2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, butwe believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today withPayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

Linus Pauling

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Linus Pauling in 1954.
Against allopathy
Icon alt med alt.svg
Clinically unproven
Woo-meisters
v -t -e

Linus Pauling (1901–1994) was anAmericanchemist famous for his work on quantumchemistry and the structures ofbiologicalmolecules, before his unfortunate late turn to thepseudoscience ofmegavitamin therapy.

Contents

Scientific work[edit]

The good[edit]

Pauling brought home with him the first-hand insights into the newquantum theory and X-ray crystallography fromEurope, and produced first-rate and seminal work on the quantum mechanics of chemical bonds, which is summarized in his bookThe Nature of the Chemical Bond.[1] This is considered the founding treatise of quantum chemistry. He also co-wrote an influential text titledIntroduction to Quantum Mechanics.[2] These texts remain valuable today.[3]

From the mid-1930s, Pauling shifted his attention to the study ofbiochemistry. He identified the difference between hemoglobin in normal individuals and in those suffering from sickle-cell anemia using X-ray crystallography. In the 1950s, he argued thatDNA had a triple helix structure as opposed to Watson andCrick's double-helix model, but then revised his position after he got access to Watson and Crick's higher quality X-ray diffraction photographs. Pauling came close to beating the duo in making the discovery.[3]

The bizarre[edit]

In a rather strange turn of events, Pauling in his later days became convinced thatmassive doses ofvitamin C could protect against not only the common cold but also various other illnesses. He was sufficiently convinced to even set up a research institute, theLinus Pauling Institute, promoting his non-mainstream line of research. Pauling had not conducted any of his own original research, and instead reviewed the scientific literature.[4]:80 This is not a bad thing in and of itself, but shortly after Pauling started promoting these ideas, he was censured by the very scientists that he was citing, who claimed that he misrepresented their work.[4]:80 This remains one of the most spectacular examples ofDunning-Kruger effect/Nobel disease. Pauling's unconventional medical views have never been accepted by mainstream scientists.[3]

As the 1950s developed, Pauling dedicated more and more of his time on thiscrankery and political activism, and did little further scientific research.[3]

Political activities[edit]

In the aftermath ofWorld War Two, Pauling and his wife becamepacifists, joining theEmergency Committee of Atomic Scientists. His political activism resulted in the State Department denying him a passport until Senator Wayne Morse denounced the action publicly.

As part of his anti-atomic activism Pauling signed theRussell–Einstein Manifesto and theMainau Declaration.

He was one of the leading advocates for a nuclear test ban treaty among the nuclear powers, the USA, the Soviet Union, and Great Britain. Such a treaty was entered into force on October 10, 1963. On the same day, the Norwegian Nobel Committee announced that Linus Pauling had won the Peace Prize that had been held over from 1962.[5]

All this meant that he was a perfect target forred baiting. He was ordered to appear before theSenate Internal Security Subcommittee where he was accused of being "the number one scientific name in virtually every major activity of theCommunist peace offensive in this country"[6]

TheNational Review accused Pauling of being afellow traveller of proponents ofSoviet-style communism. Pauling sued the magazine for $1 million but lost the case in court.[7][8]

Hisleft-wing sympathies and hisanti-nuclear activism did little to endear him with his colleagues. He was practically ostracized by the Chemistry Division of Caltech until 1991, when they threw him a party for his ninetieth birthday.[3]

See Also[edit]

External links[edit]

References[edit]

  1. The Nature of the Chemical Bond and the Structure of Molecules and Crystals. An Introduction to Modern Structural Chemistry by Linus Pauling (1939) Cornell University Press.
  2. An Introduction to Quantum Mechanics with Applications to Chemistry by Linus Pauling (1935) MacGraw-Hill.
  3. 3.03.13.23.33.4Gribbin, John, et al. “A-Z Dictionary.”Q Is for Quantum: an Encyclopedia of Particle Physics, The Free Press, 1998, pp. 275–276.
  4. 4.04.1Vitamania: Vitamins in American Culture by Rima D. Apple (1996) Rutgers University Press. ISBN 0813522781.
  5. [https://www.nobelpeaceprize.org/Prize-winners/Prizewinner-documentation/Linus-Carl-Pauling Linus Carl Pauling, Nobel Peace Prize 1962 (accessed June 12, 2021).
  6. The Science and Humanism of Linus Pauling (1901-1994) by Stephen F. Mason. Oregon State University (archived from May 15, 2009). Originally appearing inChemical Society Reviews (1997) 26:29-39.
  7. The National Review Lawsuit by scarc (January 30, 2013)The Pauling Blog.
  8. A Tough Conclusion to the National Review Suit by scarc (February 7, 2013)The Pauling Blog.
Retrieved from "https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Linus_Pauling&oldid=2716744"
Categories:
Hidden category: