Movatterモバイル変換

This is the mail archive of thebinutils@sources.redhat.commailing list for thebinutils project.

Re: dw2gencfi rewrite

• From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
• To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
• Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
• Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 01:13:57 +0930
• Subject: Re: dw2gencfi rewrite
• References: <20030527164813.GA10402@redhat.com> <u8u1bccwth.fsf@gromit.moeb><20030601003318.GA12066@redhat.com> <u83ciuz0my.fsf@gromit.moeb><20030601084126.GA12278@redhat.com> <u8ptlyxjfv.fsf@gromit.moeb><20030602060127.GC18550@redhat.com> <20030602224318.GA16909@ozlabs.au.ibm.com><u8fzmrsoik.fsf@gromit.moeb> <hok7c3aby9.fsf@byrd.suse.de>

On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 08:53:50AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:> > On i686-linux-gnu I now have these new failures:> Running /cvs/binutils-ln/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak/elfweak.exp ...> FAIL: ELF weak func first DSO> FAIL: ELF weak func last DSO> FAIL: ELF weak data first DSO> FAIL: ELF weak data last DSO> FAIL: ELF weak data first DSO common> FAIL: ELF weak data last DSO commonThese were there *before* my emit_expr patch, weren't they?  Wouldyou mind taking a look at ld.log, and finding the reason for thefailures?  (And perhaps reverting my patch, and seeing what happens.)Like HJ, I don't see these failures.-- Alan ModraIBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: dw2gencfi rewrite
    • From: Andreas Jaeger
  • Re: dw2gencfi rewrite
    • From: Andreas Jaeger

• References:
  • Re: dw2gencfi rewrite
    • From: Richard Henderson
  • Re: dw2gencfi rewrite
    • From: Andreas Jaeger
  • Re: dw2gencfi rewrite
    • From: Richard Henderson
  • Re: dw2gencfi rewrite
    • From: Andreas Jaeger
  • Re: dw2gencfi rewrite
    • From: Richard Henderson
  • Re: dw2gencfi rewrite
    • From: Alan Modra
  • Re: dw2gencfi rewrite
    • From: Andreas Jaeger
  • Re: dw2gencfi rewrite
    • From: Andreas Jaeger