Movatterモバイル変換

nanog: by thread

• RSS Feed
• About List
• All Lists

Previous period

Next period

1204 messagesstarting Mar 31 05 andending Apr 30 05
Date index |Thread index |Author index

• Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Eric A. Hall (Mar 31)
  • Message not available
    • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Eric A. Hall (Mar 31)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Mikael Abrahamsson (Mar 31)
    • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Eric A. Hall (Apr 01)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Eric A. Hall (Mar 31)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )David Barak (Mar 31)
    • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Paul Vixie (Apr 01)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Michael . Dillon (Apr 01)
    • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Niels Bakker (Apr 01)
      • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Michael . Dillon (Apr 01)
      • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Niels Bakker (Apr 01)
    • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )just me (Apr 01)
    • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Owen DeLong (Apr 01)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )David Barak (Apr 01)
    • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Adi Linden (Apr 01)
      • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Bill Nash (Apr 01)
      • Message not available
      • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 01)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Robert Bonomi (Apr 01)
    • Positioning technologyRoy (Apr 01)
      • Re: Positioning technologyJoel Jaeggli (Apr 01)
      • Re: Positioning technologyChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 01)
      • Re: Positioning technologyJoel Jaeggli (Apr 01)
      • Re: Positioning technologyChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 01)
      • Re: Positioning technologyRoy (Apr 01)
      • Re: Positioning technologyRobert M. Enger (Apr 01)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )David Barak (Apr 01)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 01)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 01)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 01)
    • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Paul Vixie (Apr 01)
      • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Randy Bush (Apr 01)
      • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Dan Hollis (Apr 01)
      • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Peter Corlett (Apr 02)
      • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Owen DeLong (Apr 01)
      • Message not available
      • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 03)
  • Re: potpourri (Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP Competitors )Stephen Sprunk (Apr 01)
• SORBS Scanning (unauthorized)Dean Anderson (Mar 31)
• Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net ProcedureJohn Levine (Mar 31)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net ProcedureAlexander Koch (Mar 31)
    • Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net ProcedureBill Woodcock (Apr 01)
      • Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net ProcedureRandy Bush (Apr 01)
      • Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net ProcedureElmar K. Bins (Apr 02)
      • Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net ProcedureDaniel Roesen (Apr 02)
  • Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net ProcedureElmar K. Bins (Apr 01)
  • Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net ProcedureFlorian Weimer (Apr 01)
  • Re: Disappointment at DENIC over Poor Rating in .net ProcedureSimon Waters (Apr 05)
• SORBS lies and new location for SORBS discussionsDean Anderson (Mar 31)
• Re: T1 vs. T2 [WAS: Apology: [Tier-2 reachability and multihoming]]James (Mar 31)
• Re: Topicality Question: VoIPJoe Abley (Mar 31)
• Re: Telcordia report on ICANN .net RFP EvaluationDave Crocker (Mar 31)
  • Re: Telcordia report on ICANN .net RFP EvaluationPatrick W Gilmore (Apr 01)
    • Re: Telcordia report on ICANN .net RFP EvaluationEric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Apr 01)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Telcordia report on ICANN .net RFP EvaluationEdward Lewis (Apr 01)
    • Re: Telcordia report on ICANN .net RFP EvaluationEric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Apr 01)
• Re: Vonage Hits ISP ResistanceMichael . Dillon (Apr 01)
  • Re: Vonage Hits ISP ResistanceStephen Sprunk (Apr 01)
    • Re: Vonage Hits ISP ResistanceBill Nash (Apr 01)
    • Re: Vonage Hits ISP ResistanceAdi Linden (Apr 01)
      • RE: Vonage Hits ISP ResistanceAlexander Kiwerski (Apr 01)
      • RE: Vonage Hits ISP ResistanceAlex Bligh (Apr 01)
      • RE: Vonage Hits ISP ResistanceOwen DeLong (Apr 01)
      • Re: Vonage Hits ISP ResistanceStephen Sprunk (Apr 01)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Vonage Hits ISP ResistanceJay R. Ashworth (Apr 01)
  • Re: Vonage Hits ISP ResistanceJay R. Ashworth (Apr 01)
  • Re: Vonage Hits ISP ResistanceDavid Barak (Apr 01)
    • Re: Vonage Hits ISP ResistanceKevin Oberman (Apr 01)
      • Re: Vonage Hits ISP ResistanceKevin Oberman (Apr 01)
    • Re: Vonage Hits ISP ResistanceOwen DeLong (Apr 01)
    • Message not available
      • Re: Vonage Hits ISP ResistanceJay R. Ashworth (Apr 03)
  • RE: Vonage Hits ISP ResistanceHannigan, Martin (Apr 01)
• P2P Usage Increases was: (Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance)Michael . Dillon (Apr 01)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • P2P Usage Increases was: (Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance)Andrew Odlyzko (Apr 01)
• The Cidr Reportcidr-report (Apr 01)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • The Cidr Reportcidr-report (Apr 08)
  • The Cidr Reportcidr-report (Apr 15)
  • The Cidr Reportcidr-report (Apr 22)
  • The Cidr Reportcidr-report (Apr 29)
• RFC 4041Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 01)
  • Re: RFC 4041william(at)elan.net (Apr 01)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: RFC 4041Howard, W. Lee (Apr 01)
• Re: outage/maintenance window opinionJay R. Ashworth (Apr 01)
• Cisco to merge with NabiscoFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 01)
  • Re: Cisco to merge with NabiscoRobert Boyle (Apr 01)
    • Re: Cisco to merge with NabiscoBill Nash (Apr 01)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cisco to merge with NabiscoJay R. Ashworth (Apr 01)
  • Re: Cisco to merge with NabiscoWayne E. Bouchard (Apr 01)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Cisco to merge with NabiscoDave Hilton (Apr 01)
  • Re: Cisco to merge with NabiscoRobert Bonomi (Apr 01)
  • RE: Cisco to merge with NabiscoChurch, Chuck (Apr 01)
    • RE: Cisco to merge with NabiscoBill Nash (Apr 01)
      • RE: Cisco to merge with NabiscoRobert Boyle (Apr 01)
      • RE: Cisco to merge with NabiscoJay Hennigan (Apr 01)
      • Re: Cisco to merge with NabiscoWayne E. Bouchard (Apr 01)
    • Re: Cisco to merge with NabiscoSteve Sobol (Apr 01)
      • Re: Cisco to merge with NabiscoMichael Moscovitch (Apr 01)
    • RE: Cisco to merge with NabiscoEjay Hire (Apr 01)
  • RE: Cisco to merge with NabiscoDave Hilton (Apr 01)
    • Re: Cisco to merge with NabiscoValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 01)
    • Re: Cisco to merge with NabiscoRichard Cox (Apr 01)
  • Re: Cisco to merge with Nabiscobob (Apr 01)
  • RE: Cisco to merge with NabiscoChurch, Chuck (Apr 01)
    • Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco)Bill Woodcock (Apr 01)
      • Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco)Randy Bush (Apr 01)
      • Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco)Bill Nash (Apr 01)
      • Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco)Joe Provo (Apr 01)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco)Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 01)
      • Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco)John Kristoff (Apr 01)
      • Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco)Randy Bush (Apr 01)
      • Re: Yes, I realize it's April Fools Day, but... (was: Cisco to merge with Nabisco)Randy Bush (Apr 02)
    • RE: Cisco to merge with NabiscoAndy Grosser (Apr 01)
  • Re: Cisco to merge with NabiscoRobert Bonomi (Apr 01)
  • RE: Cisco to merge with NabiscoPendergrass, Greg (Apr 04)
  • RE: Cisco to merge with NabiscoPendergrass, Greg (Apr 04)
    • Re: Cisco to merge with NabiscoRichard Irving (Apr 04)
• .net report slammed againFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 01)
• Weekly Routing Table ReportRouting Table Analysis (Apr 01)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Weekly Routing Table ReportRouting Table Analysis (Apr 08)
  • Re: Weekly Routing Table ReportJoe Loiacono (Apr 08)
    • Re: Weekly Routing Table ReportValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 08)
      • RE: Weekly Routing Table ReportAlexander Kiwerski (Apr 08)
    • Re: Weekly Routing Table ReportPhilip Smith (Apr 08)
  • Weekly Routing Table ReportRouting Table Analysis (Apr 15)
  • Weekly Routing Table ReportRouting Table Analysis (Apr 22)
  • Weekly Routing Table ReportRouting Table Analysis (Apr 29)
• Community Experiences with the InterNIC Whois Data Problem Reports SystemFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 01)
• qwest packet drops?Wyatt Smiarli, Esq. (Apr 01)
• Re: Clearwire May Block VoIP CompetitorsJay R. Ashworth (Apr 01)
• cable management systemsJustin M. Streiner (Apr 01)
• Peribit "sequence reducers" -- do they worth the investment?MARLON BORBA (Apr 01)
• Re: botted hostsRandy Bush (Apr 03)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: botted hostsSean Donelan (Apr 03)
    • Re: botted hostsSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 03)
      • Re: botted hostsSean Donelan (Apr 04)
      • Re: botted hostsAlex Bligh (Apr 04)
      • Message not available
      • Re: botted hostsSean Donelan (Apr 04)
      • Re: botted hostsSimon Waters (Apr 05)
      • Re: botted hostsSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 04)
      • Re: botted hostsFlorian Weimer (Apr 04)
      • Re: botted hostsSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 04)
      • Re: botted hostsPetri Helenius (Apr 05)
      • Re: botted hostsPetri Helenius (Apr 04)
      • Re: botted hostsValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 04)
      • Re: botted hostsPeter Corlett (Apr 04)
      • Re: botted hostsFlorian Weimer (Apr 04)
      • Re: botted hostsPeter Corlett (Apr 04)
      • Re: botted hostsPetri Helenius (Apr 04)
      • RE: botted hostsEjay Hire (Apr 07)
  • Re: botted hostsDave Rand (Apr 04)
    • Re: botted hostsSean Donelan (Apr 04)
      • Message not available
      • Re: botted hostsJay R. Ashworth (Apr 04)
      • Re: botted hostsPaul Vixie (Apr 04)
      • so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts]Gadi Evron (Apr 04)
      • Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts]J.D. Falk (Apr 04)
      • Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts]Gadi Evron (Apr 04)
      • Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts]Petri Helenius (Apr 04)
      • Message not available
      • Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts]Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 04)
      • Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts]John Dupuy (Apr 04)
      • Re: so, how would you justify giving users security?Florian Weimer (Apr 04)
      • Re: so, how would you justify giving users security?Niels Bakker (Apr 05)
      • Re: so, how would you justify giving users security? [was: Re: botted hosts]Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 04)
      • Re: so, how would you justify giving users security?Florian Weimer (Apr 04)
      • Re: so, how would you justify giving users security?Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 05)
      • Re: so, how would you justify giving users security?Florian Weimer (Apr 04)
      • Re: botted hostsFlorian Weimer (Apr 04)
      • Re: botted hostsChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 04)
      • Re: botted hostsDean Anderson (Apr 04)
      • Re: botted hostsValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 04)
      • The power of default configurationsSean Donelan (Apr 06)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsJP Velders (Apr 06)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsFlorian Weimer (Apr 06)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsSean Donelan (Apr 06)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsDuane Wessels (Apr 07)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsPaul Vixie (Apr 07)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsEric A. Hall (Apr 06)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsJon Lewis (Apr 07)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsEric A. Hall (Apr 07)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsJon Lewis (Apr 07)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsEric A. Hall (Apr 07)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsJon Lewis (Apr 07)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsEric A. Hall (Apr 07)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsjust me (Apr 08)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsEric A. Hall (Apr 08)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsMark Andrews (Apr 06)
    • Re: botted hostsSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 04)
    • Re: botted hostsChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 04)
  • Re: botted hostsDean Anderson (Apr 04)
    • Message not available
      • Re: botted hostsJohn Dupuy (Apr 04)
      • Message not available
      • Re: botted hostsJohn Dupuy (Apr 04)
      • Re: botted hostsValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 04)
      • Re: botted hostsChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 04)
    • Re: botted hostsValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 04)
      • Re: botted hostsDean Anderson (Apr 05)
    • Re: botted hostsSam Hayes Merritt, III (Apr 04)
      • Re: botted hostsSimon Waters (Apr 05)
      • Re: botted hostsDean Anderson (Apr 05)
    • Re: botted hostsTony Finch (Apr 05)
      • Re: botted hostsSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 05)
      • Re: botted hostsTony Finch (Apr 05)
      • Re: botted hostsSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 05)
      • Re: botted hostsDean Anderson (Apr 05)
  • Re: botted hostsDean Anderson (Apr 04)
    • Re: botted hostsFlorian Weimer (Apr 04)
  • Re: botted hostsCharles Cala (Apr 05)
• Reminder: NANOG 34 proposals due Monday, April 4Steve Feldman (Apr 03)
• Anyone from btnaccess.com on the list please ping me?Drew Weaver (Apr 03)
• Re: report of .biz outage...Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Apr 04)
  • Re: report of .biz outage...Edward Lewis (Apr 04)
    • Re: report of .biz outage...Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Apr 04)
  • Re: report of .biz outage...Bill Woodcock (Apr 04)
• The Register: .NET report was fudgedFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 04)
• Reports or data on data centres without access to competitive fibreStephen Baxter (Apr 04)
  • Re: Reports or data on data centres without access to competitive fibreAlex Bligh (Apr 05)
• Arrest for cable sabotageSean Donelan (Apr 05)
• RIPE50: Peering BoFCara Mascini (Apr 05)
  • Re: RIPE50: Peering BoFElmar K. Bins (Apr 06)
• ICANN's Questionable Deals Coming Under AttackFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 05)
• The Register: .net report speared a third timeFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 05)
  • Re: The Register: .net report speared a third timeNiels Bakker (Apr 05)
• Keeping up with daylight savings time, datacenter styleBill Woodcock (Apr 06)
• rack-mount tool drawers/chests?Eric A. Hall (Apr 06)
  • RE: rack-mount tool drawers/chests?Mark Borchers (Apr 06)
  • Re: rack-mount tool drawers/chests?Dan Armstrong (Apr 06)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: rack-mount tool drawers/chests?Brandon Butterworth (Apr 06)
• Cisco Security Advisory: Vulnerabilities in the Internet Key Exchange Xauth ImplementationCisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team (Apr 06)
• Cisco Security Advisory: Vulnerabilities in Cisco IOS Secure Shell ServerCisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team (Apr 06)
• Spam (un)blockingAdam Jacob Muller (Apr 06)
  • Re: Spam (un)blockingJ.D. Falk (Apr 06)
  • Re: Spam (un)blockingLarry Smith (Apr 06)
  • Re: Spam (un)blockingJP Velders (Apr 06)
    • Re: Spam (un)blockingDaniel Senie (Apr 06)
      • Re: Spam (un)blockingHank Nussbacher (Apr 06)
    • Re: Spam (un)blockingFlorian Weimer (Apr 07)
    • RE: Spam (un)blockingRichard Jimmerson (Apr 07)
    • Re: Spam (un)blockingMarkus Stumpf (Apr 11)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Spam (un)blockingHoward, W. Lee (Apr 08)
    • Re: Spam (un)blockingSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 08)
• ping from the arone armies listGadi Evron (Apr 06)
• Router choice for medium size hosting providerAlex Campbell (Apr 06)
  • Re: Router choice for medium size hosting providerMark Radabaugh (Apr 06)
    • Re: Router choice for medium size hosting providerBill Woodcock (Apr 06)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Router choice for medium size hosting providerBill Woodcock (Apr 07)
      • Re: Router choice for medium size hosting providerBill Stewart (Apr 13)
• BGP Anywhere - Global RedundancyVandy Hamidi (Apr 06)
  • Re: BGP Anywhere - Global RedundancySteve Gibbard (Apr 06)
  • Re: BGP Anywhere - Global RedundancyKim Onnel (Apr 07)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: BGP Anywhere - Global RedundancyVandy Hamidi (Apr 06)
    • RE: BGP Anywhere - Global RedundancySteve Gibbard (Apr 06)
  • RE: BGP Anywhere - Global RedundancyHoward, W. Lee (Apr 07)
  • RE: BGP Anywhere - Global RedundancyVandy Hamidi (Apr 14)
• Netlantis --- is it ever coming back?John van Oppen (Apr 07)
  • Re: Netlantis --- is it ever coming back?Mathieu Arnold (Apr 07)
    • Re: Netlantis --- is it ever coming back?Pascal Gloor (Apr 07)
• Re: The power of default configurationsAndrew Dul (Apr 07)
  • Re: The power of default configurationsPaul Vixie (Apr 07)
    • Re: The power of default configurationsChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 07)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsPaul Vixie (Apr 07)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsPetri Helenius (Apr 07)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsPaul Vixie (Apr 07)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsPetri Helenius (Apr 07)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 07)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsRandy Bush (Apr 07)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsMichael . Dillon (Apr 08)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsSimon Waters (Apr 08)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsDuane Wessels (Apr 08)
      • Port 0 trafficSean Donelan (Apr 08)
      • Re: Port 0 trafficChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 08)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsSean Donelan (Apr 10)
      • Message not available
      • Re: The power of default configurationsJay R. Ashworth (Apr 10)
      • Re: The power of default configurationsChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 10)
• CingularTom Sands (Apr 07)
• US still leads global spam list according to BBC articleNicole (Apr 07)
• DNS cache poisoning updateFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 07)
  • Re: DNS cache poisoning updateRandy Bush (Apr 07)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DNS cache poisoning updateFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 07)
    • Re: DNS cache poisoning updateGadi Evron (Apr 07)
• Network-Automation discussion mailing list createdBrent Chapman (Apr 07)
  • Re: Network-Automation discussion mailing list createdBill Nash (Apr 07)
    • Re: Network-Automation discussion mailing list createdBrent Chapman (Apr 07)
      • Re: Network-Automation discussion mailing list createdBill Nash (Apr 07)
      • Re: Network-Automation discussion mailing list createdBrent Chapman (Apr 07)
• new operational mailing list - snort signatures for ISP'sGadi Evron (Apr 08)
• AS prependingPhilip Lavine (Apr 08)
  • Re: AS prependingPatrick W Gilmore (Apr 08)
    • Re: AS prependingHank Nussbacher (Apr 09)
  • Re: AS prependingJon Lewis (Apr 08)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: AS prependingchristian . macnevin (Apr 08)
  • Re: AS prependingPhilip Lavine (Apr 08)
    • Re: AS prependingDavid Gethings (Apr 08)
    • Re: AS prependingJon Lewis (Apr 08)
    • Re: AS prependingPete Templin (Apr 08)
  • Re: AS prependingPhilip Lavine (Apr 08)
    • Re: AS prependingDavid Gethings (Apr 08)
    • Re: AS prependingDavid Barak (Apr 08)
• Blog...Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 08)
  • Re: Blog...Susan Harris (Apr 08)
  • Re: Blog...Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Apr 08)
    • Re: Blog...Bill Woodcock (Apr 08)
      • Re: Blog...Michael . Dillon (Apr 11)
      • Re: Blog...Bruce Pinsky (Apr 11)
      • Re: Blog...Randy Bush (Apr 11)
      • Re: Blog...Chris Boyd (Apr 11)
  • Re: Blog...Randy Bush (Apr 08)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Blog...Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 09)
• Botted Hosts tracking, v0.01alphaEjay Hire (Apr 08)
• djbdns: An alternative to BINDVicky Rode (Apr 08)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDPaul Vixie (Apr 08)
    • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDJohn Kinsella (Apr 08)
    • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDNiek (Apr 08)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDDragos Ruiu (Apr 08)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDPaul Vixie (Apr 08)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDDavid Conrad (Apr 09)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDNiels Bakker (Apr 09)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDWill Yardley (Apr 09)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDPaul Vixie (Apr 09)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDDavid Conrad (Apr 09)
    • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 08)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDChris Kuethe (Apr 08)
    • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDNathan Ward (Apr 08)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDNiek (Apr 08)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 08)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDNiek (Apr 08)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 08)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDPaul Vixie (Apr 08)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDsthaug (Apr 09)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDSimon Waters (Apr 11)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDTobias Reckhard (Apr 11)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 08)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDAdam McKenna (Apr 08)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDPaul Vixie (Apr 08)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDVicky Rode (Apr 08)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDRandy Bush (Apr 08)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDSteve Atkins (Apr 08)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDStephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 09)
    • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDPaul Wouters (Apr 09)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDDean Anderson (Apr 11)
    • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDwilliam(at)elan.net (Apr 11)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDDean Anderson (Apr 11)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDwilliam(at)elan.net (Apr 11)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDKevin Oberman (Apr 11)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDwilliam(at)elan.net (Apr 11)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDDean Anderson (Apr 11)
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDJay R. Ashworth (Apr 12)
      • Message not available
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDJay R. Ashworth (Apr 12)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDDean Anderson (Apr 12)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 12)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDMichael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Apr 12)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDDean Anderson (Apr 13)
      • RE: djbdns: An alternative to BINDNeil J. McRae (Apr 13)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDDavid Conrad (Apr 11)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDPaul Vixie (Apr 11)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDDean Anderson (Apr 11)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDMark Boolootian (Apr 11)
      • Message not available
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDJay R. Ashworth (Apr 12)
      • RE: djbdns: An alternative to BINDandrew2 (Apr 11)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDPaul Vixie (Apr 11)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDDean Anderson (Apr 11)
      • Message not available
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDJay R. Ashworth (Apr 12)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDDean Anderson (Apr 12)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDW.D.McKinney (Apr 08)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDRoger Marquis (Apr 09)
    • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDEtaoin Shrdlu (Apr 09)
    • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDStefan Schmidt (Apr 09)
      • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDPaul Vixie (Apr 10)
    • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDRobert Boyle (Apr 09)
    • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDsthaug (Apr 09)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDDean Anderson (Apr 11)
  • Re: djbdns: An alternative to BINDDean Anderson (Apr 11)
  • RE: djbdns: An alternative to BINDMalayter, Christopher (Apr 11)
• books every network operator should read?Janet Sullivan (Apr 08)
  • Re: books every network operator should read?Kim Onnel (Apr 09)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: books every network operator should read?Paul Jasa (Apr 08)
  • Re: books every network operator should read?MARLON BORBA (Apr 09)
  • Re: books every network operator should read?Roger Marquis (Apr 09)
    • RE: books every network operator should read?Eric Pylko (Apr 11)
      • Re: books every network operator should read?Robert E . Seastrom (Apr 12)
• Call for Track Chairs - APRICOT 2006Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 09)
• clued/interested LEO listGadi Evron (Apr 10)
  • Re: clued/interested LEO listjoe mcguckin (Apr 10)
    • Re: clued/interested LEO listPetri Helenius (Apr 10)
      • Re: clued/interested LEO listGadi Evron (Apr 10)
      • Re: clued/interested LEO listPetri Helenius (Apr 10)
  • Re: clued/interested LEO listwilliam(at)elan.net (Apr 10)
    • Re: clued/interested LEO listHank Nussbacher (Apr 10)
      • Re: clued/interested LEO listGadi Evron (Apr 11)
    • Re: clued/interested LEO listGadi Evron (Apr 11)
• (half OT) Tool for ASN statistic freaks: webalizer_asnFredy Kuenzler (Apr 10)
• SORBS Identity theft alertDean Anderson (Apr 10)
  • Re: SORBS Identity theft alertBill Nash (Apr 10)
    • Re: SORBS Identity theft alertEdward B. Dreger (Apr 11)
      • Re: SORBS Identity theft alertRandy Bush (Apr 11)
      • Re: SORBS Identity theft alertBill Nash (Apr 11)
      • Re: SORBS Identity theft alertDan Hollis (Apr 11)
  • Re: SORBS Identity theft alertAndrew D Kirch (Apr 11)
    • Re: SORBS Identity theft alertElmar K. Bins (Apr 11)
    • Re: SORBS Identity theft alertDean Anderson (Apr 11)
    • Re: SORBS Identity theft alertDean Anderson (Apr 11)
    • Re: SORBS Identity theft alertJ.D. Falk (Apr 11)
  • Re: SORBS Identity theft alertMatthew Sullivan (Apr 11)
• Maybe OT: MPLS QOS SLA Monitoringchristian . macnevin (Apr 11)
  • Re: Maybe OT: MPLS QOS SLA MonitoringBill Nash (Apr 11)
• Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.just me (Apr 11)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.just me (Apr 11)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.just me (Apr 11)
    • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.william(at)elan.net (Apr 11)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 12)
      • RE: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.Luke Youngblood (Apr 12)
      • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.Steven M. Bellovin (Apr 12)
      • RE: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.just me (Apr 12)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.just me (Apr 11)
    • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.Matthew S. Hallacy (Apr 11)
      • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.just me (Apr 11)
      • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.Bill Woodcock (Apr 11)
      • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.Randy Bush (Apr 11)
      • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.just me (Apr 11)
  • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.Michael . Dillon (Apr 12)
    • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.Niels Bakker (Apr 12)
      • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.JC Dill (Apr 12)
    • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.Dean Anderson (Apr 12)
      • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.Jared Mauch (Apr 12)
    • Re: Dear Linksys: Your broken WET54GS5 makes me sad.Steve Sobol (Apr 12)
• Today's tech highlightsFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 11)
• article: port 25 blockingGadi Evron (Apr 11)
  • Re: article: port 25 blockingSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 12)
    • Re: article: port 25 blockingGadi Evron (Apr 12)
• ICMP VulnerabilityHannigan, Martin (Apr 12)
  • Re: ICMP VulnerabilityDean Anderson (Apr 12)
  • Re: ICMP VulnerabilityGwendolynn ferch Elydyr (Apr 12)
    • Re: ICMP VulnerabilityAlex Bligh (Apr 12)
      • Re: ICMP VulnerabilityAlexei Roudnev (Apr 13)
    • Re: ICMP VulnerabilityGwendolynn ferch Elydyr (Apr 12)
      • Re: ICMP VulnerabilityGwendolynn ferch Elydyr (Apr 12)
• Hotmail-- Again??Jim McBurnett (Apr 12)
  • Re: Hotmail-- Again??Scott Grayban (Apr 12)
  • Re: Hotmail-- Again??Matthew Black (Apr 12)
    • Re: Hotmail-- Again??Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 12)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Hotmail-- Again??Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 12)
      • Re: Hotmail-- Again??Matthew Black (Apr 13)
• ID theft rabbit hole gets deeper....Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 12)
• Today's tech news highlights....Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 12)
  • Re: Today's tech news highlights....Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 12)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Today's tech news highlights....Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 15)
• Fwd: [e2e] Wisconsin network research lab now openly availableFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 12)
• Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP AllocationFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 12)
  • Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP AllocationGordon Cook (Apr 12)
    • Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP AllocationMichael . Dillon (Apr 13)
      • Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP AllocationDave Crocker (Apr 13)
      • Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP AllocationRandy Bush (Apr 13)
      • Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP AllocationValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 13)
      • Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP AllocationDoug Barton (Apr 13)
      • Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP AllocationEric A. Hall (Apr 13)
      • Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP AllocationMichael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Apr 13)
  • Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP AllocationEric A. Hall (Apr 13)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP AllocationHannigan, Martin (Apr 13)
• New IANA IPv4 allocation for ARIN (73/8)Doug Barton (Apr 12)
• New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)Doug Barton (Apr 12)
  • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)Jeroen Massar (Apr 13)
    • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)Doug Barton (Apr 13)
    • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 13)
  • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)John Palmer (Apr 13)
    • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)Steve Meuse (Apr 13)
      • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)Gary E. Miller (Apr 13)
      • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)Scott Weeks (Apr 13)
      • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)John Palmer (Apr 13)
      • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)Scott Weeks (Apr 13)
      • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)Nils Ketelsen (Apr 13)
      • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)Hank Nussbacher (Apr 13)
      • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)Richard Cox (Apr 13)
      • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)Randy Bush (Apr 13)
      • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)Dan Hollis (Apr 13)
      • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)Richard Cox (Apr 13)
      • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)Steve Meuse (Apr 13)
      • Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8)Randy Bush (Apr 13)
      • where 419 scams come from (was: Re: New IANA IPv4 allocation to AfriNIC (41/8))Steven Champeon (Apr 13)
• New block of AS Numbers to AfriNIC (36864 - 37887)Doug Barton (Apr 12)
• New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 13)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersIrwin Lazar (Apr 13)
  • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersPeter John Hill (Apr 13)
    • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersBrandon Ross (Apr 13)
    • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersMichael . Dillon (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersNiels Bakker (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersMichael . Dillon (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersBrandon Ross (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersSean Donelan (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersPeter John Hill (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersDaniel Senie (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersJim Popovitch (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersPeter John Hill (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersSteve Sobol (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersPeter John Hill (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 14)
      • RE: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersAlexander Kiwerski (Apr 14)
      • RE: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersBrandon Ross (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersJohn Payne (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersNiels Bakker (Apr 15)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersBrandon Ross (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersBrandon Ross (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersJeff Cole (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersJerry Pasker (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersPatrick W Gilmore (Apr 14)
      • Six PCs caused BigPond problemsSean Donelan (Apr 14)
      • Re: Six PCs caused BigPond problemsPatrick W Gilmore (Apr 14)
      • Re: Six PCs caused BigPond problemsBill Stewart (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersJerry Pasker (Apr 14)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersDaniel Golding (Apr 15)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersAdrian Chadd (Apr 15)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersPatrick W Gilmore (Apr 15)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersDaniel Golding (Apr 15)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersPetri Helenius (Apr 15)
      • Re: New Outage Hits Comcast SubscribersBrandon Ross (Apr 15)
• Comcast ContactRoss Hosman (Apr 13)
  • Re: Comcast ContactScott Grayban (Apr 13)
  • Re: Comcast ContactSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 13)
    • NOC-DBA Phone (was Re: Comcast Contact)Jeffrey I. Schiller (Apr 13)
      • Re: INOC-DBA Phone (was Re: Comcast Contact)Bill Woodcock (Apr 13)
• Re: Auerbach Accuses ICANN Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP AllocationFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 13)
• Today's tech news highlightsFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 13)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Today's tech news highlightsFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 14)
• OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentJonas Frey (Apr 14)
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentwilliam(at)elan.net (Apr 14)
    • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentJonas Frey (Apr 14)
    • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentAlexander Koch (Apr 14)
    • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentNeil J. McRae (Apr 14)
    • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentFredy Kuenzler (Apr 14)
  • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentNeil J. McRae (Apr 14)
    • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentRichard A Steenbergen (Apr 14)
      • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentNeil J. McRae (Apr 14)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentRichard A Steenbergen (Apr 14)
    • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentPatrick W Gilmore (Apr 14)
    • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentSteve Gibbard (Apr 14)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentRichard A Steenbergen (Apr 14)
      • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentNeil J. McRae (Apr 14)
      • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentDaniel Senie (Apr 14)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentAlexander Koch (Apr 14)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentPatrick W Gilmore (Apr 14)
      • Partial Transit (was Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent)Deepak Jain (Apr 14)
      • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentNeil J. McRae (Apr 15)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentRichard A Steenbergen (Apr 14)
      • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentNeil J. McRae (Apr 14)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentPatrick W Gilmore (Apr 14)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentRichard A Steenbergen (Apr 14)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentPatrick W Gilmore (Apr 14)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentStephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentDaniel Golding (Apr 14)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentPaul Vixie (Apr 15)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentFredy Kuenzler (Apr 15)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentTom Vest (Apr 15)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentPatrick W. Gilmore (Apr 15)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentStephen J. Wilcox (Apr 16)
      • cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent)Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 16)
      • cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent)jmalcolm (Apr 16)
      • Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent)Mike Leber (Apr 17)
      • Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent)Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 17)
      • Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent)Randy Bush (Apr 17)
      • Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent)Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 17)
      • Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent)Marshall Eubanks (Apr 17)
      • Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent)Randy Bush (Apr 17)
      • Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent)Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 17)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentSteve Gibbard (Apr 16)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentJonas Frey (Apr 17)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentMichael . Dillon (Apr 18)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentFredy Kuenzler (Apr 16)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentDaniel Roesen (Apr 14)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentGerman Martinez (Apr 14)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentDaniel Roesen (Apr 14)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentDaniel Roesen (Apr 14)
      • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentDavid Schwartz (Apr 14)
      • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentNeil J. McRae (Apr 15)
      • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentJonas Frey (Apr 15)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentDaniel Golding (Apr 14)
  • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentJohn van Oppen (Apr 17)
    • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentPatrick W. Gilmore (Apr 17)
      • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentPatrick W. Gilmore (Apr 17)
    • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentPeter & Karin Dambier (Apr 18)
      • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentStephen J. Wilcox (Apr 18)
  • RE: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentJohn van Oppen (Apr 17)
    • Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogentMichael Sinatra (Apr 17)
• IANA IPv4 allocations and bogon update: 41/8Rob Thomas (Apr 14)
• AUP for NANOG?Matthew Black (Apr 14)
  • Re: AUP for NANOG?Randy Bush (Apr 14)
  • Re: AUP for NANOG?Edward Lewis (Apr 14)
  • Re: AUP for NANOG?Chris Kuethe (Apr 14)
    • Re: AUP for NANOG?Randy Bush (Apr 14)
      • Re: AUP for NANOG?Romain Komorn (Apr 14)
      • Re: AUP for NANOG?Scott Grayban (Apr 14)
      • Re: AUP for NANOG?Bill Nash (Apr 14)
      • Re: AUP for NANOG?Steve Gibbard (Apr 14)
      • Message not available
      • Best Practices Knowledge Capture (was: Re: AUP for NANOG?)Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 15)
      • Comment for new folks and posting [was: AUP for NANOG?]Scott Weeks (Apr 14)
      • Re: AUP for NANOG?Per Gregers Bilse (Apr 15)
  • Re: AUP for NANOG?Susan Harris (Apr 14)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: AUP for NANOG?Hannigan, Martin (Apr 14)
  • Re: AUP for NANOG?Gregory Hicks (Apr 15)
    • Re: AUP for NANOG?John Dupuy (Apr 15)
• Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Dan Lockwood (Apr 14)
  • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Luke Youngblood (Apr 14)
    • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Randy Bush (Apr 14)
    • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Jay Hennigan (Apr 14)
    • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Jim Popovitch (Apr 14)
    • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 14)
      • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
      • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Randy Bush (Apr 14)
      • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 14)
      • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Patrick W Gilmore (Apr 14)
      • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Jim Popovitch (Apr 14)
      • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Steven M. Bellovin (Apr 14)
      • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Bill Stewart (Apr 14)
      • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Michael . Dillon (Apr 15)
      • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?jmalcolm (Apr 16)
      • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Michael . Dillon (Apr 18)
      • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Jerry Pasker (Apr 14)
      • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Justin M. Streiner (Apr 14)
      • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?David Lesher (Apr 15)
      • N+? redundancyMichael . Dillon (Apr 15)
      • N+? redundancyjmalcolm (Apr 16)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 17)
      • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?just me (Apr 17)
  • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Matthew Crocker (Apr 14)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Hannigan, Martin (Apr 14)
  • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Hannigan, Martin (Apr 14)
  • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Dan Lockwood (Apr 14)
    • Re: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Bill Stewart (Apr 14)
  • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Dan Lockwood (Apr 14)
  • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Hannigan, Martin (Apr 15)
    • RE: Anyone familiar with the SBC product lingo?Michael . Dillon (Apr 15)
• SONETDavid Barak (Apr 14)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SONETsgorman1 (Apr 14)
• Postini Problems?Lanny Jason Godsey (Apr 14)
  • Re: Postini Problems?Martin Hepworth (Apr 15)
    • Re: Postini Problems?John Levine (Apr 15)
• New international IPv6 operators forumDaniel Roesen (Apr 14)
• fwd: Cobell lawyers ask trust systems be shutdown again (3rd time)Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Apr 14)
• Microsoft SOHO router multicast problem? - or maybe it's just doing what it's supposed to be doing...Mark Radabaugh (Apr 14)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Microsoft SOHO router multicast problem? - or maybe it's just doing what it's supposed to be doing...Mark Radabaugh (Apr 15)
• Re: Six PCs caused BigPond problemsFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 15)
• RE: MD5 for TCP/BGP SessionsDoug Legge (Apr 15)
• Re: N+? redundancyMichael . Dillon (Apr 15)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: N+? redundancysgorman1 (Apr 18)
    • Re: N+? redundancyMichael . Dillon (Apr 18)
• Service providers that NAT their whole network?Philip Matthews (Apr 15)
  • Message not available
    • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 15)
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?Jon Lewis (Apr 15)
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?Andrew - Supernews (Apr 15)
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?sjk (Apr 15)
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?Steve Meuse (Apr 15)
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?Bill Woodcock (Apr 15)
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?Scott Call (Apr 15)
    • Message not available
      • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 15)
      • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?Jeff Kell (Apr 15)
    • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?Chris Woodfield (Apr 22)
      • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?John Payne (Apr 22)
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?Philip Matthews (Apr 19)
    • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?Owen DeLong (Apr 19)
      • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?Tom Vest (Apr 19)
      • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 19)
      • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?Tom Vest (Apr 19)
      • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 19)
      • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?Tom Vest (Apr 19)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Service providers that NAT their whole network?Reeves, Rob (Apr 15)
  • Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?christian . macnevin (Apr 18)
• RFC1918 in-addr.arpa local copiesForrest W. Christian (Apr 15)
  • Re: RFC1918 in-addr.arpa local copiesChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 15)
  • Re: RFC1918 in-addr.arpa local copiesPaul Vixie (Apr 15)
• Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent)Brandon Butterworth (Apr 16)
  • Re: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent)jmalcolm (Apr 17)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent)Hannigan, Martin (Apr 17)
    • RE: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent)jmalcolm (Apr 17)
• Hostway Network Security ContactAaron Glenn (Apr 16)
• Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problemsSean Donelan (Apr 16)
  • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problemsFlorian Weimer (Apr 17)
    • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problemsEric A. Hall (Apr 17)
      • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problemsDavid Conrad (Apr 17)
  • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problemsEric A. Hall (Apr 17)
  • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problemsEric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Apr 18)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problemsFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 17)
    • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problemsFlorian Weimer (Apr 17)
  • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problemsFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 17)
    • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problemsSteven M. Bellovin (Apr 17)
      • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problemsMartin J. Levy (Apr 17)
      • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problemsDaniel Golding (Apr 18)
      • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problemsFlorian Weimer (Apr 18)
      • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problemsJason Frisvold (Apr 18)
    • Re: Memory leak cause of Comcast DNS problemsChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 17)
• grrrScott Grayban (Apr 16)
  • Re: grrrjust me (Apr 17)
    • Re: grrrDavid Lesher (Apr 17)
      • Re: grrrFlorian Weimer (Apr 17)
      • Re: grrrOwen DeLong (Apr 17)
      • Re: grrrWill Yardley (Apr 17)
    • Re: grrrJerry Pasker (Apr 17)
• Topics for NANOG 34Steve Feldman (Apr 17)
  • Re: Topics for NANOG 34william(at)elan.net (Apr 17)
    • Re: Topics for NANOG 34Steve Feldman (Apr 17)
• BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NASKim Onnel (Apr 17)
  • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NASSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 17)
  • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NASRandy Bush (Apr 17)
    • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NASChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 17)
      • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NASRandy Bush (Apr 17)
      • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NASChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 17)
      • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NASSean Donelan (Apr 17)
    • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NASJ.D. Falk (Apr 17)
      • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NASKim Onnel (Apr 17)
      • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NASChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 17)
      • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NASRandy Bush (Apr 17)
      • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NASSean Donelan (Apr 17)
  • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NASJohn Kristoff (Apr 17)
    • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NASJ.D. Falk (Apr 17)
      • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NASSteven M. Bellovin (Apr 17)
      • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NASJohn Kristoff (Apr 17)
      • Re: BCP for ISP to block worms at PEs and NASChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 17)
• Re: cost of doing businessAndrew Odlyzko (Apr 17)
  • Re: cost of doing businessJoe Abley (Apr 18)
    • Re: cost of doing businessMikael Abrahamsson (Apr 18)
      • Re: cost of doing businessJoe Abley (Apr 18)
  • Re: cost of doing businessThomas Kernen (Apr 18)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: cost of doing businessThomas Kernen (Apr 18)
    • Re: cost of doing businessMarshall Eubanks (Apr 19)
      • Re: cost of doing businessThomas Kernen (Apr 19)
      • Re: cost of doing businessMarshall Eubanks (Apr 19)
• RE: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent)Malayter, Christopher (Apr 17)
  • RE: cost of doing business (was:Re: OpenTransit (france telecom) depeers cogent)Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 17)
• ATT.net Security ContactJoseph W. Breu (Apr 17)
  • Re: ATT.net Security ContactMike Tancsa (Apr 17)
• IX Panel for SeattleMalayter, Christopher (Apr 18)
• DSCP ECN bitschristian . macnevin (Apr 18)
  • Re: DSCP ECN bitsVicky Rode (Apr 18)
• Security Concerns Boosted VeriSign's Dot-Net BidFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 18)
  • Re: Security Concerns Boosted VeriSign's Dot-Net BidScott Grayban (Apr 18)
• Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsJay R. Ashworth (Apr 18)
  • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsPatrick W. Gilmore (Apr 18)
    • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsChris Adams (Apr 18)
      • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsPatrick W. Gilmore (Apr 18)
      • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsChris Adams (Apr 18)
      • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsPatrick W. Gilmore (Apr 18)
      • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsEric Louie (Apr 18)
      • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsDaniel Golding (Apr 18)
      • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsJason Frisvold (Apr 18)
      • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsMikael Abrahamsson (Apr 18)
      • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsFlorian Weimer (Apr 18)
      • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsJason Frisvold (Apr 18)
      • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsMatthew Sullivan (Apr 18)
      • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsRandy Bush (Apr 18)
      • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsRachael Treu Gomes (Apr 18)
      • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsFlorian Weimer (Apr 18)
      • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsPeter & Karin Dambier (Apr 18)
      • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsTony Rall (Apr 18)
      • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsJC Dill (Apr 19)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsErik Amundson (Apr 18)
    • Re: Jonathan Yarden @ TechRepublic: Disable DNS caching on workstationsPaul G (Apr 18)
• Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast...Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 18)
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast...Bruce Pinsky (Apr 18)
    • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast...Jeff Rosowski (Apr 18)
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast...Alex Rubenstein (Apr 18)
    • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast...Jared Mauch (Apr 18)
    • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast...Andy Johnson (Apr 18)
      • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast...Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 18)
      • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast...just me (Apr 18)
      • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast...Steve Sobol (Apr 18)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast...Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 19)
      • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast...Chris Woodfield (Apr 23)
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast...Matt Taber (Apr 19)
    • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast...Alex Rubenstein (Apr 19)
      • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast...Jason Slagle (Apr 19)
      • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast...Matt Taber (Apr 19)
      • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast...Bill Stewart (Apr 24)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast...Robert Bonomi (Apr 18)
• Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competitionFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 18)
  • Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competitionJustin M. Streiner (Apr 19)
    • Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competitionAlex Rubenstein (Apr 19)
      • Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competitionwilliam(at)elan.net (Apr 19)
      • Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competitionAlex Rubenstein (Apr 19)
      • Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competitionJustin M. Streiner (Apr 19)
      • Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competitionwilliam(at)elan.net (Apr 26)
      • Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competitionSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 19)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Qwest protests SBC-AT&T merger as harmful to competitionwilliam(at)elan.net (Apr 19)
• Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Fergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 19)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Jim Popovitch (Apr 19)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Crist Clark (Apr 19)
    • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Dean Anderson (Apr 20)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?sthaug (Apr 20)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Dean Anderson (Apr 20)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Chris Adams (Apr 20)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 20)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Dean Anderson (Apr 22)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 20)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Dean Anderson (Apr 22)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 23)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Crist Clark (Apr 20)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Dean Anderson (Apr 20)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 20)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?sthaug (Apr 20)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Steve Gibbard (Apr 20)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?sthaug (Apr 20)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Dean Anderson (Apr 20)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 20)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Dean Anderson (Apr 22)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 22)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Steve Gibbard (Apr 22)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? PPLB is not a good thingRobert M. Enger (Apr 23)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 22)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Dean Anderson (Apr 22)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 22)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Dean Anderson (Apr 23)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?James (Apr 23)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Niels Bakker (Apr 23)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 23)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Bill Stewart (Apr 24)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 24)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?sthaug (Apr 24)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 24)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Robert M. Enger (Apr 24)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?sthaug (Apr 24)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Robert M. Enger (Apr 24)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Steve Gibbard (Apr 24)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 25)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Dean Anderson (Apr 29)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 29)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Dean Anderson (Apr 29)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?sthaug (Apr 30)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Dean Anderson (Apr 30)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Dean Anderson (Apr 30)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?James (Apr 30)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Dean Anderson (Apr 30)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 25)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 24)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Edward B. Dreger (Apr 26)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Edward B. Dreger (Apr 26)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?Dean Anderson (Apr 29)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?alex (Apr 23)
      • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL?James (Apr 22)
• Ameritrade warns 200,000 clients of lost dataFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 19)
  • Re: Ameritrade warns 200,000 clients of lost dataAlex Rubenstein (Apr 19)
    • Re: Ameritrade warns 200,000 clients of lost dataFlorian Weimer (Apr 19)
    • Re: Ameritrade warns 200,000 clients of lost dataDouglas Otis (Apr 19)
  • Re: Ameritrade warns 200,000 clients of lost dataAlex Rubenstein (Apr 19)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Ameritrade warns 200,000 clients of lost dataFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 19)
• New IPv6 allocations from IANA to RIPE NCC (2a00::/21) and ARIN (2600::/22, 2604::/22, 2608::/22, 260c::/22)Doug Barton (Apr 19)
• Verizon's DSL Still Partially ClothedFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 19)
• Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etcSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 19)
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etcMichael Loftis (Apr 19)
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etcHank Nussbacher (Apr 19)
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etcSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 25)
    • CircleID, was: Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etcDaniel Golding (Apr 26)
    • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etcScott Weeks (Apr 27)
      • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etcRandy Bush (Apr 27)
      • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etcScott Weeks (Apr 27)
      • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etcbmanning (Apr 27)
      • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANNStephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 28)
      • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANNAlex Bligh (Apr 28)
      • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANNScott W Brim (Apr 28)
      • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANNAlex Bligh (Apr 28)
      • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANNDoug Barton (Apr 28)
      • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANNMichael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Apr 28)
      • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANNIljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 28)
      • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etcRandy Bush (Apr 27)
      • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etcSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 27)
  • Re: Paul Wilson and Geoff Huston of APNIC on IP address allocation ITU v/s ICANN etcLeo Bicknell (Apr 27)
• Promosis? Who are these guys?Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 20)
  • Re: Promosis? Who are these guys?Florian Weimer (Apr 20)
  • Re: Promosis? Who are these guys?Douglas Otis (Apr 20)
• FW: [ipv6-wg () ripe net] [afnog] New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCCLeslie Nobile (Apr 20)
• Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (fwd)Dean Anderson (Apr 20)
  • Re: Slashdot: Providers Ignoring DNS TTL? (fwd)Matt Buford (Apr 20)
• RIPE NCC to begin allocating from 87/8leo vegoda (Apr 20)
• This fall in LASusan Harris (Apr 20)
• Yahoo mail ops contactjust me (Apr 20)
• Getting a BGP table in to a labNathan Ward (Apr 20)
  • RE: Getting a BGP table in to a labScott Morris (Apr 20)
    • RE: Getting a BGP table in to a labBill Nash (Apr 20)
    • RE: Getting a BGP table in to a labScott Morris (Apr 20)
    • Re: Getting a BGP table in to a laberic-list-nanog (Apr 20)
  • Re: Getting a BGP table in to a labSteven M. Bellovin (Apr 21)
  • Re: Getting a BGP table in to a labNathan Ward (Apr 21)
  • Re: Getting a BGP table in to a labNathan Ward (Apr 21)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Getting a BGP table in to a labFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 20)
  • RE: Getting a BGP table in to a labFrotzler, Florian (Apr 21)
  • RE: Getting a BGP table in to a labReeves, Rob (Apr 21)
    • Re: Getting a BGP table in to a labOkan Demirmen (Apr 21)
    • Re: Getting a BGP table in to a labArnold Nipper (Apr 21)
      • Re: Getting a BGP table in to a labAndre Oppermann (Apr 21)
      • Re: Getting a BGP table in to a labDaniel Roesen (Apr 21)
  • RE: Getting a BGP table in to a labReeves, Rob (Apr 21)
• AW: Getting a BGP table in to a labJohn van Oppen (Apr 21)
• Load balance over multiple bgp feedsMike Hyde (Apr 21)
  • Re: Load balance over multiple bgp feedsWill Yardley (Apr 21)
    • Re: Load balance over multiple bgp feedsWill Yardley (Apr 21)
  • Re: Load balance over multiple bgp feedsOlivier Bonaventure (Apr 23)
• New worm?Chris Boyd (Apr 21)
  • Re: New worm?Jon Lewis (Apr 21)
  • Re: New worm?Peter John Hill (Apr 22)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: New worm?Chris Boyd (Apr 21)
    • Re: New worm?Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 21)
      • Re: New worm?Chris Boyd (Apr 21)
      • Re: New worm?Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 21)
      • Re: New worm?Adi Linden (Apr 22)
• Any supply a live contact for mac.com?D. Campbell MacInnes (Apr 22)
• Root DNS serversJoseph Nuara (Apr 22)
  • Re: Root DNS serversbmanning (Apr 22)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Root DNS serversPeter & Karin Dambier (Apr 22)
  • RE: Root DNS serversGraeme Clark (Apr 22)
  • RE: Root DNS serversHannigan, Martin (Apr 22)
• Root DNS Servers 2Joseph Nuara (Apr 22)
  • Re: Root DNS Servers 2Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 22)
    • Re: Root DNS Servers 2Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 22)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Root DNS Servers 2Greg Schwimer (Apr 23)
• Dual rackmountable power supply?Mike Sawicki (Apr 22)
  • Re: Dual rackmountable power supply?Arnold Nipper (Apr 22)
  • Re: Dual rackmountable power supply?william(at)elan.net (Apr 22)
  • Re: Dual rackmountable power supply?alex (Apr 22)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Dual rackmountable power supply?Hannigan, Martin (Apr 22)
• AW: Dual rackmountable power supply?John van Oppen (Apr 22)
• Re: [dnsop] Re: Root Anycast (fwd)Dean Anderson (Apr 23)
• DNS Round RobinRoy (Apr 23)
  • Re: DNS Round RobinFlorian Weimer (Apr 25)
    • Re: DNS Round RobinTodd Vierling (Apr 25)
• gigabit residentialPetri Helenius (Apr 24)
• [Fwd: Re: [Full-disclosure] Possible Virus activity]Austin McKinley (Apr 24)
• versions, filtering, and access OH MY!!bmanning (Apr 25)
  • Re: versions, filtering, and access OH MY!!Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 25)
• Problems with NS*.worldnic.comGreg Schwimer (Apr 25)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comaljuhani (Apr 25)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comRandy Bush (Apr 25)
    • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comMatt Larson (Apr 25)
      • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comJanet Sullivan (Apr 25)
    • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comRodney Joffe (Apr 25)
      • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 25)
      • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comKevin Loch (Apr 26)
      • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 25)
      • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comRandy Bush (Apr 25)
      • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comwilliam(at)elan.net (Apr 25)
      • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 26)
      • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comEdward Lewis (Apr 26)
    • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comJerry Pasker (Apr 25)
      • Message not available
      • The "not long discussion" thread....Jerry Pasker (Apr 26)
      • Re: The "not long discussion" thread....Steve Sobol (Apr 26)
      • Re: The "not long discussion" thread....Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 26)
      • Re: The "not long discussion" thread....Jerry Pasker (Apr 27)
      • Re: The "not long discussion" thread....Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 27)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comGraeme Clark (Apr 25)
    • RE: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 25)
    • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comSimon Waters (Apr 26)
      • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 26)
      • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comRandy Bush (Apr 26)
      • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comPeter Corlett (Apr 26)
      • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 26)
      • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comSteven M. Bellovin (Apr 26)
      • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comaljuhani (Apr 26)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 26)
  • Re: Problems with NS*.worldnic.comFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 25)
• FW: Port 25 - BlacklashPaul Ryan (Apr 26)
  • Re: FW: Port 25 - BlacklashMatt Ghali (Apr 26)
  • Re: FW: Port 25 - BlacklashEric Gauthier (Apr 26)
    • Re: Port 25 - BlacklashAdam Jacob Muller (Apr 26)
      • Re: Port 25 - BlacklashHank Nussbacher (Apr 26)
      • Re: Port 25 - BlacklashValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 26)
      • Re: Port 25 - BlacklashDaniel Golding (Apr 26)
      • Re: Port 25 - BlacklashAlexei Roudnev (Apr 27)
      • Re: Port 25 - BlacklashJoel Jaeggli (Apr 27)
      • Re: Port 25 - BlacklashSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 27)
      • Re: Port 25 - BlacklashJoe Maimon (Apr 27)
      • Re: Port 25 - BlacklashValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 27)
      • Re: Port 25 - BlacklashSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 27)
      • Re: Port 25 - BlacklashMatthew S. Hallacy (Apr 27)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Port 25 - BlacklashHannigan, Martin (Apr 26)
    • Re: Port 25 - BlacklashFlorian Weimer (Apr 26)
  • RE: Port 25 - BlacklashHannigan, Martin (Apr 26)
  • Re: Port 25 - BlacklashDave Rand (Apr 26)
    • Re: Port 25 - BlacklashValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 26)
  • Re: Port 25 - BlacklashDave Rand (Apr 26)
• using TCP53 for DNSPatrick W. Gilmore (Apr 26)
  • Re: using TCP53 for DNSFlorian Weimer (Apr 26)
    • Re: using TCP53 for DNSChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 26)
      • Re: using TCP53 for DNSFlorian Weimer (Apr 26)
      • Re: using TCP53 for DNSChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 26)
      • Re: using TCP53 for DNSStephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 27)
    • Re: using TCP53 for DNSPatrick W. Gilmore (Apr 26)
      • Re: using TCP53 for DNSStephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 27)
  • Re: using TCP53 for DNSStephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 27)
  • Re: using TCP53 for DNSNils Ketelsen (Apr 28)
• Anyone from Verizon familiar with physical plant in PHLalex (Apr 26)
• Internet2Vicky Rode (Apr 26)
  • Re: Internet2Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 26)
    • Re: Internet2Scott Call (Apr 26)
    • Re: Internet2Vicky Rode (Apr 26)
      • Re: Internet2Daniel Roesen (Apr 26)
      • Re: Internet2Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 26)
      • Re: Internet2Vicky Rode (Apr 26)
      • Re: Internet2Randy Bush (Apr 26)
      • Re: Internet2Vicky Rode (Apr 26)
      • Re: Internet2Randy Bush (Apr 27)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Internet2Randy Bush (Apr 27)
      • Re: Internet2Dan Hollis (Apr 27)
      • Re: Internet2Florian Weimer (Apr 27)
      • Re: Internet2Vicky Rode (Apr 29)
      • Re: Internet2Mikael Abrahamsson (Apr 26)
      • Re: Internet2Adam McKenna (Apr 26)
      • Re: Internet2Douglas Dever (Apr 27)
  • Re: Internet2Jay Ford (Apr 26)
• Sheet could shelter Wi-Fi from eavesdroppersFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 26)
  • Re: Sheet could shelter Wi-Fi from eavesdroppersMartin Hepworth (Apr 27)
• NPR program: "The Internet as a public utility"Frank Coluccio (Apr 26)
• FCC Chief Wants 911 Service for Internet PhonesFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 26)
  • Re: FCC Chief Wants 911 Service for Internet PhonesPeter & Karin Dambier (Apr 27)
• Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 26)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 26)
    • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 26)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenSteve Sobol (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenSteven M. Bellovin (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenBill Stewart (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenSteve Sobol (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenSteven J. Sobol (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenMark Newton (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenSteve Sobol (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenSteven Champeon (Apr 29)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenSteven Champeon (Apr 29)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 29)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenSteven Champeon (Apr 29)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenNicholas Suan (Apr 30)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenAdi Linden (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenIljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenAdi Linden (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenIljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 28)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenJerry Pasker (Apr 26)
    • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenStephen J. Wilcox (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 27)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 26)
    • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenMark Newton (Apr 26)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 27)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenBill Stewart (Apr 27)
    • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenbmanning (Apr 26)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenDragos Ruiu (Apr 27)
      • claritybmanning (Apr 27)
      • Re: clarityOwen DeLong (Apr 27)
      • Re: claritywilliam(at)elan.net (Apr 27)
      • Re: clarityOwen DeLong (Apr 27)
      • Re: claritySteven Champeon (Apr 27)
      • Re: clarityOwen DeLong (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenwilliam(at)elan.net (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenElmar K. Bins (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenEdward Lewis (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 27)
    • Message not available
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenJay R. Ashworth (Apr 29)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenElmar K. Bins (Apr 27)
    • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenDavid Lesher (Apr 27)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenGreg Boehnlein (Apr 27)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenSteven M. Bellovin (Apr 27)
    • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenDaniel Senie (Apr 27)
    • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenDouglas Otis (Apr 27)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenW. Mark Herrick, Jr. (Apr 27)
  • Message not available
    • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 30)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 26)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 26)
    • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenMichael . Dillon (Apr 27)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenDan Hollis (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenDaniel Roesen (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenPetri Helenius (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenDan Hollis (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenIljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenDan Hollis (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenAdi Linden (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenPetri Helenius (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenBarry Shein (Apr 29)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenJames Baldwin (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenAdi Linden (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenIljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenAdi Linden (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenJohn Dupuy (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenwilliam(at)elan.net (Apr 28)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenJames Baldwin (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenJames Baldwin (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenAndy Johnson (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 28)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 28)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenJay R. Ashworth (Apr 30)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenRobert M. Enger (Apr 30)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 30)
    • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenGreg Boehnlein (Apr 27)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 27)
    • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenPetri Helenius (Apr 27)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenwilliam(at)elan.net (Apr 27)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 26)
    • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenMark Newton (Apr 26)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenJoe Shen (Apr 26)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 27)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 27)
    • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 27)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 27)
    • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenSam Hayes Merritt, III (Apr 27)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenGreg Boehnlein (Apr 27)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 27)
    • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenPetri Helenius (Apr 27)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 27)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 27)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 27)
  • RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOlsen, Jason (Apr 28)
    • RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenOwen DeLong (Apr 28)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenDave Rand (Apr 29)
    • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenSteven J. Sobol (Apr 29)
  • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenDave Rand (Apr 29)
  • RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenMiller, Mark (Apr 29)
    • RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenSteven J. Sobol (Apr 29)
      • Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenMark Andrews (Apr 29)
  • RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenMiller, Mark (Apr 29)
  • RE: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burdenDave Rand (Apr 29)
• Detecting VoIP traffic in ISP networkJoe Shen (Apr 27)
  • Re: Detecting VoIP traffic in ISP networkSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 27)
    • Re: Detecting VoIP traffic in ISP networkPetri Helenius (Apr 27)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Detecting VoIP traffic in ISP networkFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 27)
  • Re: Detecting VoIP traffic in ISP networkJoe Shen (Apr 27)
• Re: clarityJohn Clarke (Apr 27)
• bearing burdensbmanning (Apr 27)
• PAIX OutagesJay Patel (Apr 27)
  • Re: PAIX OutagesRandy Bush (Apr 27)
  • Re: PAIX OutagesRichard A Steenbergen (Apr 28)
    • Re: PAIX OutagesLeo Bicknell (Apr 28)
      • Re: PAIX OutagesRichard A Steenbergen (Apr 28)
      • Re: PAIX OutagesAlexander Koch (Apr 28)
      • RE: PAIX OutagesNeil J. McRae (Apr 29)
      • Re: PAIX OutagesAlexander Koch (Apr 29)
      • Re: PAIX OutagesDaniel Roesen (Apr 29)
      • RE: PAIX OutagesNeil J. McRae (Apr 29)
      • Re: PAIX OutagesStephen J. Wilcox (Apr 29)
    • Re: PAIX OutagesMajdi S. Abbas (Apr 28)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: PAIX OutagesHuopio Kauto (Apr 28)
  • Re: PAIX OutagesBrandon Butterworth (Apr 29)
    • Re: PAIX OutagesAlexander Koch (Apr 29)
  • Re: PAIX OutagesBrandon Butterworth (Apr 29)
• Another panix.com scenario? Hushmail this timeSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 27)
  • Re: Another panix.com scenario? Hushmail this timeAdam Jacob Muller (Apr 27)
• cox communications contact please?Jonathan M. Slivko (Apr 27)
• BT to offer six classes of serviceFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 28)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: BT to offer six classes of serviceFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 28)
  • Re: BT to offer six classes of servicechristian . macnevin (Apr 29)
• FCC To Require 911 for VoIPFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 28)
  • Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIPOwen DeLong (Apr 28)
    • Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIPIljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 28)
      • Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIPOwen DeLong (Apr 28)
      • Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIPIljitsch van Beijnum (Apr 29)
      • Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIPPeter & Karin Dambier (Apr 29)
    • Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIPMichael . Dillon (Apr 29)
  • Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIPMark Owen (Apr 28)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIPFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 28)
  • Re: FCC To Require 911 for VoIPPeter & Karin Dambier (Apr 29)
    • RE: FCC To Require 911 for VoIPNeil J. McRae (Apr 29)
• Internet email performance studyRobert Beverly (Apr 28)
  • Re: Internet email performance studyaljuhani (Apr 28)
    • Re: Internet email performance studyRobert Beverly (Apr 28)
      • Re: Internet email performance studyaljuhani (Apr 28)
      • Re: Internet email performance studyCrist Clark (Apr 28)
      • Message not available
      • Re: Internet email performance studyCrist Clark (Apr 28)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: Internet email performance studyaljuhani (Apr 28)
• Federal Security Bureau asks for more authority to control InternetSean Donelan (Apr 28)
  • Re: Federal Security Bureau asks for more authority to control InternetDave Crocker (Apr 28)
  • Re: Federal Security Bureau asks for more authority to control InternetMichael . Dillon (Apr 29)
    • Re: Federal Security Bureau asks for more authority to control InternetSuresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 29)
    • Re: Federal Security Bureau asks for more authority to control Internetwilliam(at)elan.net (Apr 29)
    • Sinkhole ArchitectureHoward C. Berkowitz (Apr 29)
      • Re: Sinkhole ArchitectureChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 29)
      • Re: Sinkhole ArchitectureHoward C. Berkowitz (Apr 29)
      • Re: Sinkhole ArchitectureChristopher L. Morrow (Apr 29)
• OT: calling Apple (apple.com)Paul G (Apr 28)
• ICANN needs you!Rodney Joffe (Apr 29)
  • Re: ICANN needs you!Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Apr 29)
    • Re: ICANN needs you!John Palmer (NANOG Acct) (Apr 29)
• NANOG going to be available over IPv6 ?Jeroen Massar (Apr 29)
• Internet impact of Apple TigerIrwin Lazar (Apr 29)
  • Re: Internet impact of Apple TigerMartin Hepworth (Apr 29)
    • Re: Internet impact of Apple TigerIrwin Lazar (Apr 29)
  • Re: Internet impact of Apple TigerMichael . Dillon (Apr 29)
  • Re: Internet impact of Apple TigerFlorian Weimer (Apr 29)
    • Re: Internet impact of Apple TigerValdis . Kletnieks (Apr 29)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Internet impact of Apple TigerMark Segal (Apr 29)
• Level3 Blip?Eric Whitehill (Apr 29)
  • Re: Level3 Blip?Marshall Eubanks (Apr 29)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Level3 Blip?Chris Ranch (Apr 29)
    • RE: Level3 Blip?Jon Lewis (Apr 29)
      • Re: Level3 Blip?Tom Sands (Apr 29)
  • RE: Level3 Blip?Jason L. Schwab (Apr 29)
• [no subject]Steve Sobol (Apr 29)
• Business Inaction Could Lead to Cybersecurity LawFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 29)
• OC3 to Gig-E conversionPeering (Apr 29)
  • Re: OC3 to Gig-E conversionRichard A Steenbergen (Apr 29)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OC3 to Gig-E conversionMiquel van Smoorenburg (Apr 29)
    • Re: OC3 to Gig-E conversionRichard A Steenbergen (Apr 29)
• Hushmail DNS Attack Blamed on Network SolutionsFergie (Paul Ferguson) (Apr 29)
• watchdog of BIND serverJoe Shen (Apr 30)
  • Re: watchdog of BIND serverJoe Abley (Apr 30)

Previous period

Next period