Movatterモバイル変換

This is the mail archive of thebinutils@sources.redhat.commailing list for thebinutils project.

Re: Unreviewed patches

• From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
• To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
• Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>,Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
• Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 21:12:44 -0700
• Subject: Re: Unreviewed patches
• References: <20030602124040.A13397@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20030603005805.GF25928@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 05:58:05PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:> On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 12:40:40PM -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:> >http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-05/msg00741.html> > Since I think I suggested PT_GNU_STACK in the first place,> I'm a bit biased, but I like this solution.  It's the least> amount of work for the kernel in execing a new application> short of having a dedicated ET_FLAGS bit (which we don't).> > The patch is ok.> I like the proposal. But I don't like the implementation.I'd like to see a generic note section for properties ofa relocatable file. I will make a detailed suggestiontomorrow.H.J.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Unreviewed patches
    • From: Jakub Jelinek

• References:
  • Re: Unreviewed patches
    • From: Richard Henderson