Movatterモバイル変換

This is the mail archive of thebinutils@sources.redhat.commailing list for thebinutils project.

Re: [davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com: Re: [PATCH] i386 vsyscall DSOimplementation]

• From: Jim Wilson <wilson at tuliptree dot org>
• To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
• Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
• Date: 16 Jun 2003 09:32:18 -0700
• Subject: Re: [davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com: Re: [PATCH] i386 vsyscall DSOimplementation]
• References: <20030614032158.GA24639@lucon.org><3EEBA6C7.6010206@tuliptree.org> <20030615041902.GA12909@lucon.org><1055652072.1019.98.camel@leaf.tuliptree.org><20030615125757.GF24872@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20030615153017.GA666@lucon.org>

On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 08:30, H. J. Lu wrote:> How can I tell the output segment in BFD? Is that information stored> somewhere and available to BFD?It seems I was worried about something that wasn't important.  Justchange sym_sec to input_section as in the original patch.Jim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com: Re: [PATCH] i386 vsyscall DSOimplementation]
    • From: H. J. Lu

• References:
  • [davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com: Re: [PATCH] i386 vsyscall DSOimplementation]
    • From: H. J. Lu
  • Re: [davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com: Re: [PATCH] i386 vsyscall DSOimplementation]
    • From: Jim Wilson
  • Re: [davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com: Re: [PATCH] i386 vsyscall DSOimplementation]
    • From: H. J. Lu
  • Re: [davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com: Re: [PATCH] i386 vsyscall DSOimplementation]
    • From: Jim Wilson
  • Re: [davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com: Re: [PATCH] i386 vsyscall DSO implementation]
    • From: Jakub Jelinek
  • Re: [davidm@napali.hpl.hp.com: Re: [PATCH] i386 vsyscall DSOimplementation]
    • From: H. J. Lu