Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

PROPOSED STANDARD
Network Working Group                                         J. DegenerRequest for Comments: 5173                                   P. GuentherUpdates:5229                                             Sendmail, Inc.Category: Standards Track                                     April 2008Sieve Email Filtering: Body ExtensionStatus of This Memo   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Abstract   This document defines a new command for the "Sieve" email filtering   language that tests for the occurrence of one or more strings in the   body of an email message.Degener & Guenther          Standards Track                     [Page 1]

RFC 5173         Sieve Email Filtering: Body Extension        April 20081.  Introduction   The "body" test checks for the occurrence of one or more strings in   the body of an email message.  Such a test was initially discussed   for the [SIEVE] base document, but was subsequently removed because   it was thought to be too costly to implement.   Nevertheless, several server vendors have implemented some form of   the "body" test.   This document reintroduces the "body" test as an extension, and   specifies its syntax and semantics.2.  Conventions Used in This Document   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this   document are to be interpreted as described in [KEYWORDS].   Conventions for notations are as in [SIEVE]Section 1.1, including   the use of the "Usage:" label for the definition of text and tagged   argument syntax.   The rules for interpreting the grammar are defined in [SIEVE] and   inherited by this specification.  In particular, readers of this   document are reminded that according to [SIEVE] Sections2.6.2 and   2.6.3, optional arguments such as COMPARATOR and MATCH-TYPE can   appear in any order.3.  Capability Identifier   The capability string associated with the extension defined in this   document is "body".4.  Test body   Usage: "body" [COMPARATOR] [MATCH-TYPE] [BODY-TRANSFORM]                <key-list: string-list>   The body test matches content in the body of an email message, that   is, anything following the first empty line after the header.  (The   empty line itself, if present, is not considered to be part of the   body.)   The COMPARATOR and MATCH-TYPE keyword parameters are defined in   [SIEVE].  As specified in Sections2.7.1 and2.7.3 of [SIEVE], the   default COMPARATOR is "i;ascii-casemap" and the default MATCH-TYPE is   ":is".Degener & Guenther          Standards Track                     [Page 2]

RFC 5173         Sieve Email Filtering: Body Extension        April 2008   The BODY-TRANSFORM is a keyword parameter that governs how a set of   strings to be matched against are extracted from the body of the   message.  If a message consists of a header only, not followed by an   empty line, then that set is empty and all "body" tests return false,   including those that test for an empty string.  (This is similar to   how the "header" test always fails when the named header fields   aren't present.)  Otherwise, the transform must be followed as   defined below inSection 5.   Note that the transformations defined here do *not* match against   each line of the message independently, so the strings will usually   contain CRLFs.  How these can be matched is governed by the   comparator and match-type.  For example, with the default comparator   of "i;ascii-casemap", they can be included literally in the key   strings, or be matched with the "*" or "?" wildcards of the :matches   match-type, or be skipped with :contains.5.  Body Transform   Prior to matching content in a message body, "transformations" can be   applied that filter and decode certain parts of the body.  These   transformations are selected by a "BODY-TRANSFORM" keyword parameter.   Usage: ":raw"        / ":content" <content-types: string-list>        / ":text"   The default transformation is :text.5.1.  Body Transform ":raw"   The ":raw" transform matches against the entire undecoded body of a   message as a single item.   If the specified body-transform is ":raw", the [MIME] structure of   the body is irrelevant.  The implementation MUST NOT remove any   transfer encoding from the message, MUST NOT refuse to filter   messages with syntactic errors (unless the environment it is part of   rejects them outright), and MUST treat multipart boundaries or the   MIME headers of enclosed body parts as part of the content being   matched against, instead of MIME structures to interpret.Degener & Guenther          Standards Track                     [Page 3]

RFC 5173         Sieve Email Filtering: Body Extension        April 2008   Example:        require "body";        # This will match a message containing the literal text        # "MAKE MONEY FAST" in body parts (ignoring any        # content-transfer-encodings) or MIME headers other than        # the outermostRFC 2822 header.        if body :raw :contains "MAKE MONEY FAST" {                discard;        }5.2.  Body Transform ":content"   If the body transform is ":content", the MIME parts that have the   specified content types are matched against independently.   If an individual content type begins or ends with a '/' (slash) or   contains multiple slashes, then it matches no content types.   Otherwise, if it contains a slash, then it specifies a full   <type>/<subtype> pair, and matches only that specific content type.   If it is the empty string, all MIME content types are matched.   Otherwise, it specifies a <type> only, and any subtype of that type   matches it.   The search for MIME parts matching the :content specification is   recursive and automatically descends into multipart and   message/rfc822 MIME parts.  All MIME parts with matching types are   searched for the key strings.  The test returns true if any   combination of a searched MIME part and key-list argument match.   If the :content specification matches a multipart MIME part, only the   prologue and epilogue sections of the part will be searched for the   key strings, treating the entire prologue and the entire epilogue as   separate strings; the contents of nested parts are only searched if   their respective types match the :content specification.   If the :content specification matches a message/rfc822 MIME part,   only the header of the nested message will be searched for the key   strings, treating the header as a single string; the contents of the   nested message body parts are only searched if their content type   matches the :content specification.   For other MIME types, the entire part will be searched as a single   string.Degener & Guenther          Standards Track                     [Page 4]

RFC 5173         Sieve Email Filtering: Body Extension        April 2008   (Matches against container types with an empty match string can be   useful as tests for the existence of such parts.)   Example:        From: Whomever        To: Someone        Date: Whenever        Subject: whatever        Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=outer     &  This is a multi-part message in MIME format.     &        --outer        Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=inner     &  This is a nested multi-part message in MIME format.     &        --inner        Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"     $  Hello     $        --inner        Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"     %  <html><body>Hello</body></html>     %        --inner--     &     &  This is the end of the inner MIME multipart.     &        --outer        Content-Type: message/rfc822     !  From: Someone Else     !  Subject: hello request     $  Please say Hello     $        --outer--     &     &  This is the end of the outer MIME multipart.Degener & Guenther          Standards Track                     [Page 5]

RFC 5173         Sieve Email Filtering: Body Extension        April 2008   In the above example, the '&', '$', '%', and '!' characters at the   start of a line are used to illustrate what portions of the example   message are used in tests:   - the lines starting with '&' are the ones that are tested when a     'body :content "multipart" :contains "MIME"' test is executed.   - the lines starting with '$' are the ones that are tested when a     'body :content "text/plain" :contains "Hello"' test is executed.   - the lines starting with '%' are the ones that are tested when a     'body :content "text/html" :contains "Hello"' test is executed.   - the lines starting with '$' or '%' are the ones that are tested     when a 'body :content "text" :contains "Hello"' test is executed.   - the lines starting with '!' are the ones that are tested when a     'body :content "message/rfc822" :contains "Hello"' test is     executed.   Comparisons are performed on octets.  Implementations decode the   content-transfer-encoding and convert text to [UTF-8] as input to the   comparator.  MIME parts that cannot be decoded and converted MAY be   treated as plain US-ASCII, omitted, or processed according to local   conventions.  A NUL octet (character zero) SHOULD NOT cause early   termination of the content being compared against.  Implementations   MUST support the "quoted-printable", "base64", "7bit", "8bit", and   "binary" content transfer encodings.  Implementations MUST be capable   of converting to UTF-8 the US-ASCII, ISO-8859-1, and the US-ASCII   subset of ISO-8859-* character sets.   Each matched part is matched against independently: search   expressions MUST NOT match across MIME part boundaries.  MIME headers   of the containing part MUST NOT be included in the data.Degener & Guenther          Standards Track                     [Page 6]

RFC 5173         Sieve Email Filtering: Body Extension        April 2008   Example:        require ["body", "fileinto"];        # Save any message with any text MIME part that contains the        # words "missile" or "coordinates" in the "secrets" folder.        if body :content "text" :contains ["missile", "coordinates"] {                fileinto "secrets";        }        # Save any message with an audio/mp3 MIME part in        # the "jukebox" folder.        if body :content "audio/mp3" :contains "" {                fileinto "jukebox";        }5.3.  Body Transform ":text"   The ":text" body transform matches against the results of an   implementation's best effort at extracting UTF-8 encoded text from a   message.   It is unspecified whether this transformation results in a single   string or multiple strings being matched against.  All the text   extracted from a given non-container MIME part MUST be in the same   string.   In simple implementations, :text MAY be treated the same as :content   "text".   Sophisticated implementations MAY strip mark-up from the text prior   to matching, and MAY convert media types other than text to text   prior to matching.   (For example, they may be able to convert proprietary text editor   formats to text or apply optical character recognition algorithms to   image data.)   Example:        require ["body", "fileinto"];        # Save messages mentioning the project schedule in the        # project/schedule folder.        if body :text :contains "project schedule" {                fileinto "project/schedule";        }Degener & Guenther          Standards Track                     [Page 7]

RFC 5173         Sieve Email Filtering: Body Extension        April 20086.  Interaction with Other Sieve Extensions   Any extension that extends the grammar for the COMPARATOR or MATCH-   TYPE nonterminals will also affect the implementation of "body".   Wildcard expressions used with "body" are exempt from the side   effects described in [VARIABLES].  That is, they MUST NOT set match   variables (${1}, ${2}...) to the input values corresponding to   wildcard sequences in the matched pattern.  However, if the extension   is present, variable references in the key strings or content type   strings are evaluated as described in this document.7.  IANA Considerations   The following template specifies the IANA registration of the Sieve   extension specified in this document:   To: iana@iana.org   Subject: Registration of new Sieve extension   Capability name: body   Description:     Provides a test for matching against the                    body of the message being processed   RFC number:RFC 5173   Contact Address: The Sieve discussion list                    <ietf-mta-filters@imc.org>8.  Security Considerations   The system MUST be sized and restricted in such a manner that even   malicious use of body matching does not deny service to other users   of the host system.   Filters relying on string matches in the raw body of an email message   may be more general than intended.  Text matches are no replacement   for a spam, virus, or other security related filtering system.9.  Acknowledgments   This document has been revised in part based on comments and   discussions that took place on and off the SIEVE mailing list.   Thanks to Cyrus Daboo, Ned Freed, Bob Johannessen, Simon Josefsson,   Mark E. Mallett, Chris Markle, Alexey Melnikov, Ken Murchison, Greg   Shapiro, Tim Showalter, Nigel Swinson, Dowson Tong, and Christian   Vogt for reviews and suggestions.Degener & Guenther          Standards Track                     [Page 8]

RFC 5173         Sieve Email Filtering: Body Extension        April 200810.  References10.1.  Normative References   [KEYWORDS]   Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate                Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997.   [MIME]       Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail                Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message                Bodies",RFC 2045, November 1996.   [SIEVE]      Guenther, P., Ed., and T. Showalter, Ed., "Sieve: An                Email Filtering Language",RFC 5228, January 2008.   [UTF-8]      Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO                10646", STD 63,RFC 3629, November 2003.10.2.  Informative References   [VARIABLES]  Homme, K., "Sieve Email Filtering: Variables Extension",RFC 5229, January 2008.Authors' Addresses   Jutta Degener   5245 College Ave, Suite #127   Oakland, CA 94618   EMail: jutta@pobox.com   Philip Guenther   Sendmail, Inc.   6425 Christie Ave, 4th Floor   Emeryville, CA 94608   EMail: guenther@sendmail.comDegener & Guenther          Standards Track                     [Page 9]

RFC 5173         Sieve Email Filtering: Body Extension        April 2008Full Copyright Statement   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2008).   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions   contained inBCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors   retain all their rights.   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND   THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS   OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF   THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Intellectual Property   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be   found inBCP 78 andBCP 79.   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository athttp://www.ietf.org/ipr.   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.Degener & Guenther          Standards Track                    [Page 10]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp