Movatterモバイル変換

nanog: by thread

• RSS Feed
• About List
• All Lists

Previous period

Next period

143 messagesstarting Sep 02 24 andending Sep 30 24
Date index |Thread index |Author index

• RFC 9234 route leak prevention in the wild!Job Snijders via NANOG (Sep 02)
  • Re: RFC 9234 route leak prevention in the wild!Richard Laager via NANOG (Sep 04)
  • Re: RFC 9234 route leak prevention in the wild!Jon Lewis (Sep 05)
    • Re: RFC 9234 route leak prevention in the wild!Mike Leber via NANOG (Sep 07)
    • Re: RFC 9234 route leak prevention in the wild!Douglas Fischer (Sep 18)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: RFC 9234 route leak prevention in the wild!Marinho Barcellos via NANOG (Sep 23)
• Survey for operators on IPv6 Extension HeadersJustin Iurman (Sep 03)
• REMINDER: Call for Participation -- ICANN81 DNSSEC and Security WorkshopJacques Latour via NANOG (Sep 04)
• Important ARIN Operational Change re Automatic IRR object creation (was: [arin-announce] Reminder - Automatic Creation of Managed IRR Route Objects upon RPKI ROA Generation Coming Soon)John Curran (Sep 04)
• Seeking IANA ccTLD contactChad Dailey (Sep 06)
  • Re: Seeking IANA ccTLD contactRubens Kuhl (Sep 06)
  • Re: Seeking IANA ccTLD contactTom Beecher (Sep 06)
    • Re: Seeking IANA ccTLD contactRubens Kuhl (Sep 06)
      • Re: Seeking IANA ccTLD contactChad Dailey (Sep 07)
      • Re: Seeking IANA ccTLD contactRubens Kuhl (Sep 08)
• New Video Series Asks Community, "Why NANOG?" + MoreNanog News (Sep 06)
• Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table ReportRouting Table Analysis Role Account (Sep 06)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table ReportRouting Table Analysis Role Account (Sep 13)
  • Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table ReportRouting Table Analysis Role Account (Sep 20)
  • Weekly Global IPv4 Routing Table ReportRouting Table Analysis Role Account (Sep 27)
• Re: Apple Geolocation contact?Tom Beecher (Sep 06)
• Hurricane Electric now supports "Never via route servers" (the peeringdb flag)Mike Leber via NANOG (Sep 07)
• Hurricane Electric now supports ASPA for route filteringMike Leber via NANOG (Sep 07)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Hurricane Electric now supports ASPA for route filteringLancheng via NANOG (Sep 14)
    • Re: Hurricane Electric now supports ASPA for route filteringSteveYi Yo (Sep 14)
    • Re: Hurricane Electric now supports ASPA for route filteringChristopher Morrow (Sep 22)
      • Re: Hurricane Electric now supports ASPA for route filteringJeroen Massar via NANOG (Sep 22)
• Spoofer Report for NANOG for Aug 2024CAIDA Spoofer Project (Sep 08)
• Re: Survey on barriers for RPKI adoptionSofia Silva Berenguer (Sep 08)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Re: Survey on barriers for RPKI adoptionLancheng via NANOG (Sep 10)
    • Re: Re: Survey on barriers for RPKI adoptionSofia Silva Berenguer (Sep 10)
• Survey on Internet Traffic Engineering practices.Kévin Vermeulen (Sep 09)
  • Re: Survey on Internet Traffic Engineering practices.Kévin Vermeulen (Sep 20)
• CenturyLink Denver - failing hardwareElliott Sims (Sep 09)
• MS Network issue ?Scott Q. (Sep 09)
• ATT contactDoug Barrett (Sep 10)
  • Re: ATT contactBrandon Jackson (Sep 10)
  • Re: ATT contactMatt Erculiani (Sep 10)
• Third Party VoIP Over XfinityMatt Hoppes (Sep 10)
  • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityNorman Jester via NANOG (Sep 10)
    • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityMatt Hoppes (Sep 10)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityNorman Jester via NANOG (Sep 10)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityMatt Hoppes (Sep 10)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityJon Lewis (Sep 10)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityMatt Hoppes (Sep 10)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityChris via NANOG (Sep 14)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityNorman Jester (Sep 10)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityMatt Hoppes (Sep 11)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityMark Wiater (Sep 10)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityMatt Hoppes (Sep 10)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityNorman Jester via NANOG (Sep 10)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityMichael Thomas (Sep 10)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityBrandon Jackson (Sep 10)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityMichael Thomas (Sep 10)
  • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityAaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG (Sep 10)
    • Re: Third Party VoIP Over Xfinitychris (Sep 10)
  • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityMike Hammett (Sep 10)
    • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityJim Shankland via NANOG (Sep 10)
    • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityMatt Hoppes (Sep 11)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityTom Beecher (Sep 11)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityJim Shankland via NANOG (Sep 11)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityJay Hennigan (Sep 11)
  • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityTim Burke (Sep 10)
    • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityMatt Hoppes (Sep 11)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityBrandon Ambrose (Sep 11)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityAaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG (Sep 11)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityTim Burke (Sep 11)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityAl Whaley (Sep 12)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityRobert DeVita (Sep 12)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityMike Hammett (Sep 12)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over Xfinitysronan (Sep 12)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityMatt Hoppes (Sep 13)
  • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityBrandon Svec via NANOG (Sep 12)
    • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityMichael Thomas (Sep 12)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityMatt Hoppes (Sep 13)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityMichael Thomas (Sep 13)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityBrandon Martin (Sep 14)
      • Re: Third Party VoIP Over XfinityMichael Thomas (Sep 14)
• Cloudfront Blocking IP rangesBrad Bendy (Sep 10)
  • Re: Cloudfront Blocking IP rangesQuentin Gabrel (Sep 11)
    • Re: Cloudfront Blocking IP rangesBrad Bendy (Sep 11)
• Incorrect Reverse DNS in Verizon Fios NYC core router tracerouteNeel Chauhan (Sep 10)
  • Re: Incorrect Reverse DNS in Verizon Fios NYC core router tracerouteDaniel Sterling (Sep 10)
    • Re: Incorrect Reverse DNS in Verizon Fios NYC core router tracerouteTim Burke (Sep 10)
      • Re: Incorrect Reverse DNS in Verizon Fios NYC core router traceroutesronan (Sep 10)
• Whoops. .mobi whois impersonationJay R. Ashworth (Sep 11)
• Looking for X's contactJorge Lobo (Sep 11)
  • Re: Looking for X's contactRubens Kuhl (Sep 19)
• Re: OIX (formerly Open-IX) Document Development Mailing List (Invitation to Join)Chris Grundemann (Sep 12)
• Vote Now: Color of N92 T-Shirt, Sneak Peek of Agenda + Video - Why NANOG?Nanog News (Sep 12)
• Layer 2 VPLS - Amsterdam - Singapore - LA (P2P) Multi Point to PointJames Braunegg (Sep 16)
• Cloudflare's rpki.json file is missing IPv4 ROAs longer than /24Steven Wallace (Sep 18)
  • Re: Cloudflare's rpki.json file is missing IPv4 ROAs longer than /24Ca By (Sep 18)
  • Re: Cloudflare's rpki.json file is missing IPv4 ROAs longer than /24Bryton Herdes via NANOG (Sep 18)
  • Re: Cloudflare's rpki.json file is missing IPv4 ROAs longer than /24Job Snijders via NANOG (Sep 18)
    • Re: Cloudflare's rpki.json file is missing IPv4 ROAs longer than /24Alex Band (Sep 18)
• duke.edu DNS IPv6 does not workSeth Mattinen via NANOG (Sep 19)
  • Re: duke.edu DNS IPv6 does not workMark Andrews (Sep 19)
• Question about the use of NO_EXPORT in BGP route announcementsSriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) via NANOG (Sep 19)
  • Re: Question about the use of NO_EXPORT in BGP route announcements7riw77 () gmail com (Sep 19)
  • Re: Question about the use of NO_EXPORT in BGP route announcementsMark Tinka (Sep 20)
    • Re: Question about the use of NO_EXPORT in BGP route announcementsJustin Krejci (Sep 20)
  • Re: Question about the use of NO_EXPORT in BGP route announcementsTarko Tikan (Sep 20)
    • Re: Question about the use of NO_EXPORT in BGP route announcementsElmar K. Bins (Sep 20)
      • Re: Question about the use of NO_EXPORT in BGP route announcementsTarko Tikan (Sep 20)
      • Re: Question about the use of NO_EXPORT in BGP route announcementssronan (Sep 20)
      • Re: Question about the use of NO_EXPORT in BGP route announcementsWarren Kumari (Sep 20)
      • Re: Question about the use of NO_EXPORT in BGP route announcementsBen Cartwright-Cox via NANOG (Sep 24)
      • Re: Question about the use of NO_EXPORT in BGP route announcementsJob Snijders via NANOG (Sep 24)
      • Re: Question about the use of NO_EXPORT in BGP route announcementsSteve Gibbard (Sep 20)
  • Re: Question about the use of NO_EXPORT in BGP route announcementsJeff Bartig (Sep 25)
    • RE: Question about the use of NO_EXPORT in BGP route announcementsSriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) via NANOG (Sep 25)
• The Votes Are In! NANOG 92 T-Shirt Color Will Be... + MoreNanog News (Sep 20)
• Retirement of FTP protocol support at ARIN? (was: [ARIN-consult] Consultation for the Retirement of FTP Protocol Use at ARIN)John Curran (Sep 20)
• db9f to usb-c serialRandy Bush (Sep 23)
  • Re: db9f to usb-c serialRandy Carpenter (Sep 23)
    • Re: db9f to usb-c serialWilliam Herrin (Sep 23)
  • Re: db9f to usb-c serialWilliam Herrin (Sep 23)
    • Re: db9f to usb-c serialMike Lyon (Sep 23)
  • Re: db9f to usb-c serialAndrew Latham (Sep 23)
    • Re: db9f to usb-c serialRandy Bush (Sep 24)
  • Re: db9f to usb-c serialBjørn Mork via NANOG (Sep 24)
    • Re: db9f to usb-c serialJay Hennigan (Sep 24)
      • Re: db9f to usb-c serialAnthony Newman via NANOG (Sep 24)
      • Re: db9f to usb-c serialWilliam Herrin (Sep 24)
      • Re: db9f to usb-c serialBjørn Mork via NANOG (Sep 24)
  • Re: db9f to usb-c serialFabian Mauchle via NANOG (Sep 24)
    • Re: db9f to usb-c serialRandy Bush (Sep 24)
      • Re: db9f to usb-c serialDavid Kotlerewsky (Sep 25)
• Re: Call for participation in an online academic surveyKANEMATSU Hiroaki (Sep 23)
• NANOG 92 Agenda is LIVE! + MoreNanog News (Sep 24)
• virtual nanog 92?michael brooks - ESC via NANOG (Sep 25)
  • Re: virtual nanog 92?Valerie Wittkop (Sep 25)
    • Re: virtual nanog 92?michael brooks - ESC via NANOG (Sep 25)
• Lumen ContactLivingood, Jason via NANOG (Sep 25)
• WSJ: China-Linked Hackers Breach U.S. ISPs in New "Salt Typhoon" attackSean Donelan (Sep 25)
• is it common to proxy register route objects for the purpose of grouping them for use in an as-setSteven Wallace (Sep 26)
  • Re: is it common to proxy register route objects for the purpose of grouping them for use in an as-setNiels Bakker (Sep 26)
    • Re: is it common to proxy register route objects for the purpose of grouping them for use in an as-setDale W. Carder (Sep 27)
  • Re: is it common to proxy register route objects for the purpose of grouping them for use in an as-setRubens Kuhl (Sep 26)
• 1Gig L2 serviceKARIM MEKKAOUI (Sep 27)
• Zoom ContactMark Tinka (Sep 30)
  • Re: Zoom ContactUdeme (Sep 30)

Previous period

Next period