There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, butwe believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. | Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Spider-Man fallacy
Cogito ergo sum |
![]() |
Key articles |
General logic |
Bad logic |
TheSpider-Man fallacy is sometimes committed byBiblical literalists, and goes roughly like this:
- Literalist: '"Sodom and Gomorrah have been found byarchaeologists! This means theBible is true!"
- Non-literalist: "New York really exists, but that doesn't mean Spider-Man is real."
From this it can be inferred that, since knowledge is power, it comes with great responsibility.[1]
Origin[edit]
It was bitten by a radioacti... no hang on, um... It seems to have bubbled up through the lower depths of the netosphere in about 2007, being mentioned in a blog onMyspace.[2] However, it was on Myspace, so nobody read it. It turns up next in 2010 as an entry in Urban Dictionary[3] (a reliable source if ever there was one) and in 2012 was being discussed inChristian blogs. One article, hosted by theChristian Post,[4] attacks anatheist for using the argument by using such time-honoredapologeticnuggets asLuke was"a top notch historian",[5] that theNew Testament and Spider-Man"are of two different genres", and it trots out the usual suspects ofapologist scholars in support of these views. To no one's surprise, the article ends up with the equally tired claim that rejection of the New Testament is just based on an"anti-supernaturalist"bias.
References[edit]
- ↑Spider-Man.
Dir. Sam M. Raimi. Perf. Tobey Maguire, William Dafoe and Kristen Dunst. Columbia TriStar Home Entertainment, 2002. Film.Stan Lee. Unless it wasFDR. OrVoltaire. - ↑Potential Forum Discussion II: the Spiderman Fallacy
- ↑Urban Dictionary's Spiderman Fallacy entry
- ↑Jesus and the Spiderman Fallacy
- ↑Hear that sound? It's everynon-apologist scholar of ancient history spontaneously
RolfingROFL'ing.