Movatterモバイル変換

This is the mail archive of thebinutils@sources.redhat.commailing list for thebinutils project.

Re: PATCH: Better handle discarded definition (take 2)

• From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
• To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
• Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
• Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 01:12:20 +0930
• Subject: Re: PATCH: Better handle discarded definition (take 2)
• References: <20030602080101.A30796@lucon.org><20030602152322.GA26488@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au><20030602082732.A31196@lucon.org>

On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 08:27:32AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:> On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 12:53:22AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:> > I like the idea of giving better error messages, but is it correct in> > this case to use error_handler instead of undefined_symbol?  Someone> > might be using bfd with their own undefined_symbol handler.> > The problem is the symbol is not exactly undefined. I think> undefined_symbol is misused here.Well, depends on your point of view.  I think discarded sectionsshould be treated as if they weren't even supplied to the linkerin the first place.-- Alan ModraIBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: PATCH: Better handle discarded definition (take 2)
    • From: H. J. Lu

• References:
  • PATCH: Better handle discarded definition (take 2)
    • From: H. J. Lu
  • Re: PATCH: Better handle discarded definition (take 2)
    • From: Alan Modra
  • Re: PATCH: Better handle discarded definition (take 2)
    • From: H. J. Lu