DNA barcoding is a form ofgenetic analysis. It is part ofmolecular biology. Scientists use DNA barcoding to tell differentspecies apart from each other. Scientists use DNA barcoding to tell which species are related to each other orevolved from the same older species.[1]
The first types ofDNA sequencing started in the 1980s.[1]
In DNA barcoding, the technician sequences part of a gene and compares it to that same gene in other species. Sometimes scientists use the short fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene as a DNA barcode gene.[2] The fragment is usually 400 to 800base pairs long.[3]
Groups of scientists choose different genes to barcode depending on their project. A good barcode gene has to be short in length and have the exact same sequence at its beginning and end, but its middle has to be different enough in different species.[3]
Some scientists say DNA barcoding is the opposite ofgenomics. DNA barcoding uses a few specific parts of the genome, and genomics is about looking at the entire genome.[4]
DNA barcoding costs less money than other kinds of DNA sequencing.[1] This means that smaller laboratories can afford to use it, and all laboratories can do more of it. It is also much easier to learn how to do than other forms of taxonomy. That means more people can learn to use it.[5]
One good thing about DNA barcoding is that it helps human beings get around ideas that seem right but are really wrong. For example, some animals look similar even though they are not closely related. Some animals look different even though they are closely related. It is easy for a scientist to think two species are related because they look or act alike. For example, cows are more closely related to whales andorcas than they are to horses, even though cows walk on hooves, live on land, and eat grass like horses do.[6] Looking at DNA barcoding makes it easier to see what really happened in evolution.
Another good thing about DNA barcoding is that scientists do not need to get close to the animal or plant they want to study. This is good for studying animals that are easily damaged, very shy, or dangerous to humans. The scientists do not even need to see theorganism to use DNA barcoding. In one study, scientists collectedfeces (poop) from an African savanna. They used DNA barcoding to tell which species of animal had left it there and which plants it had eaten, all from the undigested DNA.[1][3]
DNA barcoding makes it much much faster and easier to tell what a species eats. Before DNA barcoding, scientists had to follow aninsect or other animal around and watch it eat. This could take many years. With DNA barcoding, scientists can look at what is in the animal's digestive system. This is fast enough that scientists can watch animals' eating habits change withclimate change.[1]
With DNA sequencing and DNA barcoding, scientists went into museums to look at specimens, or preserved example animals, that had been collected many years before. Using DNA sequencing, the scientists were able to tell that one butterfly collected in the 1700s was really ten different species of butterfly and not just one. Scientists made many discoveries of this kind in old museum collections.[1]
Herpetologists (amphibian scientists) used DNA barcoding to analyze theparachuting frog in 2019. They found it by climbing mountains inPapua New Guinea.
{{cite magazine}}:Cite magazine requires|magazine= (help)