Movatterモバイル変換

nanog: by thread

• RSS Feed
• About List
• All Lists

Previous period

Next period

762 messagesstarting May 01 07 andending May 31 07
Date index |Thread index |Author index

• Re: BGP Session TimeoutPascal Gloor (May 01)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: BGP Session TimeoutFergie (May 01)
• Re: Bandwidth Augmentation TriggersSimon Leinen (May 01)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Bandwidth Augmentation TriggersDeepak Jain (May 01)
• 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testingRon da Silva (May 01)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testingScott Weeks (May 01)
    • Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testingRon da Silva (May 02)
      • Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testingKradorex Xeron (May 02)
    • Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testingRon da Silva (May 02)
  • Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testingMartin Hannigan (May 02)
  • Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testingScott Weeks (May 02)
    • Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testingRon da Silva (May 02)
      • Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testingJay Hennigan (May 02)
    • Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testingWarren Kumari (May 02)
      • RE: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testingandrew2 (May 02)
      • Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testingWarren Kumari (May 02)
      • E-mail addresses and signatures [was: RE: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testing]Steve Gibbard (May 04)
  • Re: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testingScott Weeks (May 02)
  • RE: 96.0.0.0/6 reachability testingBrandon Butterworth (May 04)
• IRC bots and SOPs regardingEric Frazier (May 01)
  • Re: IRC bots and SOPs regardingEric Frazier (May 01)
• Warning about UltraDNS termsSean Donelan (May 02)
  • Re: Warning about UltraDNS termsPeter Beckman (May 02)
    • Re: Warning about UltraDNS termsMatthew Sullivan (May 02)
    • Re: Warning about UltraDNS termsAaron Glenn (May 02)
    • Re: Warning about UltraDNS termsJohn Kinsella (May 03)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Warning about UltraDNS termsJohn Kinsella (May 03)
• cisco ios bug...?Payam chiachi (May 02)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: cisco ios bug...?Scott Weeks (May 02)
• Ratio between Number of Radius Accouting Server and Number of Radiuis Authentication ServerJoe Shen (May 03)
  • Re: Ratio between Number of Radius Accouting Server and Number of Radiuis Authentication ServerK K (May 03)
    • Re: Ratio between Number of Radius Accouting Server and Number of Radiuis Authentication ServerJoe Shen (May 03)
• Slightly OT: datacenter cage providers in SF Bay Area?Mike Lyon (May 03)
  • Re: Slightly OT: datacenter cage providers in SF Bay Area?Mike Lyon (May 03)
    • Re: Slightly OT: datacenter cage providers in SF Bay Area?Paul Vixie (May 03)
• NANOG40 UpdatesBetty J. Burke (May 03)
• Re: Open WiFi Access Point BCP's???Mike Hammett (May 03)
• BGP Update Reportcidr-report (May 04)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • BGP Update Reportcidr-report (May 11)
  • BGP Update Reportcidr-report (May 18)
  • BGP Update Reportcidr-report (May 25)
• The Cidr Reportcidr-report (May 04)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • The Cidr Reportcidr-report (May 11)
  • The Cidr Reportcidr-report (May 18)
  • The Cidr Reportcidr-report (May 25)
• Weekly Routing Table ReportRouting Analysis Role Account (May 04)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Weekly Routing Table ReportRouting Analysis Role Account (May 11)
  • Weekly Routing Table ReportRouting Analysis Role Account (May 18)
  • Weekly Routing Table ReportRouting Analysis Role Account (May 25)
• Verizon Technical Contact requestedLM Network Ops (May 04)
  • Re: Verizon Technical Contact requestedChris L. Morrow (May 04)
• Clueful @ New Edge Networks/EarthlinkScott Morris (May 05)
• barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecJoe Maimon (May 06)
  • RE: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecLincoln Dale (May 06)
    • Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecJoe Maimon (May 06)
      • RE: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecLincoln Dale (May 06)
      • Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecJoe Maimon (May 06)
      • Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecAdrian Chadd (May 06)
      • RE: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecLincoln Dale (May 06)
      • Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecSteven M. Bellovin (May 06)
      • Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecJoe Maimon (May 06)
      • Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecJo Rhett (May 07)
      • Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecJoe Maimon (May 07)
      • Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecPeter Dambier (May 07)
      • Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecJo Rhett (May 07)
      • RE: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecLincoln Dale (May 07)
      • Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecMin (May 07)
      • Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecJoe Maimon (May 07)
      • Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecJoe Maimon (May 07)
      • Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecAdrian Chadd (May 07)
      • Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecJoe Maimon (May 07)
      • Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecAdrian Chadd (May 07)
      • RE: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecLincoln Dale (May 07)
      • Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecJoe Shen (May 07)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecScott Weeks (May 07)
    • RE: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecLincoln Dale (May 07)
    • Re: barak-online.net icmp performance vs. traceroute/tcptraceroute, ssh, ipsecJoe Maimon (May 07)
• Typical core router portsSaqib Ilyas (May 07)
• Load balancingdan (May 07)
  • Re: Load balancingMike Lyon (May 07)
  • Re: Load balancingWalter Prue (May 07)
  • Re: Load balancingJo Rhett (May 07)
  • Re: Load balancingBruce Pinsky (May 07)
    • Re: Load balancingNicolás Antoniello (May 08)
• Re: BOGON Announcement questionDanny McPherson (May 07)
  • Re: BOGON Announcement questionChris L. Morrow (May 07)
• Foundry/Cisco MM 100Base-T SFP in Philly?Robert Boyle (May 07)
• Re: [cacti-announce] Cacti 0.8.6j Released (fwd)Travis H. (May 08)
  • F/OSS config mgmt or net mgmt appsTravis H. (May 08)
  • Re: Cacti 0.8.6j Released (fwd)Matt Palmer (May 08)
    • Re: Cacti 0.8.6j Released (fwd)matthew zeier (May 08)
      • Re: Cacti 0.8.6j Released (fwd)Matthew Palmer (May 08)
      • Re: Cacti 0.8.6j Released (fwd)Peter Dambier (May 09)
  • RE: [cacti-announce] Cacti 0.8.6j Released (fwd)michael.dillon (May 09)
    • Re: [cacti-announce] Cacti 0.8.6j Released (fwd)Joe Abley (May 09)
    • RE: [cacti-announce] Cacti 0.8.6j Released (fwd)Steve Sobol (May 09)
    • Re: [cacti-announce] Cacti 0.8.6j Released (fwd)Travis H. (May 16)
      • Re: [cacti-announce] Cacti 0.8.6j Released (fwd)Dorn Hetzel (May 17)
• Re: Google wants to be your InternetTravis H. (May 08)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Google wants to be your InternetTravis H. (May 08)
• F/OSS SNMP tools (was Re: Cacti 0.8.6j Released)Kevin Blackham (May 08)
• Omaha, NE Carrier Hotels???Robert Boyle (May 09)
  • RE: Omaha, NE Carrier Hotels???Randy Epstein (May 09)
• Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in the IOS FTP ServerCisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team (May 09)
• remote hands and eyes (west coast).virendra rode // (May 09)
• ISP CALEA complianceNikos Mouat (May 10)
  • Re: ISP CALEA complianceChris L. Morrow (May 10)
  • Re: ISP CALEA complianceDavid E. Smith (May 10)
    • Re: ISP CALEA complianceMike Hammett (May 10)
  • Re: ISP CALEA complianceJared Mauch (May 10)
    • Re: ISP CALEA complianceJason Frisvold (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceJeff Shultz (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA compliancePatrick Muldoon (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceJason Frisvold (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceSean Donelan (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceDaniel Senie (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceSean Donelan (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA compliancePatrick Muldoon (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceMike Hammett (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceSean Donelan (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceWilliam Allen Simpson (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceSteven M. Bellovin (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceJack Bates (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceMike Hammett (May 10)
    • Re: ISP CALEA complianceWilliam Allen Simpson (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceJon Lewis (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceWilliam Allen Simpson (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceJack Bates (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceJason Frisvold (May 11)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceChris L. Morrow (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceBrandon Galbraith (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceJason Frisvold (May 11)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceJared Mauch (May 11)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceChris L. Morrow (May 11)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceJoe Abley (May 23)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceJoe Abley (May 23)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceChris L. Morrow (May 23)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceJared Mauch (May 23)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceSteven M. Bellovin (May 23)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceRandy Bush (May 23)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceSteve Feldman (May 23)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceSteven M. Bellovin (May 11)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceSteven M. Bellovin (May 11)
      • RE: ISP CALEA complianceStasiniewicz, Adam (May 10)
      • RE: ISP CALEA complianceSean Donelan (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceJeff Shultz (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceJack Bates (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceDonald Stahl (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceStephen Sprunk (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceJack Bates (May 11)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceDonald Stahl (May 11)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceJoe Provo (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceSean Donelan (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceDavid Lesher (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceStephen Satchell (May 10)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceWilliam Allen Simpson (May 11)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceSteven M. Bellovin (May 11)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceSean Donelan (May 11)
  • Re: ISP CALEA complianceMike Hammett (May 10)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ISP CALEA complianceJason Frisvold (May 11)
  • Re: ISP CALEA complianceSteven M. Bellovin (May 11)
  • Re: ISP CALEA complianceMartin Hannigan (May 12)
    • Re: ISP CALEA complianceJoe Provo (May 12)
  • Re: ISP CALEA complianceMartin Hannigan (May 23)
    • Re: ISP CALEA complianceRandy Bush (May 23)
    • Re: ISP CALEA complianceAlbert Meyer (May 23)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceOwen DeLong (May 23)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceSuresh Ramasubramanian (May 23)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceValdis . Kletnieks (May 23)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceSuresh Ramasubramanian (May 23)
      • Re: ISP CALEA complianceAndy Davidson (May 24)
• REMINDER: NANOG40 Hotel and Early Registration DeadlinesSteve Feldman (May 10)
• Policy of Dial-up session processingJoe Shen (May 11)
  • Re: Policy of Dial-up session processingJared Mauch (May 11)
    • Bell South Postmaster?Vish Yelsangikar (May 11)
  • Re: Policy of Dial-up session processingValdis . Kletnieks (May 11)
  • Re: Policy of Dial-up session processingwilliam(at)elan.net (May 11)
    • Re: Policy of Dial-up session processingNicolás Antoniello (May 11)
      • Re: Policy of Dial-up session processingAdrian Chadd (May 11)
• OT: ISP Security BOF @NANOG 40Danny McPherson (May 11)
• Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?K K (May 11)
  • Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?Albert Meyer (May 11)
    • Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?K K (May 11)
      • Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?Jeroen Massar (May 11)
      • Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?John Levine (May 11)
      • Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?william(at)elan.net (May 11)
      • Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?K K (May 12)
      • Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?Douglas Otis (May 13)
      • Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?John Levine (May 13)
      • RE: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?Stasiniewicz, Adam (May 12)
  • Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 11)
    • Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?Al Iverson (May 12)
      • Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?Gerry Boudreaux (May 12)
    • Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complainthandling?Niels Bakker (May 12)
      • Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?John Levine (May 12)
      • Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?Al Iverson (May 13)
      • Re: Best practices for abuse@ mailbox and network abuse complaint handling?Suresh Ramasubramanian (May 13)
• HSRP availability in datacenters?Randal Kohutek (May 11)
  • Re: HSRP availability in datacenters?Mike Lyon (May 11)
    • RE: HSRP availability in datacenters?Randal Kohutek (May 11)
      • Re: HSRP availability in datacenters?Mike Lyon (May 11)
      • RE: HSRP availability in datacenters?Randal Kohutek (May 11)
      • Re: HSRP availability in datacenters?Mike Lyon (May 11)
      • RE: HSRP availability in datacenters?Justin M. Streiner (May 11)
      • RE: HSRP availability in datacenters?Brad McConnell (May 11)
      • Re: HSRP availability in datacenters?Jason Matthews (May 11)
      • RE: HSRP availability in datacenters?Randal Kohutek (May 11)
      • RE: HSRP availability in datacenters?Donald Stahl (May 11)
      • Re: HSRP availability in datacenters?Jason Matthews (May 11)
      • Re: HSRP availability in datacenters?Donald Stahl (May 11)
  • Re: HSRP availability in datacenters?Deepak Jain (May 11)
• How many others are nullrouting BT?Jo Rhett (May 11)
  • Message not available
    • Re: How many others are nullrouting BT?Jo Rhett (May 11)
      • Re: How many others are nullrouting BT?bill hulley (May 12)
      • Re: How many others are nullrouting BT?Jo Rhett (May 12)
      • Message not available
      • Re: How many others are nullrouting BT?Jo Rhett (May 12)
      • Message not available
      • Re: How many others are nullrouting BT?Jo Rhett (May 12)
      • RE: How many others are nullrouting BT?michael.dillon (May 14)
      • Re: How many others are nullrouting BT?Jo Rhett (May 14)
      • Directly contacting ISP's (Was: How many others are nullrouting BT?)Jeroen Massar (May 14)
      • RE: Directly contacting ISP's (Was: How many others are nullrouting BT?)michael.dillon (May 14)
      • Re: Directly contacting ISP's (Was: How many others are nullrouting BT?)Jo Rhett (May 14)
      • Re: Directly contacting ISP's (Was: How many others are nullrouting BT?)Will Hargrave (May 17)
      • Re: Directly contacting ISP's (Was: How many others are nullrouting BT?)Jo Rhett (May 17)
  • Re: How many others are nullrouting BT?alex (May 12)
    • Re: How many others are nullrouting BT?Jo Rhett (May 12)
      • Re: How many others are nullrouting BT?Alexander Koch (May 13)
      • Re: How many others are nullrouting BT?Jo Rhett (May 14)
      • Re: How many others are nullrouting BT?Ross Hosman (May 17)
  • Re: How many others are nullrouting BT?James Blessing (May 14)
    • Re: How many others are nullrouting BT?Jo Rhett (May 14)
• [Off-topic] Videotron / VTL contactTodd Mitchell (May 11)
• Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveGadi Evron (May 11)
  • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveAlbert Meyer (May 11)
    • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveSuresh Ramasubramanian (May 12)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveFlorian Weimer (May 13)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveSean Donelan (May 13)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveGadi Evron (May 13)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveColin Johnston (May 13)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveChris L. Morrow (May 13)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveGadi Evron (May 13)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveSean Donelan (May 13)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveGadi Evron (May 14)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveSean Donelan (May 14)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveJoel Jaeggli (May 13)
  • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveStephen Satchell (May 12)
  • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveRoss Hosman (May 16)
    • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveGadi Evron (May 16)
    • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactivePeter Dambier (May 17)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveFergie (May 12)
    • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveGadi Evron (May 12)
    • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveKradorex Xeron (May 12)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveAlbert Meyer (May 15)
      • RE: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactivemichael.dillon (May 15)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveJoel Jaeggli (May 15)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveAdrian Chadd (May 15)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveJoe Greco (May 15)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactivealex (May 15)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveIan Mason (May 15)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveGadi Evron (May 15)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveJoel Jaeggli (May 16)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveGadi Evron (May 16)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveBarry Shein (May 16)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveJoe Abley (May 16)
      • Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactivePeter Dambier (May 15)
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • What's on topic for nanog@ vs. nanog-futures@Robert E. Seastrom (May 19)
• [urgent assistance] 198.32.0.0/16 - Disappeared...Fergie (May 11)
  • Congratulations: All 6bone prefixes are from finally out of BGP (Was: [urgent assistance] 198.32.0.0/16 - Disappeared...)Jeroen Massar (May 12)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [urgent assistance] 198.32.0.0/16 - Disappeared...Fergie (May 11)
    • Re: [urgent assistance] 198.32.0.0/16 - Disappeared...Joe Abley (May 13)
      • Re: [urgent assistance] 198.32.0.0/16 - Disappeared...Carlos Kamtha (May 13)
  • Re: [urgent assistance] 198.32.0.0/16 - Disappeared...Fergie (May 13)
  • Re: [urgent assistance] 198.32.0.0/16 - Disappeared...Fergie (May 13)
• Quest route serverTodd White (May 12)
  • RE: Quest route serverMills, Charles (May 12)
• Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20?Neal Rauhauser (May 13)
  • Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20?Joe Abley (May 13)
    • Message not available
      • Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20?Neal Rauhauser (May 13)
      • Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20?sthaug (May 14)
  • Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20?Donald Stahl (May 13)
    • Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20?Chris L. Morrow (May 13)
      • Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20?Donald Stahl (May 13)
      • Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20?Hyunseog Ryu (May 14)
      • oversubscribed ports for Juniper are a new featureNeal Rauhauser (May 14)
    • Message not available
      • Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20?Donald Stahl (May 14)
      • Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20?Warren Kumari (May 15)
      • Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20?Daniel Roesen (May 17)
  • Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20?sthaug (May 14)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Juniper M10i sufficient for BGP, or go with M20?Scott Weeks (May 14)
• No Verizon ethernet @ 505 Marquette in ABQ?Neal Rauhauser (May 13)
• ISP Security BOF @NANOG 40Danny McPherson (May 13)
• Cogent PeeringKevin Billings (May 14)
  • Re: Cogent Peeringkeith (May 14)
    • RE: Cogent PeeringRandy Epstein (May 14)
• OT: 2007 Infrastructure Security SurveyDanny McPherson (May 14)
• IPv4 multihomed sites statisticsMasafumi Watari (May 15)
  • Re: IPv4 multihomed sites statisticsPatrick W. Gilmore (May 15)
    • Re: IPv4 multihomed sites statisticsOwen DeLong (May 15)
• VOIP and QOS across local network and the InternetRick Kunkel (May 15)
  • Re: VOIP and QOS across local network and the InternetJo Rhett (May 15)
  • Re: VOIP and QOS across local network and the InternetNeal Rauhauser (May 15)
  • Re: VOIP and QOS across local network and the InternetStephen Satchell (May 15)
• RTT from NY to New Delhi?Joe Maimon (May 16)
  • Re: RTT from NY to New Delhi?Justin M. Streiner (May 16)
    • Re: RTT from NY to New Delhi?Mike Hammett (May 16)
    • Re: RTT from NY to New Delhi?Joe Maimon (May 16)
  • Re: RTT from NY to New Delhi?Eric Gauthier (May 16)
    • Re: RTT from NY to New Delhi?Chris L. Morrow (May 16)
  • Re: RTT from NY to New Delhi?Justin M. Streiner (May 16)
  • Re: RTT from NY to New Delhi?Robert Baxter (May 16)
  • Re: RTT from NY to New Delhi?Tim Franklin (May 16)
    • Re: RTT from NY to New Delhi?Marshall Eubanks (May 16)
      • Re: RTT from NY to New Delhi?Gian Constantine (May 16)
    • Re: RTT from NY to New Delhi?Stephen Sprunk (May 16)
  • Re: RTT from NY to New Delhi?John Payne (May 16)
  • Re: RTT from NY to New Delhi?Steven M. Bellovin (May 16)
    • Re: RTT from NY to New Delhi?Joe Maimon (May 16)
• Colocation facilities in britianjgrajewski () mandylionlabs com (May 16)
  • Re: Colocation facilities in britianJohn Kinsella (May 16)
    • Re: Colocation facilities in britianJason Matthews (May 16)
  • Re: Colocation facilities in britianFredy Kuenzler (May 16)
  • RE: Colocation facilities in britianmichael.dillon (May 16)
    • Re: Colocation facilities in BritainWill Hargrave (May 17)
  • Re: Colocation facilities in britianAndy Davidson (May 18)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Colocation facilities in britianStuart Henderson (May 16)
• ATT <-> Broadwing (Level3) CongestionBrandon Galbraith (May 16)
  • Re: ATT <-> Broadwing (Level3) CongestionJerry Pasker (May 16)
  • Re: ATT <-> Broadwing (Level3) Congestionvirendra rode // (May 16)
  • Re: ATT <-> Broadwing (Level3) CongestionBrandon Galbraith (May 16)
• Stop! Please! Re: Broadband routers and botnets - being proactiveScott Weeks (May 16)
• Open DNS Operations Meeting, Chicago 27/28th JulyKeith Mitchell (May 17)
• Google Apps for ISPs?Martin Hannigan (May 18)
  • Re: Google Apps for ISPs?Martin Hannigan (May 23)
• recommendations for Cisco repair?Carl Alexander (May 18)
  • Re: recommendations for Cisco repair?Justin M. Streiner (May 18)
• colocation facilities in BritainJoseph Grajewski (May 19)
• Interesting new dns failuresRoger Marquis (May 20)
  • Re: Interesting new dns failuresRoger Marquis (May 20)
    • Re: Interesting new dns failuresChris L. Morrow (May 20)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresRoger Marquis (May 20)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresChris L. Morrow (May 20)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresValdis . Kletnieks (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresbmanning (May 21)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresValdis . Kletnieks (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresChris L. Morrow (May 21)
      • RE: Interesting new dns failuresmichael.dillon (May 21)
      • RE: Interesting new dns failuresChris L. Morrow (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresJoe Provo (May 22)
      • RE: Interesting new dns failuresmichael.dillon (May 22)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresValdis . Kletnieks (May 22)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresWill Hargrave (May 25)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresChris L. Morrow (May 25)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresTim Franklin (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresSimon Waters (May 21)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresTim Franklin (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresSteve Gibbard (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresTim Franklin (May 22)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresTim Franklin (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresJoe Abley (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresSimon Waters (May 21)
      • RE: Interesting new dns failuresmichael.dillon (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresStephane Bortzmeyer (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresRoger Marquis (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresGadi Evron (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresChris L. Morrow (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresGadi Evron (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresChris L. Morrow (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresRoger Marquis (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresChris L. Morrow (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresGadi Evron (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresEdward Lewis (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresCrist Clark (May 22)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresPaul Vixie (May 22)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresGadi Evron (May 22)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresChris L. Morrow (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresGadi Evron (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresDavid Ulevitch (May 22)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresGadi Evron (May 22)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresDavid Ulevitch (May 22)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresGadi Evron (May 22)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresDouglas Otis (May 23)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresDavid Ulevitch (May 24)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresSuresh Ramasubramanian (May 24)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresKradorex Xeron (May 24)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresChris L. Morrow (May 24)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresSteve Atkins (May 24)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresPer Heldal (May 24)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresSuresh Ramasubramanian (May 24)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresJohn LaCour (May 24)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresSuresh Ramasubramanian (May 24)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresHank Nussbacher (May 23)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresRoger Marquis (May 22)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresDavid Ulevitch (May 22)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresChris L. Morrow (May 22)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresSuresh Ramasubramanian (May 22)
    • Re: Interesting new dns failuresStephane Bortzmeyer (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresMark Andrews (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresGadi Evron (May 21)
  • Re: Interesting new dns failuresGadi Evron (May 21)
  • Re: Interesting new dns failuresJason Frisvold (May 21)
    • Re: Interesting new dns failuresRoger Marquis (May 21)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresValdis . Kletnieks (May 21)
      • Use of portions of 44.0.0.0/8?Neal R (May 21)
      • Re: Use of portions of 44.0.0.0/8?Andy Brezinsky (May 21)
      • OK - functioning administration of 44.0.0.0/8Neal R (May 21)
      • Re: OK - functioning administration of 44.0.0.0/8Harald Koch (May 21)
      • Re: Use of portions of 44.0.0.0/8?Joel Jaeggli (May 21)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Interesting new dns failuresFergie (May 20)
  • Re: Interesting new dns failuresFergie (May 20)
    • Re: Interesting new dns failuresJohn Curran (May 21)
  • Re: Interesting new dns failuresFergie (May 21)
    • Re: Interesting new dns failuresChris L. Morrow (May 21)
  • Re: Interesting new dns failuresFergie (May 21)
  • Re: Interesting new dns failuresFergie (May 22)
    • Re: Interesting new dns failuresDavid Ulevitch (May 22)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresChris L. Morrow (May 22)
  • Re: Interesting new dns failuresFergie (May 22)
  • Re: Interesting new dns failuresFergie (May 24)
    • Re: Interesting new dns failuresChris L. Morrow (May 24)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresRoger Marquis (May 24)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresJohn Levine (May 24)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresPer Heldal (May 25)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresSimon Waters (May 25)
  • Re: Interesting new dns failuresFergie (May 24)
    • Re: Interesting new dns failuresJohn Levine (May 24)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresDouglas Otis (May 25)
  • Re: Interesting new dns failuresScott Weeks (May 25)
    • Re: Interesting new dns failuresValdis . Kletnieks (May 25)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresChris L. Morrow (May 25)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresValdis . Kletnieks (May 25)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresChris L. Morrow (May 25)
      • Re: Interesting new dns failuresJohn Levine (May 25)
    • Re: Interesting new dns failuresSuresh Ramasubramanian (May 25)
  • Re: Interesting new dns failuresScott Weeks (May 25)
• SDH mux questionAlexander Koch (May 20)
  • Re: SDH mux questionSimon Lockhart (May 20)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: SDH mux questionNeil J. McRae (May 21)
• [info () arin net: [arin-announce] ARIN Board Advises Internet Community on Migration to IPv6]bmanning (May 21)
• qwest backbonePhilip Lavine (May 21)
  • Re: qwest backboneDavid Ulevitch (May 21)
    • Re: qwest backboneElmar K. Bins (May 21)
    • Re: qwest backboneDavid Ulevitch (May 21)
  • Re: qwest backboneJeremy Chadwick (May 21)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: qwest backboneprue (May 21)
    • RE: qwest backboneGregori Parker (May 21)
  • RE: qwest backboneJames Laszko (May 21)
• Re: OK - functioning administration of 44.0.0.0/8Brandon Butterworth (May 21)
  • Re: OK - functioning administration of 44.0.0.0/8David Conrad (May 21)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OK - functioning administration of 44.0.0.0/8Brandon Butterworth (May 21)
    • motivation for routing a bit of 44.0.0.0/8Neal R (May 21)
      • Re: motivation for routing a bit of 44.0.0.0/8Valdis . Kletnieks (May 21)
      • Re: motivation for routing a bit of 44.0.0.0/8Neal R (May 21)
• Cisco Security Advisory: Vulnerability In Crypto LibraryCisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team (May 22)
• Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco IOS While Processing SSL PacketsCisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team (May 22)
• Detailed Juniper J-Flow OverviewFergie (May 22)
  • RE: Detailed Juniper J-Flow Overviewmichael.dillon (May 23)
• Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatckTom Vest (May 23)
  • Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatckBill Woodcock (May 23)
    • Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatckBill Woodcock (May 23)
    • Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatckSean Donelan (May 23)
      • Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatckBill Woodcock (May 23)
      • Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatckge (May 23)
      • Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatckAlexander Harrowell (May 24)
      • Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatckBill Woodcock (May 24)
      • Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatckMarshall Eubanks (May 24)
      • Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatckMerike Kaeo (May 24)
      • RE: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatckmichael.dillon (May 24)
      • Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatckMerike Kaeo (May 24)
      • Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatckBill Woodcock (May 24)
      • Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatckDanny McPherson (May 24)
      • Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatckSean Donelan (May 24)
      • Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatckChris L. Morrow (May 24)
      • Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatckPer Heldal (May 25)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Slate Podcast on Estonian DOS atatckScott Weeks (May 23)
• BGP announce/withdrawal history.Forrest W. Christian (May 24)
  • RE: BGP announce/withdrawal history.Neil J. McRae (May 24)
  • Re: BGP announce/withdrawal history.Erik Romijn (May 24)
  • Re: BGP announce/withdrawal history.Peter Walker (May 24)
  • Re: BGP announce/withdrawal history.Randy Bush (May 24)
  • Re: BGP announce/withdrawal history.Joe Abley (May 24)
• OT: NANOG 40 accomodationsBrighten Godfrey (May 24)
  • Re: OT: NANOG 40 accomodationsJoe Abley (May 24)
• meeting A/V clubMatt Peterson (May 24)
• Postel Ops Scholarship gl!tchRandy Bush (May 25)
• NANOG 40 agenda postedSteve Feldman (May 25)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedMartin Hannigan (May 25)
    • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedRandy Bush (May 25)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedMartin Hannigan (May 26)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedRandy Bush (May 26)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedMartin Hannigan (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJared Mauch (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedIljitsch van Beijnum (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedSteven M. Bellovin (May 26)
      • RE: NANOG 40 agenda postedKrichbaum, Eric (May 26)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedmatthew zeier (May 26)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJeroen Massar (May 26)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJoel Jaeggli (May 26)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJeroen Massar (May 26)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJared Mauch (May 26)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedKevin Day (May 26)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedChris L. Morrow (May 26)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedMartin Hannigan (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedNathan Ward (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJeroen Massar (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedNathan Ward (May 27)
      • Moving to IPv6 (Was: NANOG 40 agenda posted)Jeroen Massar (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedChris L. Morrow (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedwilliam(at)elan.net (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedwilliam(at)elan.net (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedChris L. Morrow (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedManolo Hernandez (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedChris L. Morrow (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedManolo Hernandez (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJohn Curran (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedDonald Stahl (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedIljitsch van Beijnum (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedAlexander Harrowell (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedAndy Davidson (May 31)
      • RE: NANOG 40 agenda postedmichael.dillon (May 31)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedDonald Stahl (May 29)
      • using v6 specific names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedEdward Lewis (May 29)
      • IPv6 services trialmichael.dillon (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedDavid Conrad (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedLeo Vegoda (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedIljitsch van Beijnum (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedNathan Ward (May 29)
      • IPv6 Deployment (Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)Donald Stahl (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 Deployment (Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 30)
      • Re: IPv6 Deployment (Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)Donald Stahl (May 30)
      • Re: IPv6 Deployment (Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)Kevin Loch (May 30)
      • Re: IPv6 Deployment (Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 30)
      • why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedEdward Lewis (May 29)
      • Re: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedDavid Conrad (May 29)
      • Re: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedEdward Lewis (May 29)
      • Re: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedDavid Conrad (May 29)
      • Re: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedIljitsch van Beijnum (May 30)
      • Re: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedNathan Ward (May 30)
      • RE: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedmichael.dillon (May 30)
      • Re: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedNathan Ward (May 30)
      • Re: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 30)
      • Re: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedIljitsch van Beijnum (May 30)
      • 6bone space used still in the free (www.ietf.org over IPv6 broken) (Was: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)Jeroen Massar (May 30)
      • Re: 6bone space used still in the free (www.ietf.org over IPv6 broken) (Was: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)Mike Leber (May 30)
      • Re: 6bone space used still in the free (www.ietf.org over IPv6 broken) (Was: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)Mike Leber (May 30)
      • RE: 6bone space used still in the free (www.ietf.org over IPv6 broken) (Was: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)James Jun (May 30)
      • Re: 6bone space used still in the free (www.ietf.org over IPv6 broken) (Was: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)virendra rode // (May 30)
      • Re: 6bone space used still in the free (www.ietf.org over IPv6 broken) (Was: why same names, was Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)bmanning (May 30)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedPerry Lorier (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedNathan Ward (May 29)
      • RE: NANOG 40 agenda postedmichael.dillon (May 30)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJohn Curran (May 29)
      • RE: NANOG 40 agenda postedTony Hain (May 30)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedRandy Bush (May 30)
      • dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted]Patrick W. Gilmore (May 30)
      • Re: dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted]Donald Stahl (May 30)
      • Re: dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted]Merike Kaeo (May 30)
      • Re: dual-stack [was: NANOG 40 agenda posted]JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 30)
      • Re: dual-stacksimon (May 31)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJared Mauch (May 30)
      • RE: NANOG 40 agenda postedTony Hain (May 30)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedMark Tinka (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedChris L. Morrow (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedValdis . Kletnieks (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedDonald Stahl (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedNathan Ward (May 29)
      • Testing IPv6 support on th client's machine (Was: NANOG 40 agenda postedStephane Bortzmeyer (May 30)
      • Re: Testing IPv6 support on the client's machine (Was: NANOG 40 agenda postedNathan Ward (May 30)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedChris L. Morrow (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJohn Curran (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedChris L. Morrow (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedDonald Stahl (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedChris L. Morrow (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedDonald Stahl (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedChris L. Morrow (May 29)
      • Message not available
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJohn Curran (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedValdis . Kletnieks (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedChris L. Morrow (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedDonald Stahl (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedAdrian Chadd (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedRandy Bush (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJohn Curran (May 29)
      • Message not available
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedWilliam B. Norton (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJoe Greco (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedRandy Bush (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedChris L. Morrow (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJared Mauch (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedRandy Bush (May 27)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedDonald Stahl (May 28)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedNathan Ward (May 28)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedDonald Stahl (May 28)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJared Mauch (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedKevin Loch (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedmatthew zeier (May 28)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedmatthew zeier (May 28)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedIljitsch van Beijnum (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedChris L. Morrow (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedLarry J. Blunk (May 31)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJeroen Massar (May 31)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedChris L. Morrow (May 31)
      • Re: Content provider plansMichal Krsek (May 30)
      • Re: Content provider plansSean Donelan (May 30)
      • RE: NANOG 40 agenda postedmichael.dillon (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJeroen Massar (May 29)
      • RE: NANOG 40 agenda postedmichael.dillon (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedAdrian Chadd (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedIljitsch van Beijnum (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedDavid W. Hankins (May 30)
      • Re: DHCPv6 and stateless autoconf, was: NANOG 40 agenda postedIljitsch van Beijnum (May 30)
      • Re: DHCPv6 and stateless autoconf, was: NANOG 40 agenda postedDavid W. Hankins (May 30)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedChris L. Morrow (May 30)
      • RE: NANOG 40 agenda postedChris L. Morrow (May 29)
      • RE: NANOG 40 agenda postedmichael.dillon (May 29)
      • RE: NANOG 40 agenda postedmichael.dillon (May 29)
      • RE: NANOG 40 agenda postedChris L. Morrow (May 29)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedJORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 26)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedMartin Hannigan (May 26)
      • Re: NANOG 40 agenda postedChris L. Morrow (May 26)
• swbell DNS admin?Mark Jeftovic (May 25)
  • Re: swbell DNS admin?Dennis Dayman (May 29)
• Rushing into IPv6 Operational Problems? [Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted]Fergie (May 26)
• Re: Moving to IPv6 (Was: NANOG 40 agenda posted)Brandon Butterworth (May 27)
  • Re: Moving to IPv6 (Was: NANOG 40 agenda posted)Jared Mauch (May 27)
• APOPS / SANOG X Call for papersGaurab Raj Upadhaya (May 27)
• Adelphia Postmaster?Kotaro Fukasawa (May 28)
  • Re: Adelphia Postmaster?Dennis Dayman (May 29)
• IPv6 AdvertisementsDonald Stahl (May 28)
  • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsPekka Savola (May 28)
    • Re: IPv6 Advertisementsbmanning (May 29)
    • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsDonald Stahl (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsChris L. Morrow (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsDonald Stahl (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsChris L. Morrow (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsDonald Stahl (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsDavid Conrad (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsDavid Conrad (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsWilliam F. Maton Sotomayor (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsJORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsChris L. Morrow (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsDonald Stahl (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsDale W. Carder (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsDonald Stahl (May 29)
      • RE: IPv6 AdvertisementsBarry Greene (bgreene) (May 30)
      • RE: IPv6 AdvertisementsDonald Stahl (May 30)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsStephen Sprunk (May 30)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsPaul Vixie (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsJeroen Massar (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsJohn Kristoff (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsWilliam F. Maton Sotomayor (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsPaul Vixie (May 29)
      • Message not available
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsWilliam F. Maton Sotomayor (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsJeroen Massar (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsDonald Stahl (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsRandy Bush (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsChris L. Morrow (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsStephen Sprunk (May 31)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsJared Mauch (May 29)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsBrandon Butterworth (May 29)
    • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsDonald Stahl (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsLeo Vegoda (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsDonald Stahl (May 29)
  • RE: IPv6 AdvertisementsAzinger, Marla (May 29)
  • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsBrandon Butterworth (May 29)
    • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsDonald Stahl (May 29)
    • Re: IPv6 Advertisementsbmanning (May 29)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsJoel Jaeggli (May 29)
    • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsStephen Sprunk (May 31)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsDonald Stahl (May 31)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsOwen DeLong (May 31)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsDonald Stahl (May 31)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsStephen Sprunk (May 31)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsDonald Stahl (May 31)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsJeff Kell (May 31)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsStephen Sprunk (May 31)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsDonald Stahl (May 31)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsJeroen Massar (May 31)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsValdis . Kletnieks (May 31)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsJeroen Massar (May 31)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsStephen Sprunk (May 31)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsIljitsch van Beijnum (May 31)
      • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsStephen Sprunk (May 31)
  • Re: IPv6 AdvertisementsBrandon Butterworth (May 29)
• wikiRandy Bush (May 28)
• Advice requestedMatthew Black (May 29)
  • Re: Advice requestedJ. Oquendo (May 29)
  • Re: Advice requestedQuinn Kuzmich (May 29)
    • Re: Advice requestedRandy Bush (May 29)
    • Re: Advice requestedBrandon Galbraith (May 29)
    • Re: Advice requestedDonald Stahl (May 29)
    • RE: Advice requestedmichael.dillon (May 29)
  • Re: Advice requestedJim Popovitch (May 29)
    • Re: Advice requestedPete Ehlke (May 29)
      • Re: Advice requestedK K (May 29)
  • Re: Advice requestedGeorge Imburgia (May 29)
    • Re: Advice requestedJim Popovitch (May 29)
  • Re: Advice requestedAndre Gironda (May 29)
  • Re: Advice requestedRoland Dobbins (May 29)
  • Re: Advice requestedValdis . Kletnieks (May 29)
  • Re: Advice requestedRoy (May 29)
  • Re: Advice requestedAl Iverson (May 29)
    • Re: Advice requestedMarshall Eubanks (May 29)
  • Re: Advice requestedSean Donelan (May 29)
• ULA RegistryJeroen Massar (May 29)
• Re: IPv6 Deployment (Was: Re: NANOG 40 agenda posted)Martin Hannigan (May 29)
• RE: [ppml] A registered ULA policy proposal outlineAzinger, Marla (May 30)
• Sprint - Routing ProblemsMills, Charles (May 30)
  • Re: Sprint - Routing Problemsvirendra rode // (May 30)
• Microsoft and TeredoSean Siler (May 30)
  • Re: Microsoft and Teredomatthew zeier (May 30)
  • Re: Microsoft and TeredoNathan Ward (May 30)
    • Re: Microsoft and TeredoJORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 30)
      • Re: Microsoft and TeredoNathan Ward (May 30)
      • Re: Microsoft and TeredoJORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 30)
    • RE: Microsoft and TeredoSean Siler (May 31)
      • Re: Microsoft and TeredoAdrian Chadd (May 31)
      • Re: Microsoft and TeredoNathan Ward (May 31)
      • RE: Microsoft and Teredomichael.dillon (May 31)
      • Re: Microsoft and TeredoNathan Ward (May 31)
      • RE: Microsoft and TeredoSean Siler (May 31)
      • Re: Microsoft and TeredoJORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 31)
      • Re: Microsoft and TeredoAdrian Chadd (May 31)
      • Re: Microsoft and TeredoJORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 31)
      • Re: Microsoft and TeredoStephen Sprunk (May 31)
      • Re: Microsoft and TeredoNathan Ward (May 31)
      • Re: Microsoft and TeredoJORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 31)
• ULA BoFRandy Bush (May 30)
• Re: IPv6 DeploymentFred Heutte (May 30)
  • Re: IPv6 DeploymentRandy Bush (May 30)
    • Operators: the IETF's Dark GodsDavid W. Hankins (May 31)
      • Re: Operators: the IETF's Dark GodsRoy (May 31)
  • Re: IPv6 DeploymentFred Baker (May 30)
  • Re: IPv6 DeploymentJohn Curran (May 30)
    • Re: IPv6 DeploymentRandy Bush (May 30)
      • Re: IPv6 DeploymentRandy Bush (May 30)
      • Re: IPv6 DeploymentValdis . Kletnieks (May 30)
      • Re: IPv6 DeploymentJohn Curran (May 30)
• Which ISPs Are Spying on You?Hank Nussbacher (May 30)
  • Re: Which ISPs Are Spying on You?Sean Donelan (May 31)
• Lightning talks at NANOG 40!Steve Feldman (May 30)
• Port 1080 probes from AOLup (May 31)
  • Re: Port 1080 probes from AOLSuresh Ramasubramanian (May 31)
• IPv6 Training?Alex Rubenstein (May 31)
  • Re: IPv6 Training?William F. Maton Sotomayor (May 31)
    • Re: IPv6 Training?Lucy Lynch (May 31)
      • RE: IPv6 Training?Tony Hain (May 31)
    • Re: IPv6 Training?JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 31)
      • Re: IPv6 Training?William B. Norton (May 31)
      • Re: IPv6 Training?JORDI PALET MARTINEZ (May 31)
  • RE: IPv6 Training?Scott Morris (May 31)
    • Re: IPv6 Training?Quinn Kuzmich (May 31)
  • Re: IPv6 Training?Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 31)
  • Re: IPv6 Training?Nathan Ward (May 31)
  • Re: IPv6 Training?simon (May 31)

Previous period

Next period