Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings
Permalink

Comparing changes

Choose two branches to see what’s changed or to start a new pull request. If you need to, you can also orlearn more about diff comparisons.

Open a pull request

Create a new pull request by comparing changes across two branches. If you need to, you can also.Learn more about diff comparisons here.
base repository:sveltejs/svelte
Failed to load repositories. Confirm that selected base ref is valid, then try again.
Loading
base:svelte@5.41.1
Choose a base ref
Loading
...
head repository:sveltejs/svelte
Failed to load repositories. Confirm that selected head ref is valid, then try again.
Loading
compare:svelte@5.41.2
Choose a head ref
Loading
  • 6commits
  • 62files changed
  • 6contributors

Commits on Oct 21, 2025

  1. fix: guard contents updated before the guard itself (#16930)

    Fixes#16850,fixes#16775,fixes#16795,fixes#16982#16631 introduced a bug that results in the effects within guards being evaluated before the guards themselves. This fix makes sure to iterate the block effects in the correct order (top down)---------Co-authored-by: Simon H <5968653+dummdidumm@users.noreply.github.com>Co-authored-by: Simon Holthausen <simon.holthausen@vercel.com>
    @hmnd@dummdidumm
    3 people authoredOct 21, 2025
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    f549478View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
  2. fix: don't preserve reactivity context across function boundaries (#1…

    …7002)Fixes#16809We gotta take into account function boundaries when determining whether or not we're inside a derived (or const).
    @dummdidumm
    dummdidumm authoredOct 21, 2025
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    a57868eView commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

Commits on Oct 22, 2025

  1. chore(deps-dev): bump vite from 7.1.5 to 7.1.11 (#16989)

    Bumps [vite](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/tree/HEAD/packages/vite) from 7.1.5 to 7.1.11.- [Release notes](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/releases)- [Changelog](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/blob/main/packages/vite/CHANGELOG.md)- [Commits](https://github.com/vitejs/vite/commits/v7.1.11/packages/vite)---updated-dependencies:- dependency-name: vite  dependency-version: 7.1.11  dependency-type: direct:development...Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
    @dependabot
    dependabot[bot] authoredOct 22, 2025
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    5bb28c4View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
  2. fix: make$inspectlogs come from the callsite (#17001)

    * fix: make `$inspect` logs come from the callsite* default to showing stack trace* reuse id* DRY out, improve server-side inspect* update docs* ugh* fix the dang tests* ugh windows is there no punch bowl you won't poop in?* argh* how about this* alright finally
    @Rich-Harris
    Rich-Harris authoredOct 22, 2025
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    4b32d6dView commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
  3. fix: run batch until complete (#16971)

     at present we only call batch.increment() when something async happens if we're not inside a pending boundary, but that's incorrect — it means that a batch is committed before everything resolves. When work inside a pending boundary does resolve, the batch becomes a zombie.At the same time, we don't handle effects inside pending boundaries correctly. They should be deferred until the boundary (and all its parents) are ready.This PR attempts to fix that — during traversal, when we exit a pending boundary, any effects that were collected get deferred until the next flush. We also distinguish between batch.#pending (any ongoing async work) and batch.#blocking_pending (any async work that should prevent effects outside pending boundaries from being flushed).
    @Rich-Harris
    Rich-Harris authoredOct 22, 2025
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    7e40186View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
  4. Version Packages (#16992)

    Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
    @github-actions
    github-actions[bot] authoredOct 22, 2025
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    3009a02View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
Loading

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp