Movatterモバイル変換
[0]ホーム
This is the mail archive of thelibc-alpha@sourceware.orgmailing list for theglibc project.
Re: Allow abort PLT references in libc.so for SH
- From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 11:56:04 -0400
- Subject: Re: Allow abort PLT references in libc.so for SH
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1708152131150.19980@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
On 08/15/2017 05:31 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:> Given my patch> <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-08/msg00965.html> for the> ICEs building a glibc string function test for SH, the testsuite can> build completely for SH with GCC 7 and mainline. However, there is a> test failure that does not appear for GCC 6: check-localplt fails> because of an abort PLT reference in libc.so.> > Given the lack of a trap insn pattern for SH, it seems unavoidable> that the compiler might sometimes generate abort calls, and such abort> calls (generated from __builtin_trap when there is no trap insn> pattern) will be unaffected by the normal mapping to __GI_abort for> calls within glibc. Thus, this patch allows (but does not require) an> abort PLT reference in libc.so for SH.> > Tested for sh4-linux-gnu with build-many-glibcs.py (GCC 7, with my> patch applied).> > 2017-08-15 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>> > * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sh/localplt.data: Allow abort in> libc.so.> > diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sh/localplt.data b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sh/localplt.data> index 2753547..babb19d 100644> --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sh/localplt.data> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sh/localplt.data> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ libc.so: _Unwind_Find_FDE> libc.so: _exit> libc.so: __errno_location> libm.so: matherr> +# Generated by the compiler because there is no trap insn pattern.> +libc.so: abort ?> # The main malloc is interposed into the dynamic linker, for> # allocations after the initial link (when dlopen is used).> ld.so: malloc> I agree that this is a good temporary measure, but why can't gcc befixed to use what we use in glibc for ABORT_INSTRUCTION?-- Cheers,Carlos.
[8]ページ先頭