Movatterモバイル変換

This is the mail archive of thelibc-alpha@sourceware.orgmailing list for theglibc project.

Re: Improved check-localedef script

• From: Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak at lingonborough dot com>
• To: Mike FABIAN <mfabian at redhat dot com>
• Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>,Zack Weinberg <zackw at panix dot com>
• Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 12:06:15 +0200 (CEST)
• Subject: Re: Improved check-localedef script
• Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
• References: <CAKCAbMjLN7SMWwveXVokSCttqso+r+1AttpFEpDBdJcSyiuQ4Q@mail.gmail.com> <s9d60e3bspn.fsf@redhat.com> <26692227.553011.1501838716734@poczta.nazwa.pl> <s9da83f64s7.fsf@redhat.com>
• Reply-to: Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak at lingonborough dot com>

4.08.2017 11:50 Mike FABIAN <mfabian@redhat.com> wrote:>> Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak@lingonborough.com> wrote:> [...]> > They may describe something more complex like <U00E0>. But even this> > is not UTF-8 because UTF-8 would be <C3> <A0> (UTF-8 is 8-bit). The> > closest charset would be UCS-2 or simply a generic Unicode.>> My understanding at the moment is that the “% Charset: ...” comment> indicates the encoding used to write the source file.I agree.> So something like> “<U20AC>” is definitely ASCII. Non-ASCII stuff in locale source files> seems to exist only in comments at the moment.So probably UTF-8 is a good choice.  And converting to UTF-8 ifthere is something non-UTF-8.Rafal

• References:
  • Improved check-localedef script
    • From: Zack Weinberg
  • Re: Improved check-localedef script
    • From: Mike FABIAN
  • Re: Improved check-localedef script
    • From: Rafal Luzynski
  • Re: Improved check-localedef script
    • From: Mike FABIAN