Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Search RFCs

Advanced Search

RFC Editor

RFC Errata


Errata Search

 
Source of RFC 
Summary Table Full Records

Found 3 records.

Status:Verified (1)

RFC 3401, "Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part One: The Comprehensive DDDS", October 2002

Source of RFC: urn (app)

Errata ID:283
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Olaf M. Kolkman
Date Reported: 2005-12-29
Verifier Name: Alexey Melnikov
Date Verified: 2010-04-02

Section 5 says:

Part Three: The Domain Name System (DNS) Database" (RFC 3402) [1]

It should say:

Part Three: The Domain Name System (DNS) Database" (RFC 3403) [2]

Status:Held for Document Update (2)

RFC 3401, "Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part One: The Comprehensive DDDS", October 2002

Source of RFC: urn (app)

Errata ID:2642
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2010-11-22
Held for Document Update by: Peter Saint-Andre

Section 4, pg. 3 says:

[[  last bullet: ]]   o  "Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part Four: The Uniform      Resource Identifiers (URI) Resolution Application" (RFC 3404) [3].      This Application uses the DDDS to resolve any URI to a set of      endpoints or 'resolvers' that can give additional information      about the URI independent of its particular URI scheme.

It should say:

   o  "Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part Four: The Uniform      Resource Identifiers (URI) Resolution Application" (RFC 3404) [3].      This Application uses the DDDS to resolve any URI to a set of      endpoints or 'resolvers' that can give additional information      about the URI independent of its particular URI scheme.|     "Dynamic Delegation Discovery System (DDDS) Part Five: URI.ARPA|     Assignment Procedures" (RFC 3405) [4] contains supplementary|     specification for this application and the DNS database that it|     utilizes.

Notes:

Rationale:
Missing citiation for RFC 3405 [4]; since there's no other instance
of that citation in the entire RFC, without it, the presence of
entry [4] in the References would not conform to the RFC Style Guide.

Errata ID:2641
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial
Publication Format(s) : TEXT

Reported By: Alfred Hoenes
Date Reported: 2010-11-22
Held for Document Update by: Peter Saint-Andre

Section 2, 2nd para says:

|  This document along with RFC 3402, RFC 3403 and RFC 3404 obsoletes   RFC 2168 [8] and RFC 2915 [6], as well as updates RFC 2276 [5].  This   document will be updated and or obsoleted when changes are made to   the DDDS specifications.  Thus the reader is strongly encouraged to|  check the IETF RFC repository for any documents that obsoletes or|  updates this one.

It should say:

|  This document along with RFC 3402 [1], RFC 3403 [2], and RFC 3404 [3]   obsoletes RFC 2168 [8] and RFC 2915 [6], as well as updates RFC 2276   [5].  This document will be updated and or obsoleted when changes are   made to the DDDS specifications.  Thus the reader is strongly   encouraged to check the IETF RFC repository for any documents that|  update or obsolete this one.

Notes:

Rationale:
a) missing citations,
b) grammar,
c) changed order according to expected temporal order and likelyhood
and thus, to match the preceding sentence.

Report New Errata



IABIANAIETFIRTFISEISOCIETF Trust
ReportsPrivacy StatementSite MapContact Us

Advanced Search

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp