Yale Papyrus Fragment from the Nag Hammadi Gnostic Library, Codex III, containingThe Dialogue of the Savior.

Light iron-age reading

Gabbin' with God

Old /New Testament Apocrypha Annotated Bible

Analysis

Pesher Bible translation Biblical contradictions

Woo

Name it and claim it Speaking in tongues Roman Piso

Figures

Paul of Tarsus Asherah Herod v -t -e

This page contains too many unsourced statements and needs to be improved. Nag Hammadi library could use some help. Please research the article's assertions. Whatever is credible should be sourced, and what is not should be removed.

TheNag Hammadi library (less accurately known as theGnostic Gospels^{[Note 1]}) are a collection of Coptic^{[Note 2]}Christian andphilosophical writings discovered in 1945 near Nag Hammadi,Egypt. The papyrus itself is generally dated to the 3^rd or 4^th century CE at the time of burial, though each individual codex has different dates of original composition.

The Christianity-based texts are mostlyGnostic in nature, and were likely buried at a time when theChurch (specifically Egyptian Bishop Athanasius) made his decree that non-canonical texts be outlawed. Of the religious writing, the single most critical find was a near-complete copy of theGospel of Thomas, a set of sayings attributed toJesus written near the beginning of the Christ-churches (non-Pauline churches) that arose in the 1^st century CE.

The texts also contain several non-Christian texts that would have informed Gnostic beliefs, includingPlato'sRepublic and theGreekHermetica. Despite the religious nature of the texts, they have become a source of much secularwoo and of conspiracy theories.

Importance[edit]

Besides the simple archaeological thrill of "oooh, something really old," the texts have a profound impact on historical understandings of various branches of Christianity that would be destroyed by the singularRoman Empire's version, theCatholic Church. The texts, along with the inclusion of the Greek works, show how important and fully-developed Gnostic ideas were in early Christianity. The texts show a developing scheme of "high philosophy" about the world around, emphasis on the individual, and a new tradition of questioning everything — something unacceptable to the Pauline tradition that depended upondogma and unquestioning acceptance of authoritative interpretations. A literal take of the texts suggests that Jesus himself was philosophically far closer to the Greeks and the developingJewish Gnosticism than to the Jewishauthoritarianism ofPaul.

The wonders of Barbelo[edit]

The lateChristopher Hitchens dedicates a segment of his bookGod Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything to exploring the fascinating implications of the Nag Hammadi texts, writing (in 2007):^[1]

Sixty years ago, at Nag Hammadi in Egypt, a trove of neglected "Gospels" was discovered near a very ancient Coptic Christian site. These scrolls were of the same period and provenance as many of the subsequentlycanonical and "authorized" Gospels, and have long gone under the collective name of "Gnostic." This was the title given them by a certainIrenaeus, an early church father who placed them under a ban asheretical.

They include the "Gospels" or narratives of marginal but significant figures in the accepted"New" Testament, such as "Doubting Thomas" andMary Magdalene. They now also include theGospel of Judas, known for centuries to have existed but now brought to light and published by theNational Geographic Society in the spring of 2006. The book is chieflyspiritualist drivel, as one might expect, but it offers a version of "events" that is fractionally more credible than the official account. For one thing, it maintains as do its partner texts that the supposedGod of the"Old" Testament is the one to be avoided, a ghastly emanation from sick minds. (This makes it easy to see why it was so firmly banned and denounced:Orthodox Christianity is nothing if it is not a vindication and completion of thatevil story.)

Judas attends the finalPassover meal, as usual, but departs from the customary script. WhenJesus appears to pity his other disciples for knowing so little about what is at stake, his rogue follower boldly says that he believes he knows what the difficulty is. "I know who you are and where you have come from," he tells the leader. "You are from the immortal realm of Barbelo." This "Barbelo" is not a God but aheavenly destination, amotherland beyond the stars. Jesuscomes from this celestial realm, but is not the son of any Mosaic God. Instead, he is an avatar ofSeth, the third and little-known son ofAdam. He is the one who willshow the Sethians the way home. Recognizing that Judas is at least a minor adept of thiscult, Jesus takes him to one side and awards him thespecial mission of helping him shed his fleshly form and thus return heavenward. He also promises toshow him the stars that will enable Judas to follow on.

Derangedscience fiction though this is, it makes infinitely more sense than the everlasting curse placed on Judas for doing what somebody had to do, in this otherwise pedantically arranged chronicle of a death foretold. It also makes infinitely more sense thanblaming the Jews for all eternity. For a long time, there was incandescent debate over which of the "Gospels" should be regarded as divinely inspired. Some argued for these and some for others, and many a life was horribly lost on the proposition. Nobody dared say that they were all man-inscribed long after the supposed drama was over, andthe "Revelation" of Saint John seems to have squeezed into the canon because ofits author's (rather ordinary) name.

But asJorge Luis Borges put it, had the AlexandrianGnostics won the day, some laterDante would have drawn us a hypnotically beautiful word-picture of the wonders of "Barbelo." This concept I might choose to call "the Borges shale":^{[Note 3]} the verve and imagination needed to visualize a cross-section of evolutionary branches and bushes, with the extraordinary but real possibility that a different stem or line (or tune or poem) had predominated in the labyrinth. Great ceilings and steeples and hymns, he might have added, would have consecrated it, and skilledtorturers would have worked for days on those who doubted the truth of Barbelo: beginning with the fingernails and working their way ingeniously toward the testicles, thevagina, theeyes, and the viscera. Non-belief in Barbelo would, correspondingly, have been anunfailing sign that one had no morals at all.

Reception by modern Christians[edit]

Few, if any, American Christians are even aware of the texts, or they confuse them with theDead Sea Scrolls.^{[Note 4]} However, an interesting turn in the world ofcreationists has now seen the Dead Sea and Nag Hammadi texts referenced as some kind of "proof" ofJesus, in response to skeptics' question "what evidence is there that isnot Biblical?".Yet at the same time, they will say they are not in any way the authentic words of Jesus. It must be nice to have your cake and eat it too.

Partial list of codices found at Nag Hammadi[edit]

Where on Earth is Nag Hammadi?

External links[edit]

• English translations of most of the texts

Notes[edit]

References[edit]

• Bible
• Apocrypha
• Bible analysis
• New Testament

• Pages using DynamicPageList parser function
• Articles with unsourced statements