)[reageren]
Currently 37.99% of the MediaWiki messages and 0.19% of the messages of the extensions used by the Wikimedia Foundation projects have been localised. Please help us help your language by localising and proof reading atBetawiki. This is therecent localisation activity for your language. Thanks,GerardM12 wan 2009 21:00 (UTC)[reageren]
Hello. Thestandard bot policy was updated to allow global bots, which are now technically possible. These are trusted bots that will be given bot access on every wiki that allows global bots (the local policy or request page must explicitly allow them, or they won't get access on this wiki). Thecurrent requirements for global bots are:
a global bot must only maintain interlanguage links or fix double-redirects;
a global bot must have already been active on several wikis, with long-term contributions demonstrating its trustworthiness.
Does anyone object to allowing global bots on this wiki? I'll update the local policy in a week if there are no objections. Thanks.Carsrac15 dri 2009 00:03 (UTC)[reageren]
Implemented. —Pathoschild 08:49:50, 22 fosdri mun 2009 (UTC)
Hello. To facilitatesteward granting of bot access, I suggest implementing thestandard bot policy on this wiki. In particular, this policy allows stewards to automatically flag known interlanguage linking bots (if this page says that is acceptable), which form the vast majority of such requests. (The above proposal implemented global bots without the bot policy.)
This policy makes bot access requesting much easier for local users, operators, and stewards. To implement it we only need to create a redirect to this page fromProject:Bot policy, and add a line at the top noting that it is used here. Please read the text atm:Bot policy before commenting. If you object, please say so; I hope to implement it soon if there is no objection, since it is particularly written to streamline bot requests on wikis with little or no community interested in bot access requests. —Pathoschild 09:20:36, 22 fosdri mun 2009 (UTC)
Done. —Pathoschild 02:39:15, 29 fosdri mun 2009 (UTC)
The LocalisationUpdate extension is now enabled for all Wikimedia projects. From now on new localisations that become available in SVN will become available to your project within 24 hours. Your localisations get into SVN fromtranslatewiki.net typically within a day and at worst in two days. This is a huge improvement from the old practice where the localisations became available with new software. This could take weeks, even months.
The localisations done by our community at translatewiki.net are committed to SVN typically every day. When the system messages in English are the same as the local messages, they will now be inserted in a file and are available for use in all our projects in a timely manner
Local messages have an impact on the performance of our system. It is best when messages are as much as possible part of the system messages. In order to remove unnecessary duplication, all the messages that have a local localisation and areexactly the same as the system message will be removed. What we ask you to do is to compare and proof read the messages in translatewiki.net and the local messages. You can then either remove local messages when the translatewiki.net message is to be preferred or, you can update the message at translatewiki.net.
Messages that are specific to your project will have to stay as they are. You do want to check if the format and the variables of the message are still the same.
When you localise at translatewiki.net, your messages will be used in all Wikimedia projects and eventually in all MediaWiki based projects. This is how we provide the standard support for your language. When messages change, at translatewiki.net you will be prompted to revisit your translations. Localising is more efficient because we have innovated the process to make you more efficient; there is text explaining about messages and we have applied AJAX technology to reduce the number of clicks you have to make.
Currently 32.85% of the MediaWiki messages and 0.07% of the messages of the extensions used by the Wikimedia Foundation projects have been localised. Please help us help your language by localising and proof reading attranslatewiki.net. This is therecent localisation activity for your language. Thanks,GerardM30 ney 2009 18:32 (UTC)[reageren]
Currently 32.38% of the MediaWiki messages and 0.07% of the messages of the extensions used by the Wikimedia Foundation projects have been localised. Please help us help your language by localising and proof reading attranslatewiki.net. This is therecent localisation activity for your language. Thanks,GerardM1 erf 2009 16:05 (UTC)[reageren]
Currently 32.97% of the MediaWiki messages and 0.07% of the messages of the extensions used by the Wikimedia Foundation projects have been localised. Please help us help your language by localising and proof reading attranslatewiki.net. This is therecent localisation activity for your language. Thanks,GerardM14 twa 2009 13:19 (UTC)[reageren]
Currently 32.88% of the MediaWiki messages and 0.07% of the messages of the extensions used by the Wikimedia Foundation projects have been localised. Please help us help your language by localising and proof reading attranslatewiki.net. This is therecent localisation activity for your language. Thanks,GerardM18 wan 2010 16:01 (UTC)[reageren]
We expect that with the implementation of LocalisationUpdate the usability of MediaWiki for your language will improve. We are now ready to look at other aspects of usability for your language as well. There are two questions we would like you to answer:Are there issues with the new functionality of the Usability InitiativeDoes MediaWiki support your language properly
The best way to answer the first question is to visit the translatewiki.net. Change the language to your language, select the “vector” skin and add the advanced tool bar in in the preferences and check out the new functionality. And make some changes in your user page. When there is a need to improve on the localisation, please make thenecessary changess . It should update your localisation straight away. We would like you to report each issue individually athttp://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Usability_issues.
When there are problems with the support of MediaWiki for your language, we really want to know about this. It is best to report each issue separately. In this way there will be no large mass of issues to resolve but we can address each issue on its own. Consider issues with the display of characters, the presentation of your script, the position of the side bar, the combination of text with other languages, scripts. It is best to try this in an environment like the prototype wiki as it provides you with a clean, basic and up to date environment. The prototype wiki is available for five languages but you can select any of them, change the preferences to your language and test out MediaWiki for your language.
We would like you to report each issue individually athttp://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Language_issues. The issues you raise will all be assessed. It is important to keep each issue separate, because this will make it easier to understand the issues and find solutions.
This is the first multilingual Wikipedia collaboration. All Wikipedians can take part, in any Wikipedia language. The challenge runs from 1 May until 3 September 2011. Sign up now! " Wikipedia is particularly pleased to see that Derby Museums are encouraging the creation of articles in languages other than English." (Jimmy Wales, 14 January 2011)
Function Summary: Interwiki, Internationalization by removing chaos in Babel-Category so it can be used properly and easy. Double redirects will be added shortly
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Yes: 31 Wikis so far, others pending.see here
Function Details: just using the standard interwiki.py; parameters: -auto -all - log -catr
I humbly request bot status on this wiki in order to update Interwiki, and improve Internationalization by removing chaos in Babel so it can be used properly and easy by everyone.
The Wikimedia Foundation has brought together a new team of developers who are dedicated to language support. This team is to support all the languages and consequently it is not realistic to expect that the team members can provide proper support for your language. It is for this reason that we are looking for volunteers who will make up alanguage support team.
This language support team will be asked to provide us with information about their language. Such information may need to be provided either to us or on a website that we will indicate to you. Another activity will be to test software that will likely have an effect on the running of the MediaWiki software. We are looking for people who clearly identify their ability. Formal knowledge is definitely appreciated.
I apologize if this message is not in your language. Please help translate it.
The Catalan-speaking world... Want to find out more? From March 16 to April 15 we will organise theCatalan Culture Challenge, a Wikipedia editing contest in which victory will go to those who start and improve the greatest number of articles about 50 key figures of Catalan culture. You can take part by creating or expanding articles on these people in your native language (or any other one you speak). It would be lovely to have you on board.:-)
Hello and sorry for writing in English. Can anyone help me translate a small article (2 paragraphs) from English to your language and create the article in your wiki? Please, fell free to answer in my talk page in your wiki anytime. Thanks!Xaris333 (overleg)13 ayt 2014 02:38 (UTC)[reageren]
Wikimedia España invites you to join the Monuments of Spain Challenge. And what’s that? It’s a contest. You have to edit, translate or expand articles about the Spanish monuments and you will be granted points. So you’re not just writing about wonderful buildings: you can get prizes!
The time of the contest will include all October and any information you may need isright here.
Join in and good luck!
PS: We would be grateful if you could translate this note into Sranangtongo.
Hello, Dear wikipedians. I invite you to edit and improve this article and to add information about your and other country.--Kaiyr (overleg)31 tin 2014 12:48 (UTC)[reageren]
Sorry for using English here, but can anyone please tell me that why the Collection extension is disabled here? I recently foundthe InitialiseSettings.php (under 'wmgUseCollection' section), nearly all wikis that disabled this extension are due to either LanguageConverter or Chinese script compatibility issues. However, both issues are unlikely to be related to this language (IMHO), so should we re-enable it here? --Liuxinyu970226 (overleg)12 erf 2016 03:10 (UTC)[reageren]
Hi! I'm sorry for writing in English, but I'm as of yet not a speaker of sranantongo. I'm currently looking things over here for a bit, and found the two articlesSurinaamsewoorden andCombowortu. Most importantly, they don't seem to be regular Wikipedia articles about a well-defined topic expected to be a topic in an encyclopedia.
I'd therefore suggest that we either:
move the pages to sub-pages of the user (Masyin:Brewster/Surinaamsewoorden and Masyin:Brewster/Combowortu), as sandbox pages, so to speak.
create a language workshop/lab out of the two pages, in the wikipedia namespace.
(And then delete the redirects because there shouldn't be redirectes between the article namespace and others.) But I'm not allowed to move pages afai can see, so someone who are allowed would need to do that.
Also:grieken has extremely little substantial information (one sentence), and.. am I wrong, or is half of the text in Dutch? What to do? Move to sandbox too?Flinga (overleg)18 fo 2017 11:56 (UTC)[reageren]
The Wikidata development team is about to deploy a new feature on all Wikipedias. It is a new type of notification (via Echo, the notification system you see at the top right of your wiki when you are logged in), that will inform the creator of a page, when this page is connected to a Wikidata item.
You may know thatWikidata provides a centralized system for all the interwikilinks. When a new page is created, it should be connected to the corresponding Wikidata item, by modifying this Wikidata item. With this new notification, editors creating pages will be informed when another editor connects this page to Wikidata.
This feature will be deployed on May 30th on all the Wikipedias, excepting English, French and German. This feature will be disable by default for existing editors, and enabled by default for new editors.
This is the first step of the deployments, the Wikipedias and other Wikimedia projects will follow in the next months.
If you have any question, suggestion, please let me know by pinging me. You can also follow and leave a commenton the Phabricator ticket.
During Wikimedia Hackathon 2016, theDiscovery teamworked on one of the items on the 2015 community wishlist, namelyenabling searching the archive of deleted pages. This feature is now ready for production deployment, and will be enabled on all wikis, except Wikidata.
Right now, the feature is behind a feature flag - to use it on your wiki, please go to theSpecial:Undelete page, and add&fuzzy=1 to the URL, like this:https://test.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AUndelete&fuzzy=1. Then search for the pages you're interested in. There should be more results than before, due to using ElasticSearch indexing (via the CirrusSearch extension).
We plan to enable this improved search by default on all wikis soon (around August 1, 2017). If you have any objections to this - please raise them with the Discovery team viaemail or on this announcement's discussion page. Like most Mediawiki configuration parameters, the functionality can be configured per wiki. Once the improved search becomes the default, you can still access the old mode using&fuzzy=0 in the URL, like this:https://test.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AUndelete&fuzzy=0
Please note that since Special:Undelete is an admin-only feature, this search capability is also only accessible to wiki admins.
Wikipedia:Galicia 15 - 15 Challenge is a public writing competition which will improve improve and translate this list of 15 really important articles into as many languages as possible. Everybody can help in any language to collaborate on writing and/or translating articles related to Galicia. To participate you just need to sign uphere. Thank you very much.--Breogan2008 (overleg)12 dri 2018 14:36 (UTC)[reageren]
Time to bring embedded maps (‘mapframe’) to most Wikipedias
Time to bring embedded maps (‘mapframe’) to most Wikipedias
Help met het vertalen in uw taal
Mapframe is a feature that enables users to easily display interactive maps right on wiki pages. Currently, most Wikipedias don’t have mapframe. Butfifteen Wikipedias, along with all the other Wikimedia projects, are using mapframe today to display maps on thousands of pages.
A little background: over the last few months, the Foundation’sCollaboration team has been working to improve the stability and user experience of the maps service. In addition, a question about long-term support for the maps service was recently settled, and a small team has been assigned for routine maintenance. Given these developments, bringing the benefits of mapframe to Wikipedias that lack the feature seems both safe and supportable.Nine Wikipedias that use a stricter version of Flagged Revisions will not get mapframe in this release.
Maps are a valuable form of visual data that can improve readers’ understanding across a wide range of topics. If you know of any reasons why mapframe shouldn’t be implemented on your Wikipedia, let us knowon the project talk page. Unless we hear from you, we plan to release mapframe to most Wikipedias in May, 2018. So, if you foresee an issue, please let us hear from you. Otherwise, happy mapping!
Help met het vertalen in uw taalHi everyone. TheReaders web team has recently begun working on exposing issue templates on the mobile website. Currently, details about issues with page content are generally hidden on the mobile website. This leaves readers unaware of the reliability of the pages they are reading. The goal of this project is to improve awareness of particular issues within an article on the mobile web. We will do this by changing the visual styling of page issues.
The new treatment increases awareness of page issues among participants. This is true particularly when they are in a more evaluative/critical mode.
Page issues make sense to readers and they understand how they work
Readers care about page issues and consider them important
Readers had overwhelmingly positive sentiments towards Wikipedia associated with learning about page issues
Our next step would be to start implementing these changes. We wanted to reach out to you for any concerns, thoughts, and suggestions you might have before beginning development. Pleasevisit the project page where we have more information and mockups of how this may look. Pleaseleave feedback on the talk page.
The team working on TemplateStyles at the Wikimedia Foundation would like to enable TemplateStyles on this wiki.
TemplateStyles is a feature to allow non-administrators to write and manage CSS styles for templates. It allows contributors who edit templates to separate content and presentation. A good web practice that makes it easier to manage the layout of templates. If you don't edit templates, this will not have any impact on your contributions.
TemplateStyles is useful for a few reasons.
It makes it possible for templates to work better on mobile.
It cuts out confusion on where to apply CSS rules.
Editing CSS is currently limited to administrators, which is a major barrier to participation.
All stylesheets must be loaded on all pages (whether they actually use the page or not), which wastes bandwidth and makes debugging style rules more difficult.
This is an optional feature and no one must use it, but template contributors are encouraged to do so! Please discuss and let us know if there are any concerns. If there are no concerns we will proceed to deploy the feature on the 9th of August.
Sorry for writing this message in English - feel free to help us translating it:)
Hello all,
Many language versions of Wikipedia use the content ofWikidata, the centralized knowledge base, to fill out the content of infoboxes. The data is stored in Wikidata and displayed, partially or completely, in the Wikipedia’s language, on the articles.This feature is used by many template editors, but brought several issues that were raised by communities in various places: not being able to edit the data directly from Wikipedia was one of them.
This is the reason why theWikidata Bridge project started, with the goal of offering a way to Wikipedia editors to edit Wikidata’s data more easily. This will be achieved by an interface, connected to the infobox, that users can access directly from their local wiki.
The project is now at an early stage of development. A lot ofuser research has been done, and will continue to be done through the different phases of the project. The next steps ofdevelopment will be achieved by the development team working at Wikimedia Deutschland, starting now until the end of 2019.
In order to make sure that we’re building a tool that is answering editors’ needs, we’re using agile methods in our development process. We don’t start with a fixed idea of the tool we want to deliver: we will build it together with the editors, based on feedback loops that we will regularly organize. The first version will not necessarily have all of the features you want, but it will keep evolving.
Here’s the planned timeline:
From June to August, we will build the setup and technical groundwork.
From September to November 2019, we will develop the first version of the feature and publish a test system so you can try it and give feedback.
Later on, we will test the feature on a few projects, in collaboration with the communities.
We will first focus on early adopters communities who already implemented a shortcut from their infoboxes to edit Wikidata (for example Russian, Catalan, Basque Wikipedias)
Then we will reach some of the big Wikipedias (French, German, English) in order to see if the project scales and to address their potentially different needs.
Even later, we can consider enabling the feature on all the other projects.
In any case, no deployment or big change will be enforced on the projects without talking to the communities first, and helping the template builders to prepare for the changes they will have to do on the infoboxes’ code.
If you want to get involved, there are several ways to help:
More ideas will be addedon this page along the way
If you have any questions for the development team, feel free to ask themon the main talk page. You can also ask under this message, but if you expect an answer from me, please make sure to ping me.
Wikipedia Asian Month is back! We wish you all the best of luck for the contest. The basic guidelines of the contest can be found on your local page of Wikipedia Asian Month. For more information, referto our Meta page for organizers.
Looking forward to meet the next ambassadors for Wikipedia Asian Month 2019!
For additional support for organizing offline event, contact our international teamon wiki or on email. We would appreciate the translation of this message in the local language by volunteer translators. Thank you!
In consideration of a week-long internet block in Iran,Wikipedia Asian Month 2019 contest has been extended for a week past November. The articles submitted till 7th December 2019, 23:59 UTC will be accepted by the fountain tools of the participating wikis.
Please help us translate and spread this message in your local language.
Wiki Loves Love is back again in 2020 iteration asWiki Loves Folklore from 1 February, 2020 - 29 February, 2020. Join us to celebrate the local cultural heritage of your region with the theme of folklore in the international photography contest atWikimedia Commons. Images, videos and audios representing different forms of folk cultures and new forms of heritage that haven’t otherwise been documented so far are welcome submissions in Wiki Loves Folklore. Learn more about the contest atMeta-Wiki andCommons.
I apologize for sending a message in English.Help met het vertalen in uw taal. According tothe list, your wiki project currently is opted in to theglobal bot policy. Under this policy, bots that fix double redirects or maintain interwiki links are allowed to operate under a global bot flag that is assigned directly by the stewards.
As the Wikimedia projects developed, the need for the current global bot policy decreased, and in the past years, no bots were appointed via that policy. That is mainly given Wikidata were estabilished in 2013, and it is no longer necessary to have dozens of bots that maintain interwiki links.
Aproposal was made at Meta-Wiki, which proposes that the stewards will be authorized to determine whether an uncontroversial task may be assigned a global bot flag. The stewards already assign permissions that are more impactful on many wikis, namely,global sysops andglobal renamers, and I do not think that trust should be an issue. The stewards will assign the permission only to time-proven bots that are already approved at a number of projects, likeListeriaBot.
By this message, I would like to invite you to commentin the global RFC, to voice your opinion about this matter.
You are humbly invited to participate in theWiki Loves Folklore 2021 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.
You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, andsubmitting them in this commons contest.
Please support us in translating theproject page and abanner message to help us spread the word in your native language.
In this GRFC, I propose that two-project shortcuts for project names will become a default alias for the project namespace. For instance, on all Wikipedias, WP will be an alias to the Wikipedia: namespace (and similar for other projects). Full list is available in the GRFC.
This is already the case for Wikivoyages, and many individual projects asked for this alias to be implemented. I believe this makes it easier to access the materials in the project namespace, as well as creating shortcuts likeWP:NPOV, as well as helps new projects to use this feature, without having to figure out how to request site configuration changes first.
As far as I can see,Wikipedia currently does not have such an alias set. This means that such an alias will be set for you, if the GRFC is accepted by the global community.
I apologize for sending a message in English.Help met het vertalen in uw taal. According tothe list, your wiki project is currently opted in to theglobal bot policy. As such, I want to let you know about some changes that were made after theglobal RfC was closed.
Global bots are now subject to a 2 week discussion, and it'll be publicized via a MassMessage list, available atBot policy/New global bot discussion on Meta. Please subscribe yourself or your wiki if you are interested in new global bots proposals.
For a bot to be considered for approval, it must demonstrate it is welcomed in multiple projects, and a good way to do that is to have the bot flag on at least 5 wikis for a single task.
The bot operator should make sure to adhere to the wiki's preference as related to the use of the bot flag (i.e., if a wiki doesn't want a bot to use the flag as it edits, that should be followed).
You are humbly invited to participate in theWiki Loves Folklore 2022 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the1st till the 28th of February.
You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, andsubmitting them in this commons contest.
You can alsoorganize a local contest in your country and support us in translating theproject pages to help us spread the word in your native language.
Feel free to contact us on ourproject Talk page if you need any assistance.
Greetings from the EWOC Newsletter team and the education team at Wikimedia Foundation. We are very excited to share that we on tenth years of Education Newsletter (This Month in Education) invite you to join us bysubscribing to the newsletter on your talk page or bysharing your activities in the upcoming newsletters. The Wikimedia Education newsletter is a monthly newsletter that collects articles written by community members using Wikimedia projects in education around the world, and it is published by the EWOC Newsletter team in collaboration with the Education team. These stories can bring you new ideas to try, valuable insights about the success and challenges of our community members in running education programs in their context.
If your affiliate/language project is developing its own education initiatives, please remember to take advantage of this newsletter to publish your stories with the wider movement that shares your passion for education. You can submit newsletter articles in your own language or submit bilingual articles for the education newsletter. For the month of January the deadline to submit articles is on the 20th January. We look forward to reading your stories.
Older versions of this newsletter can be found in thecomplete archive.
Voting in the Wikimedia sound logo contesthas started. From December 6 to 19, 2022, please play a part and help chose the sound that will identify Wikimedia content on audio devices.Learn more on Diff.
The sound logo team is grateful to everyone who participated in this global contest. We received 3,235 submissions from 2,094 participants in 135 countries. We are incredibly grateful to the team ofvolunteer screeners and theselection committee who, among others, helped bring us to where we are today. It is now up to Wikimedia to choose the Sound Of All Human Knowledge.
Apologies for writing in English. If this is not the proper place to post, please move it somewhere more appropriate.Help met het vertalen in uw taalThere is an on-going discussion about a proposal that Piermark/House of Yahweh/HoY be globally banned from editing all Wikimedia projects. You are invited to participate atRequests for comment/Global ban for Piermark on Meta-Wiki.Bedankt!U.T. (Taki)4 fosfeyfi mun 2023 12:36 (UTC)[reageren]
.svg){kind=logo}
