Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


SCP Foundation

Secure, Contain, Protect

SCP-292 / Discussion
Started by:Wikidot
Date:19 Aug 2009 19:44
Number of posts: 39
rss iconRSS:New posts
This is the discussion related to the wiki pageSCP-292.
page 1 of 3123next »
MrUnimportMrUnimport19 Aug 2009 19:59

Reminiscent ofSCP-688, our other time-rewindy button. Mixed as opinions of 688 may be, I believe it is slightly more coherent in purpose.

Unfold byMrUnimportMrUnimport,19 Aug 2009 19:59
Re:
QuikngruvnQuikngruvn19 Aug 2009 21:10

Wow, 688 has a helluva discussion page. How'd I miss that before?

UnfoldRe: byQuikngruvnQuikngruvn,19 Aug 2009 21:10
Re:
AdminBrightAdminBright20 Aug 2009 07:22

But this does it better then 688


Admin, SCP Wiki

UnfoldRe: byAdminBrightAdminBright,20 Aug 2009 07:22
Re:
LegendaryLegendary21 Aug 2009 05:37

They seem different enough. SCP-688 is for an unknown purpose and has an unknown amount of power. It is currently Euclid because it seems unlikely to destroy the world on its own. This one just seems to represent time. It only flows one way, and making it flow the other just rewinds time to before it was flipped.

Plus, this is a controlled effect. Keep it with you. If something goes wrong in a split-second, rewind time to fix. This much more horrifying in useable power, as it is unlikely to kill you.

UnfoldRe: byLegendaryLegendary,21 Aug 2009 05:37
Re:
QuikngruvnQuikngruvn21 Aug 2009 12:34

Thanks, y'all. That is one big difference with 688, in that youcould (easily) use 292 for personal gain. But, you can't just have something go wrong and then flip it. 292 doesn't start recording till it's flipped, then you've got 60 seconds to rewind before the sand runs out. It'd be better used just before a short, high-risk activity, then if it fails, flip back over and rewind. Also, potentially, precognition, though only for a minute ahead, and through the déjà vu filter. Plus side effects.

UnfoldRe: byQuikngruvnQuikngruvn,21 Aug 2009 12:34
QuikngruvnQuikngruvn16 Nov 2009 01:22

Please pardon my self-satisfaction that 292 survived the Mass Edit while 688 did not. I'll try to keep the smug down to a dull roar.

Unfold byQuikngruvnQuikngruvn,16 Nov 2009 01:22
recon_etcrecon_etc22 Aug 2009 03:06

One of the things I like about this one is that barring some sort of fixed-in-the-time-stream-relative-to-something-not-affected-by-this object, it seem impossible to figure out what exactly happened while the timer was flipped. For all we know, flipping the timer summons a shiny black demon that incinerates all in the immediate area, feels guilty, and rewinds time by itself, or dropping it summons the Interactive Fiction genie ala the 'do not break' glass cube.

Or maybe I'm just rambling because I haven't slept. Regardless, even though rewinding time is a little cliche, I still like how it's set out and think the experiments with it still show promise.

Unfold byrecon_etcrecon_etc,22 Aug 2009 03:06
Re:
QuikngruvnQuikngruvn22 Aug 2009 15:13

Thanks. And no, that did make sense, except that we do know what happens when it's flipped and allowed to run out. But we have no clue how it rewinds time. Heck, we have no way to observe 292 while it's rewinding. A lot of what is "known" about 292 is speculated or, at best, inferred.

UnfoldRe: byQuikngruvnQuikngruvn,22 Aug 2009 15:13
DocPyroDocPyro22 Feb 2010 04:03

While "audial" is a legitimate word, "aural" and "auditory" both seem to be more common: Google gets about 70,000 hits for audial vs. over 9,000,000 for auditory. More to the point, it turns up less than 100 hits for "audial hallucination" vs 70,000+ for "auditory hallucination". Is there some reason for preferring the less common term?

Unfold byDocPyroDocPyro,22 Feb 2010 04:03
QuikngruvnQuikngruvn22 Feb 2010 04:29

Yes: symmetry between "visual" and "audial". If I weren't concerned about aesthetics, I'd be right with y'all about "auditory", but… sorry, guys, I have to indulge my right-brain here.

Unfold byQuikngruvnQuikngruvn,22 Feb 2010 04:29
Malice McCreaMalice McCrea22 Apr 2010 09:23

Any thoughts on using this thing to auto correct failed attempts to kill 682? Those *usually* go horribly awry within 60 seconds, right? We could use this to keep from teaching 682 new tricks.

… Or that could backfire horribly, and we could give 682 the power to rewind time. Never mind.

Unfold byMalice McCreaMalice McCrea,22 Apr 2010 09:23
IcalasariIcalasari08 Jul 2010 07:09

I have seen it said many times, so I will just say it:

682 does not absorb powers. 682 merely adapts ways to protect itself from the effects of an attack on it

Unfold byIcalasariIcalasari,08 Jul 2010 07:09
Sonata GreenSonata Green20 May 2013 17:18

On the other hand, 682 is sapient, and therefore just as capable of harnessing 292 as we are.

Unfold bySonata GreenSonata Green,20 May 2013 17:18
minminminmin07 Oct 2011 07:42

My god, this is actually quite good.

Unfold byminminminmin,07 Oct 2011 07:42
LoccloLocclo08 Dec 2011 08:13

I love this article. The fact that it has self-preservation gave it a real sense of eeriness.

Any of you long-time members care to give an explanation to us newbies as to what the old 688 was? Now it seems to be a camera that captures objects (I glanced over the linked page and was totally confused as to how it reversed time in any way).

Unfold byLoccloLocclo,08 Dec 2011 08:13
AdminBrightAdminBright08 Dec 2011 08:25

It was a box that prevented anything bad from happening to it.


Admin, SCP Wiki

Unfold byAdminBrightAdminBright,08 Dec 2011 08:25
CurdledBoyCurdledBoy16 Mar 2012 10:47

I really quite like this one; simple concept nicely executed. Makes my head ache just considering it.
Good work, quik!

Last edited on17 Mar 2012 19:17byCurdledBoy Show more
Unfold byCurdledBoyCurdledBoy,16 Mar 2012 10:47
(account deleted)17 May 2012 18:44

I like this one, but the idea of an hourglass that gives you somewhat of a control on time feels cliché.

Unfold by(account deleted),17 May 2012 18:44
RJB_RRJB_R03 Jul 2013 06:17

Hrrm. I like the presentation of the initial effect, but the expungement of the juicier bits led me to downvote this. I mean, there's a cool premise set up, it goes along fine, but every time it seems like we're getting close to jumping off the rails into upvote territory, I hit an expungement and lose interest. Also, this should be safe. If we don't mess with it, nothing happens.


Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you!

Unfold byRJB_RRJB_R,03 Jul 2013 06:17
LukeDude759LukeDude75917 Jul 2013 04:24

True, a safe object really isn't dangerous unless you screw around with it, but Euclid means unpredictable. For all we know, this thing could try to take over people's memories or even alter the past.

Unfold byLukeDude759LukeDude759,17 Jul 2013 04:24
ObserverSeptemberObserverSeptember07 Sep 2013 15:53

Boring magic item, just well written enough to get a neutral vote.

Unfold byObserverSeptemberObserverSeptember,07 Sep 2013 15:53
page 1 of 3123next »
/forum/t-177121/scp-292#post-
Powered byWikidot.com
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed underCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License
Click here to edit contents of this page.
Click here to toggle editing of individual sections of the page (if possible). Watch headings for an "edit" link when available.
Append content without editing the whole page source.
Check out how this page has evolved in the past.
If you want to discuss contents of this page - this is the easiest way to do it.
View and manage file attachments for this page.
A few useful tools to manage this Site.
See pages that link to and include this page.
Change the name (also URL address, possibly the category) of the page.
View wiki source for this page without editing.
View/set parent page (used for creating breadcrumbs and structured layout).
Notify administrators if there is objectionable content in this page.
Something does not work as expected? Find out what you can do.
General Wikidot.com documentation and help section.
Wikidot.com Terms of Service - what you can, what you should not etc.
Wikidot.com Privacy Policy.

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp