Movatterモバイル変換

This is the mail archive of thebinutils@sources.redhat.commailing list for thebinutils project.

Re: Binutils 2.14 prerelease 2

• From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
• To: "Svein E. Seldal" <Svein dot Seldal at solidas dot com>
• Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
• Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 09:11:57 -0400
• Subject: Re: Binutils 2.14 prerelease 2
• References: <20030602211451.GA29294@nevyn.them.org> <3EDC5232.7060408@solidas.com>

On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 09:45:54AM +0200, Svein E. Seldal wrote:> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:> >I would appreciate any and all testing of this prerelease.  It will become> >binutils 2.14 in about a week unless a showstopper is found.> >> Hi,> > While waiting for approval for >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-05/msg00860.html> I also have discovered a bug in the coff-tic4x.c file. It contains > invalid initialization of the coff swap table for the COFF0 and COFF1 > targets. This bug is also present in the upcoming 2.14 release> > Attached fix.> > > BTW Do I need approval as a maintainer to check this thing into the 2.14 > branch when a release is close to final release like this? Do we operate > with freezes in the binutils tree?You have some discretion, but when we're this close I'd appreciatebeing asked.  For target-specific patches it's generally OK.  So goahead and commit this on the branch.> bfd/ChangeLog:> 2003-06-02  Svein E. Seldal  <Svein.Seldal@solidas.com>> >         * coff-tic4x.c: Fixed error in placement of member>         initialization of the ticoff0_swap_table and the>         ticoff1_swap_table structs.> ? build.inst.tic4x> Index: bfd/coff-tic4x.c> ===================================================================> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/coff-tic4x.c,v> retrieving revision 1.5> diff -c -3 -p -r1.5 coff-tic4x.c> *** bfd/coff-tic4x.c4 Apr 2003 08:15:13 -00001.5> --- bfd/coff-tic4x.c3 Jun 2003 07:26:21 -0000> *************** static const bfd_coff_backend_data ticof> *** 299,304 ****> --- 299,305 ---->   #else>     FALSE,>   #endif> +   COFF_DEFAULT_SECTION_ALIGNMENT_POWER,>   #ifdef COFF_FORCE_SYMBOLS_IN_STRINGS>     TRUE,>   #else> *************** static const bfd_coff_backend_data ticof> *** 309,315 ****>   #else>     2,>   #endif> -   COFF_DEFAULT_SECTION_ALIGNMENT_POWER,>     coff_SWAP_filehdr_in, coff_SWAP_aouthdr_in, coff_SWAP_scnhdr_in,>     coff_SWAP_reloc_in, ticoff0_bad_format_hook, coff_set_arch_mach_hook,>     coff_mkobject_hook, styp_to_sec_flags, coff_set_alignment_hook,> --- 310,315 ----> *************** static const bfd_coff_backend_data ticof> *** 340,345 ****> --- 340,346 ---->   #else>     FALSE,>   #endif> +   COFF_DEFAULT_SECTION_ALIGNMENT_POWER,>   #ifdef COFF_FORCE_SYMBOLS_IN_STRINGS>     TRUE,>   #else> *************** static const bfd_coff_backend_data ticof> *** 350,356 ****>   #else>     2,>   #endif> -   COFF_DEFAULT_SECTION_ALIGNMENT_POWER,>     coff_SWAP_filehdr_in, coff_SWAP_aouthdr_in, coff_SWAP_scnhdr_in,>     coff_SWAP_reloc_in, ticoff1_bad_format_hook, coff_set_arch_mach_hook,>     coff_mkobject_hook, styp_to_sec_flags, coff_set_alignment_hook,> --- 351,356 ------ Daniel JacobowitzMontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

• References:
  • Binutils 2.14 prerelease 2
    • From: Daniel Jacobowitz
  • Re: Binutils 2.14 prerelease 2
    • From: Svein E. Seldal