Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


[RFC Home] [TEXT|PDF|HTML] [Tracker] [IPR] [Info page]

INFORMATIONAL
Updated by:9519
Network Working Group                                       J. GalbraithRequest for Comments: 4716                              VanDyke SoftwareCategory: Informational                                        R. Thayer                                                          Canola & Jones                                                           November 2006The Secure Shell (SSH) Public Key File FormatStatus of This Memo   This memo provides information for the Internet community.  It does   not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of this   memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2006).Abstract   This document formally documents an existing public key file format   in use for exchanging public keys between different Secure Shell   (SSH) implementations.   In addition, this document defines a standard textual representation   for SSH public key fingerprints.Table of Contents1. Introduction ....................................................22. Conventions Used in This Document ...............................23. Key File Format .................................................23.1. Line Termination Characters ................................23.2. Begin and End Markers ......................................33.3. Key File Header ............................................33.3.1. Subject Header ......................................33.3.2. Comment Header ......................................43.3.3. Private Use Headers .................................43.4. Public Key File Body .......................................43.5. Differences withRFC 1421 PEM Formats ......................43.6. Examples ...................................................54. Public Key Fingerprints .........................................65. IANA Considerations .............................................66. Security Considerations .........................................77. References ......................................................87.1. Normative References .......................................87.2. Informative References .....................................8Galbraith & Thayer           Informational                      [Page 1]

RFC 4716               SSH Public Key File Format          November 20061.  Introduction   The SSH protocol supports the use of public/private key pairs in   order to perform authentication based on public key cryptography.   However, in order to use public key authentication in the SSH   protocol, public keys must first be exchanged between client and   server.   This document formally describes an existing public key file format   that can be used with any of the common existing file transfer   mechanisms in order to exchange public keys.   The SSH protocol also uses public/private key pairs to authenticate   the server.  In this scenario, it is important to verify that the   public key provided by the server is indeed the server's public key.   This document describes a mechanism for creating a short text string   that uniquely represents a particular public key, called   fingerprinting.2.  Conventions Used in This Document   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this   document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].3.  Key File Format   In order to implement public key authentication, SSH implementations   must share public key files between the client and the server in   order to interoperate.   A key file is a text file, containing a sequence of lines.  Each line   in the file MUST NOT be longer than 72 8-bit bytes excluding line   termination characters.3.1.  Line Termination Characters   Implementations SHOULD generate public key files using their system's   local text file representation.   In the event that public key files are not transferred as text files,   implementations SHOULD be prepared to read files using any of the   common line termination sequence, <CR>, <LF>, or <CR><LF>.Galbraith & Thayer           Informational                      [Page 2]

RFC 4716               SSH Public Key File Format          November 20063.2.  Begin and End Markers   The first line of a conforming key file MUST be a begin marker, which   is the literal text:   ---- BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY ----   The last line of a conforming key file MUST be an end marker, which   is the literal text:   ---- END SSH2 PUBLIC KEY ----3.3.  Key File Header   The key file header section consists of multipleRFC822-style header   fields.  Each field is a line of the following format:   Header-tag ':' ' ' Header-value   The Header-tag MUST NOT be more than 64 8-bit bytes and is case-   insensitive.  The Header-value MUST NOT be more than 1024 8-bit   bytes.  Each line in the header MUST NOT be more than 72 8-bit bytes.   A line is continued if the last character in the line is a '\'.  If   the last character of a line is a '\', then the logical contents of   the line are formed by removing the '\' and the line termination   characters, and appending the contents of the next line.   The Header-tag MUST be encoded in US-ASCII.  The Header-value MUST be   encoded in UTF-8 [RFC3629].   A line that is not a continuation line that has no ':' in it is the   first line of the base64-encoded body.  (SeeSection 3.4.)   The space of header-tags is managed as described inSection 5.   Compliant implementations MUST ignore headers with unrecognized   header-tags.  Implementations SHOULD preserve such unrecognized   headers when manipulating the key file.3.3.1.  Subject Header   This field is used to store the login-name that the key was generated   under.  For example:   Subject: userGalbraith & Thayer           Informational                      [Page 3]

RFC 4716               SSH Public Key File Format          November 20063.3.2.  Comment Header   The comment header contains a user-specified comment.  The comment   SHOULD be displayed when using the key.   It is suggested that this field default to user@hostname for the user   and machine used to generate the key.  For example:   Comment: user@example.com   Currently, common practice is to quote the Header-value of the   Comment by prefixing and suffixing it with '"' characters, and some   existing implementations fail if these quotation marks are omitted.   Compliant implementations MUST function correctly if the quotation   marks are omitted.   Implementations MAY include the quotation marks.  If the first and   last characters of the Header-value are matching quotation marks,   implementations SHOULD remove them before using the value.3.3.3.  Private Use Headers   Headers with header-tags beginning with "x-" are reserved for private   use.3.4.  Public Key File Body   The body of a public key file is the base64 encoded ([RFC2045])   public key data as specified by[RFC4253], Section 6.6:         string    certificate or public key format identifier         byte[n]   key/certificate data   As with all other lines, each line in the body MUST NOT be longer   than 72 8-bit bytes excluding line termination characters.3.5.  Differences withRFC 1421 PEM Formats   Implementers should take care to notice that while the format is   superficially similar to those specified by PEM [RFC1421] and OpenPGP   [RFC2440], it is not identical; most notably:   o  The other specifications use different BEGIN/END delimiters (five      dashes, no space rather than four dashes and a space).   o  There is no blank line before the start of the base64-encoded      contents.Galbraith & Thayer           Informational                      [Page 4]

RFC 4716               SSH Public Key File Format          November 2006   o  There is no Cyclic Redundancy Check (CRC) at the end of the      base64-encoded block.   o  Header continuation uses a backslash at the end of the continued      line rather than whitespace at the start of the next line.3.6.  Examples   The following are some examples of public key files that are   compliant (note that the examples all wrap before 72 bytes to meet   IETF document requirements; however, they are still compliant.)   ---- BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY ----   Comment: "1024-bit RSA, converted from OpenSSH by me@example.com"   x-command: /home/me/bin/lock-in-guest.sh   AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAABIwAAAIEA1on8gxCGJJWSRT4uOrR13mUaUk0hRf4RzxSZ1zRb   YYFw8pfGesIFoEuVth4HKyF8k1y4mRUnYHP1XNMNMJl1JcEArC2asV8sHf6zSPVffozZ   5TT4SfsUu/iKy9lUcCfXzwre4WWZSXXcPff+EHtWshahu3WzBdnGxm5Xoi89zcE=   ---- END SSH2 PUBLIC KEY ----   ---- BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY ----   Comment: This is my public key for use on \   servers which I don't like.   AAAAB3NzaC1kc3MAAACBAPY8ZOHY2yFSJA6XYC9HRwNHxaehvx5wOJ0rzZdzoSOXxbET   W6ToHv8D1UJ/z+zHo9Fiko5XybZnDIaBDHtblQ+Yp7StxyltHnXF1YLfKD1G4T6JYrdH   YI14Om1eg9e4NnCRleaqoZPF3UGfZia6bXrGTQf3gJq2e7Yisk/gF+1VAAAAFQDb8D5c   vwHWTZDPfX0D2s9Rd7NBvQAAAIEAlN92+Bb7D4KLYk3IwRbXblwXdkPggA4pfdtW9vGf   J0/RHd+NjB4eo1D+0dix6tXwYGN7PKS5R/FXPNwxHPapcj9uL1Jn2AWQ2dsknf+i/FAA   vioUPkmdMc0zuWoSOEsSNhVDtX3WdvVcGcBq9cetzrtOKWOocJmJ80qadxTRHtUAAACB   AN7CY+KKv1gHpRzFwdQm7HK9bb1LAo2KwaoXnadFgeptNBQeSXG1vO+JsvphVMBJc9HS   n24VYtYtsMu74qXviYjziVucWKjjKEb11juqnF0GDlB3VVmxHLmxnAz643WK42Z7dLM5   sY29ouezv4Xz2PuMch5VGPP+CDqzCM4loWgV   ---- END SSH2 PUBLIC KEY ----   ---- BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY ----   Comment: DSA Public Key for use with MyIsp   AAAAB3NzaC1kc3MAAACBAPY8ZOHY2yFSJA6XYC9HRwNHxaehvx5wOJ0rzZdzoSOXxbET   W6ToHv8D1UJ/z+zHo9Fiko5XybZnDIaBDHtblQ+Yp7StxyltHnXF1YLfKD1G4T6JYrdH   YI14Om1eg9e4NnCRleaqoZPF3UGfZia6bXrGTQf3gJq2e7Yisk/gF+1VAAAAFQDb8D5c   vwHWTZDPfX0D2s9Rd7NBvQAAAIEAlN92+Bb7D4KLYk3IwRbXblwXdkPggA4pfdtW9vGf   J0/RHd+NjB4eo1D+0dix6tXwYGN7PKS5R/FXPNwxHPapcj9uL1Jn2AWQ2dsknf+i/FAA   vioUPkmdMc0zuWoSOEsSNhVDtX3WdvVcGcBq9cetzrtOKWOocJmJ80qadxTRHtUAAACB   AN7CY+KKv1gHpRzFwdQm7HK9bb1LAo2KwaoXnadFgeptNBQeSXG1vO+JsvphVMBJc9HS   n24VYtYtsMu74qXviYjziVucWKjjKEb11juqnF0GDlB3VVmxHLmxnAz643WK42Z7dLM5   sY29ouezv4Xz2PuMch5VGPP+CDqzCM4loWgV   ---- END SSH2 PUBLIC KEY ----Galbraith & Thayer           Informational                      [Page 5]

RFC 4716               SSH Public Key File Format          November 2006   ---- BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY ----   Subject: me   Comment: 1024-bit rsa, created by me@example.com Mon Jan 15 \   08:31:24 2001   AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAABJQAAAIEAiPWx6WM4lhHNedGfBpPJNPpZ7yKu+dnn1SJejgt4   596k6YjzGGphH2TUxwKzxcKDKKezwkpfnxPkSMkuEspGRt/aZZ9wa++Oi7Qkr8prgHc4   soW6NUlfDzpvZK2H5E7eQaSeP3SAwGmQKUFHCddNaP0L+hM7zhFNzjFvpaMgJw0=   ---- END SSH2 PUBLIC KEY ----4.  Public Key Fingerprints   The security of the SSH protocols relies on the verification of   public host keys.  Since public keys tend to be very large, it is   difficult for a human to verify an entire host key.  Even with a   Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) in place, it is useful to have a   standard for exchanging short fingerprints of public keys.   This section formally describes the method of generating public key   fingerprints that is in common use in the SSH community.   The fingerprint of a public key consists of the output of the MD5   message-digest algorithm [RFC1321].  The input to the algorithm is   the public key data as specified by [RFC4253].  (This is the same   data that is base64 encoded to form the body of the public key file.)   The output of the algorithm is presented to the user as a sequence of   16 octets printed as hexadecimal with lowercase letters and separated   by colons.   For example: "c1:b1:30:29:d7:b8:de:6c:97:77:10:d7:46:41:63:87"5.  IANA ConsiderationsSection 3.3 defines a new namespace of "Header-tags".  These are   US-ASCII strings of maximum length 64 characters and are   case-insensitive.   IANA has created and maintains a registry of these header-tags.  The   registry maps each header-tag to a reference defining the header.   The initial contents of the registry are as follows:      subject defined inSection 3.3.1      comment defined inSection 3.3.2   Header-tags beginning with "x-" are reserved for private use, as   defined in [RFC2434].Galbraith & Thayer           Informational                      [Page 6]

RFC 4716               SSH Public Key File Format          November 2006   All other allocations are to be made by IETF consensus, as defined in   [RFC2434].6.  Security Considerations   The file format described by this document provides no mechanism to   verify the integrity or otherwise detect tampering with the data   stored in such files.  Given the potential of adversarial tampering   with this data, system-specific measures (e.g., Access Control Lists,   UNIX permissions, other Discretionary and/or Mandatory Access   Controls) SHOULD be used to protect these files.  Also, if the   contents of these files are transferred it SHOULD be done over a   trusted channel.   The header data allowed by this file format could contain an   unlimited range of information.  While in many environments the   information conveyed by this header data may be considered innocuous   public information, it may constitute a channel through which   information about a user, a key, or its use may be disclosed   intentionally or otherwise (e.g., "Comment: Mary E. Jones, 123 Main   St, Home Phone:...").  The presence and use of this header data   SHOULD be reviewed by sites that deploy this file format.   The public key fingerprint method presented here relies on the MD5   one-way hash function, which is known to have certain weaknesses   regarding its collision resistance; however, the particular use made   of MD5 here depends solely on its 2nd-preimage resistance, not on its   collision resistance.   MD5 is used here for historical reasons.Galbraith & Thayer           Informational                      [Page 7]

RFC 4716               SSH Public Key File Format          November 20067.  References7.1.  Normative References   [RFC1321]  Rivest, R., "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm",RFC 1321,              April 1992.   [RFC2045]  Freed, N. and N. Borenstein, "Multipurpose Internet Mail              Extensions (MIME) Part One: Format of Internet Message              Bodies",RFC 2045, November 1996.   [RFC2119]  Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate              Requirement Levels",BCP 14,RFC 2119, March 1997.   [RFC3629]  Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO              10646", STD 63,RFC 3629, November 2003.   [RFC4253]  Ylonen, T. and C. Lonvick, "The Secure Shell (SSH)              Transport Layer Protocol",RFC 4253, January 2006.   [RFC2434]  Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an              IANA Considerations Section in RFCs",BCP 26,RFC 2434,              October 1998.7.2.  Informative References   [RFC1421]  Linn, J., "Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic              Mail: Part I: Message Encryption and Authentication              Procedures",RFC 1421, February 1993.   [RFC2440]  Callas, J., Donnerhacke, L., Finney, H., and R. Thayer,              "OpenPGP Message Format",RFC 2440, November 1998.Galbraith & Thayer           Informational                      [Page 8]

RFC 4716               SSH Public Key File Format          November 2006Authors' Addresses   Joseph Galbraith   VanDyke Software   4848 Tramway Ridge Blvd   Suite 101   Albuquerque, NM  87111   US   Phone: +1 505 332 5700   EMail: galb@vandyke.com   Rodney Thayer   Canola & Jones   650 Castro Street Suite 120-205   Mountain View CA 94041   US   Phone: +1 650 704 8389   EMail: rodney@canola-jones.comGalbraith & Thayer           Informational                      [Page 9]

RFC 4716               SSH Public Key File Format          November 2006Full Copyright Statement   Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2006).   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions   contained inBCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors   retain all their rights.   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST,   AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES,   EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT   THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY   IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR   PURPOSE.Intellectual Property   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be   found inBCP 78 andBCP 79.   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository athttp://www.ietf.org/ipr.   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at   ietf-ipr@ietf.org.Acknowledgement   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the   Internet Society.Galbraith & Thayer           Informational                     [Page 10]

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp