Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

PROPOSED STANDARD
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                   R. RavindranathRequest for Comments: 8124                                  G. SalgueiroCategory: Standards Track                                          CiscoISSN: 2070-1721                                               March 2017The Session Description Protocol (SDP)WebSocket Connection URI AttributeAbstract   The WebSocket protocol enables bidirectional real-time communication   between clients and servers in web-based applications.  This document   specifies extensions to Session Description Protocol (SDP) for   application protocols using WebSocket as a transport.Status of This Memo   This is an Internet Standards Track document.   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has   received public review and has been approved for publication by the   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on   Internet Standards is available inSection 2 of RFC 7841.   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained athttp://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8124.Copyright Notice   Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the   document authors.  All rights reserved.   This document is subject toBCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of   publication of this document.  Please review these documents   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as   described in the Simplified BSD License.Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                    [Page 1]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 2017Table of Contents1. Introduction ....................................................22. Terminology .....................................................33. SDP Considerations ..............................................33.1. General ....................................................33.2. "websocket-uri" SDP Attribute ..............................43.3. "websocket-uri" Multiplexing Considerations ................44. SDP Offer/Answer Procedures .....................................54.1. General ....................................................54.2. Generating the Initial Offer ...............................54.3. Generating the Answer ......................................64.4. Offerer Processing of the Answer ...........................74.5. Modifying the Session ......................................74.6. Offerless INVITE Scenarios .................................85. Procedures at WebSocket Client ..................................86. Security Considerations .........................................97. IANA Considerations .............................................97.1. Registration of the "websocket-uri" SDP Media Attribute ....98. References .....................................................108.1. Normative References ......................................108.2. Informative References ....................................10   Acknowledgements ..................................................12   Authors' Addresses ................................................121.  Introduction   The WebSocket protocol [RFC6455] enables bidirectional message   exchange between clients and servers on top of a persistent TCP   connection (optionally secured with Transport Layer Security (TLS)   [RFC5246]).  The initial protocol handshake makes use of Hypertext   Transfer Protocol (HTTP) [RFC7230] semantics, allowing the WebSocket   protocol to reuse existing HTTP infrastructure.   Modern web browsers include a WebSocket client stack compliant with   the WebSocket API [WS-API] as specified by the W3C.  It is expected   that other client applications (e.g., those running on personal   computers, mobile devices, etc.) will also make a WebSocket client   stack available.  Several specifications have been written that   define how different applications can use a WebSocket subprotocol as   a reliable transport mechanism.Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                    [Page 2]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 2017   For example, [RFC7118] defines a WebSocket subprotocol as a reliable   transport mechanism between Session Initiation Protocol   (SIP)[RFC3261] entities to enable use of SIP in web-oriented   deployments.  Additionally, [RFC7977] defines a new WebSocket   subprotocol as a reliable transport mechanism between Message Session   Relay Protocol (MSRP) clients and relays.  [RFC7395] defines a   WebSocket subprotocol for the Extensible Messaging and Presence   Protocol (XMPP).  Similarly, [BFCP-WEBSOCKET] defines a WebSocket   subprotocol as a reliable transport mechanism between Binary Floor   Control Protocol (BFCP) [BFCP] entities to enable usage of BFCP in   new scenarios.   When a WebSocket subprotocol is used as a transport mechanism between   a server and client, there needs to be a way to indicate the   connection URI from the server to the WebSocket client.  For   applications that use Session Description Protocol (SDP) [RFC4566] to   negotiate, the connection URI can be indicated by means of an SDP   attribute.  This specification defines new SDP attributes to indicate   the connection URI for the WebSocket client.  Applications that use   SDP for negotiation and WebSocket as a transport protocol can use   this specification to advertise the WebSocket client connection URI.2.  Terminology   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and   "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in   [RFC2119].3.  SDP Considerations3.1.  General   Applications that use the SDP Offer/Answer mechanism [RFC3264] for   negotiating media and also use WebSocket or secure WebSocket as a   transport protocol MAY indicate the connection URI for the WebSocket   client via a new SDP "a=" media-level attribute defined inSection 3.2.Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                    [Page 3]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 20173.2.  "websocket-uri" SDP Attribute   This section defines a new SDP media-level attribute, "websocket-   uri", which can appear in any of the media sections.   Example:      a=websocket-uri:wss://example.com/chat   Where "wss://example.com/chat" is the ws-URI defined inSection 3 of   [RFC6455].   When the "websocket-uri" attribute is present in the media section of   the SDP, the IP address in "c=" line SHALL be ignored and the full   URI SHALL be used instead to open the WebSocket connection.  The   clients MUST ensure that they use the URI to open the WebSocket   connection and ignore the IP address in the "c=" line and the port in   the "m=" line.3.3.  "websocket-uri" Multiplexing Considerations   Multiplexing characteristics of SDP attributes are described in   [SDP-MUX].  Various SDP attribute multiplexing categories are   introduced there.   o  The multiplexing category of the "a=websocket-uri" attribute is      CAUTION.   There are no multiplexing rules specified for the "websocket-uri" SDP   media-level attribute.  Additionally, the specification of   multiplexing rules for the "websocket-uri" attribute is outside the   scope of this document.   While it is technically possible to bundle WebSocket, there are a   variety of reasons that make it impractical; thus, it is considered   unlikely to be used in practice.  Therefore, the "websocket-uri" SDP   media-level attribute defined inSection 3.2 for using WebSocket as a   transport protocol is not likely to be used with SDP bundle and is   consequently categorized as CAUTION for multiplexing.   If future extensions define how to bundle WebSocket, then   multiplexing rules for the "a=websocket-uri" attribute need to be   defined as well, for instance, in an extension of this SDP based   WebSocket negotiation specification.Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                    [Page 4]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 20174.  SDP Offer/Answer Procedures4.1.  General   An endpoint (i.e., both the offerer and the answerer) that wishes to   negotiate WebSocket as transport protocol MUST indicate that it   wishes to use WebSocket or secure WebSocket in the "proto" field of   the "m=" line.  Furthermore, the server side, which could be either   the offerer or answerer, MUST add an "a=websocket-uri" attribute in   the media section whose value can be either "ws-URI" or "wss-URI", as   defined inSection 3 of [RFC6455], depending on whether it wishes to   use WebSocket or secure WebSocket.  This new attribute MUST follow   the syntax defined inSection 3.  The procedures in this section   apply to an "m=" line associated with any media stream that uses   WebSocket or secure WebSocket as transport.   Both offerer or answerer can initiate a WebSocket connection.  It is   expected that, based on the topology (for example, if the client is   behind NAT and server is on global IP address), the offerer and   answerer applications decide on who will initiate the WebSocket   connection and appropriately set the "setup" attribute in SDP   following the procedures of [RFC4145].4.2.  Generating the Initial Offer   In order to negotiate WebSocket as a transport, an SDP offerer MUST   indicate that it wishes to use it in the "proto" field of the "m="   line.  For example, to negotiate BFCP-over-WebSocket, the "proto"   value in the "m=" line is TCP/WSS/BFCP if WebSocket is over TLS;   else, it is TCP/WS/BFCP, as specified in [BFCP-WEBSOCKET].   The offerer SHOULD assign the SDP "setup" attribute with a value of   "active" (the offerer will be the initiator of the outgoing TCP   connection) or "passive" if the offerer wishes to be a receiver of an   incoming connection.  The offerer MUST NOT assign an SDP "setup"   attribute with a "holdconn" value.  The offerer MUST follow the   procedures described in [RFC4145]  while using the "setup" attribute.   If the "setup" attribute has a value of "passive", it MUST have a URI   in the "a=websocket-uri" attribute.Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                    [Page 5]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 2017   The following is an example of an "m=" line for a BFCP connection:   Offer (browser):   m=application 9 TCP/WSS/BFCP *   a=setup:active   a=connection:new   a=floorctrl:c-only   m=audio 55000 RTP/AVP 0   m=video 55002 RTP/AVP 31   In the above example, the client is intending to set up the TLS/TCP   connection; hence, the port is set to a value of 9, which is the   discard port.4.3.  Generating the Answer   If the answerer accepts the offered WebSocket transport connection,   in the associated SDP answer, the answerer MUST assign an SDP "setup"   attribute with a value of either "active" or "passive", according to   the procedures in [RFC4145].  The answerer MUST NOT assign an SDP   "setup" attribute with a value of "holdconn".   If the answerer assigns an SDP "setup" attribute with a value of   "active", the answerer MUST initiate the WebSocket connection   handshake by acting as client on the negotiated media stream, towards   the URI specified in the "a=websocket-uri" SDP attribute using the   procedures described inSection 4 of [RFC6455].   If the answerer assigns an SDP "setup" attribute with a value of   "passive", then it MUST have a value of "ws-URI" or "wss-URI", as   defined inSection 3 of [RFC6455] in an "a=websocket-uri" SDP   attribute, depending on whether the application uses WebSocket or   secure WebSocket.  This attribute MUST follow the syntax defined inSection 3.Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                    [Page 6]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 2017   The following example shows a case where the server responds with a   BFCP media stream over a WebSocket connection running TLS.  It shows   an answer "m=" line for the BFCP connection.  In this example, since   WebSocket is running over TLS, the server answers back with an   "a=websocket-uri" attribute in the media section of SDP having a   "wss-URI" connection URI:   Answer (server):   m=application 50000 TCP/WSS/BFCP *   a=setup:passive   a=connection:new   a=websocket-uri:wss://bfcp-ws.example.com?token=3170449312   a=floorctrl:s-only   a=confid:4321   a=userid:1234   a=floorid:1 m-stream:10   a=floorid:2 m-stream:11   m=audio 50002 RTP/AVP 0   a=label:10   m=video 50004 RTP/AVP 31   a=label:114.4.  Offerer Processing of the Answer   When the offerer receives an SDP answer, if the offerer ends up   initiating the TCP connection, then it MUST follow the procedures inSection 5.4.5.  Modifying the Session   Once an offer/answer exchange has been completed, either endpoint MAY   send a new offer in order to modify the session.  The endpoints can   reuse the existing WebSocket connection by adding an   "a=connection:existing" attribute in the media section of the SDP   following the rules mentioned in [RFC4145], if the "websocket-uri"   SDP value and the transport parameters indicated by each endpoint are   unchanged.  Otherwise, following the rules for the initial offer/   answer exchange, the endpoints can negotiate and create a new   WebSocket connection on top of TLS/TCP or TCP.Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                    [Page 7]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 20174.6.  Offerless INVITE Scenarios   In some scenarios, an endpoint (e.g., a browser) originating the call   (a User Agent Client or UAC) can send an offerless INVITE to the   server.  The server will generate an offer in response to the INVITE.   In such cases, the server MUST send an offer with the "setup"   attribute with a value of "passive" so as to accept incoming   connection and MUST include an "a=websocket-uri" attribute in the   media section whose value MUST be either "ws-URI" or "wss-URI",   depending on whether the server wishes to use WebSocket or secure   WebSocket.  The SDP offer sent by the server will look like the   example inSection 4.3.5.  Procedures at WebSocket Client   The WebSocket client MUST always initiate the outgoing TCP   connection; hence, the SDP "setup" attribute MUST always be "active"   for the WebSocket client in its SDP offer/answer.  In the example   below, the WebSocket client is the offerer; hence, it assigns a   "setup" attribute with a value of "active".   The WebSocket server is a server on the Internet; hence, it MUST   always assign an SDP "setup" attribute with a value of "passive".   This also avoids the need to use Interactive Connectivity   Establishment (ICE) between WebSocket client and WebSocket server, as   the connection model here would be a typical client-to-server web   connection.   Once the offer/answer is complete, the client MUST initiate the   WebSocket connection handshake by sending a GET message on the   negotiated media stream, towards the URI specified in an   "a=websocket-uri" attribute, as per the procedures described in   [RFC6455].  When no port is passed in the "a=websocket-uri"   attribute, the default port (80 or 443) is used depending on whether   the value was "ws-URI" or "wss-URI".Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                    [Page 8]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 20176.  Security Considerations   An attacker may attempt to add, modify, or remove an   "a=websocket-uri" attribute from a session description.  This could   result in an application behaving undesirably.  Consequently, it is   RECOMMENDED that integrity protection be applied to the SDP session   descriptions.  For session descriptions carried in SIP [RFC3261],   S/MIME is available to provide such end-to-end integrity protection.   As described inSection 10 of [RFC6455], application signalling   traffic being transported over WebSocket MUST support secure   WebSocket and SHOULD employ it when communicating with their peers.   The WebSocket clients have to initiate the TCP connection to the   WebSocket server identified by the Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN)   in an "a=websocket-uri" attribute.  Further, as with any other web   connection, the clients will verify the server's certificate.  The   WebSocket client MUST follow the procedures in [RFC7525] (including   host name verification as perSection 6.1 in [RFC7525]) while setting   up a TLS connection with a WebSocket server.7.  IANA Considerations7.1.  Registration of the "websocket-uri" SDP Media Attribute   This document defines a new SDP media-level attribute "websocket-uri"   inSection 3.2; IANA has registered the following SDP att-field under   the "Session Description Protocol (SDP) Parameters" registry as   follows:   +---------------------+---------------------------------------------+   | Attribute name:     | websocket-uri                               |   | Long-form attribute | WebSocket Connection URI                    |   | name:               |                                             |   | Type of attribute:  | media                                       |   | Mux category:       | CAUTION                                     |   | Charset Dependent:  | No                                          |   | Purpose:            | The "websocket-uri" attribute is intended   |   |                     | to be used as a connection URI for opening  |   |                     | the WebSocket connection.                   |   | Appropriate values: | A ws-URI  or wss-URI, as defined in Section |   |                     | 3 of [RFC6455]                              |   | Contact name:       | Gonzalo Salgueiro                           |   | Contact email:      | gsalguei@cisco.com                          |   | Reference:          |RFC 8124                                    |   +---------------------+---------------------------------------------+Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                    [Page 9]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 20178.  References8.1.  Normative References   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate              Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119,              DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.   [RFC4145]  Yon, D. and G. Camarillo, "TCP-Based Media Transport in              the Session Description Protocol (SDP)",RFC 4145,              DOI 10.17487/RFC4145, September 2005,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4145>.   [RFC6455]  Fette, I. and A. Melnikov, "The WebSocket Protocol",RFC 6455, DOI 10.17487/RFC6455, December 2011,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6455>.8.2.  Informative References   [BFCP]     Camarillo, G., Drage, K., Kristensen, T., Ott, J., and C.              Eckel, "The Binary Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)", Work in              Progress,draft-ietf-bfcpbis-rfc4582bis-16, November 2015.   [BFCP-WEBSOCKET]              Pascual, V., Roman, A., Cazeaux, S., Salgueiro, G., and R.              R, "The WebSocket Protocol as a Transport for the Binary              Floor Control Protocol (BFCP)", Work in Progress,draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-15, February 2017.   [RFC3261]  Rosenberg, J., Schulzrinne, H., Camarillo, G., Johnston,              A., Peterson, J., Sparks, R., Handley, M., and E.              Schooler, "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol",RFC 3261,              DOI 10.17487/RFC3261, June 2002,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3261>.   [RFC3264]  Rosenberg, J. and H. Schulzrinne, "An Offer/Answer Model              with Session Description Protocol (SDP)",RFC 3264,              DOI 10.17487/RFC3264, June 2002,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3264>.   [RFC4566]  Handley, M., Jacobson, V., and C. Perkins, "SDP: Session              Description Protocol",RFC 4566, DOI 10.17487/RFC4566,              July 2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4566>.Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                   [Page 10]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 2017   [RFC5246]  Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security              (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2",RFC 5246,              DOI 10.17487/RFC5246, August 2008,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5246>.   [RFC7118]  Baz Castillo, I., Millan Villegas, J., and V. Pascual,              "The WebSocket Protocol as a Transport for the Session              Initiation Protocol (SIP)",RFC 7118,              DOI 10.17487/RFC7118, January 2014,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7118>.   [RFC7230]  Fielding, R., Ed. and J. Reschke, Ed., "Hypertext Transfer              Protocol (HTTP/1.1): Message Syntax and Routing",RFC 7230, DOI 10.17487/RFC7230, June 2014,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7230>.   [RFC7395]  Stout, L., Ed., Moffitt, J., and E. Cestari, "An              Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP)              Subprotocol for WebSocket",RFC 7395,              DOI 10.17487/RFC7395, October 2014,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7395>.   [RFC7525]  Sheffer, Y., Holz, R., and P. Saint-Andre,              "Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer              Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security              (DTLS)",BCP 195,RFC 7525, DOI 10.17487/RFC7525, May              2015, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7525>.   [RFC7977]  Dunkley, P., Llewellyn, G., Pascual, V., Salgueiro, G.,              and R. Ravindranath, "The WebSocket Protocol as a              Transport for the Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP)",RFC 7977, DOI 10.17487/RFC7977, September 2016,              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7977>.   [SDP-MUX]  Nandakumar, S., "A Framework for SDP Attributes when              Multiplexing", Work in Progress,draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-16, December 2016.   [WS-API]   Hickson, I., Ed., "The WebSocket API", W3C              Candidate Recommendation, September 2012,              <https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-websockets-20120920/>.Ravindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                   [Page 11]

RFC 8124                 WebSocket SDP Attribute              March 2017Acknowledgements   Thanks to Christer Holmberg for raising the need for a BFCP-   independent SDP attribute for WebSocket Connection URI.   The authors wish to acknowledge Paul Kyzivat, Suhas Nandakumar,   Christer Holmberg, Charles Eckel, Dan Wing, Alissa Cooper, and Joel   Halpern for their invaluable suggestions and review comments.   Thanks to Mirja Kuehlewind, Alexey Melnikov, Ben Campbell, and   Kathleen Moriarty for their comments and feedback during IESG   reviews.Authors' Addresses   Ram Mohan Ravindranath   Cisco Systems, Inc.   Cessna Business Park,   Kadabeesanahalli Village, Varthur Hobli,   Sarjapur-Marathahalli Outer Ring Road   Bangalore, Karnataka  560103   India   Email: rmohanr@cisco.com   Gonzalo Salgueiro   Cisco Systems, Inc.   7200-12 Kit Creek Road   Research Triangle Park, NC  27709   United States of America   Email: gsalguei@cisco.comRavindranath & Salgueiro     Standards Track                   [Page 12]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp