2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, butwe believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today withPayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

Holmesian fallacy

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
John H. Watson and Sherlock Holmes from an 1893 illustration ofThe Greek Interpreter
Cogito ergo sum
Icon logic.svg
Key articles
General logic
Bad logic
v -t -e

AHolmesian fallacy (alsoSherlock Holmes fallacy orprocess of elimination fallacy) is alogical fallacy that occurs when some explanation is believed to be true on the basis that alternate explanations are impossible, yet not all alternate explanations have been ruled out.

The fallacy is anappeal to omniscience and aninformal fallacy.

Contents

In popular culture[edit]

The TV seriesHouse reprises the Holmesian structure but in a modern medical setting, replacing detectives with diagnosticians. The diagnosticians try to solve unlikely medical cases by whittling downjargon-laden possible diagnoses (the differential diagnosis) into an improbable last-minute treatment.

Alternate names[edit]

  • far-fetched hypothesis
  • arcane explanation

Explanation[edit]

The Holmes Method is illustrated by the quote from "The Adventure of the Blanched Soldier",[note 1] a 1926 Sherlock Holmes short story:

"When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." —Sherlock Holmes

To apply this method, one must find explanations and eliminate them one by one. However, to draw a logical conclusion from this is fallacious, because both steps require omniscience:

  1. Findevery possible explanation.
  2. Correctly disproveevery possible explanation, except the true and undisprovable one.

As should be obvious, this is incredibly difficult, requiresall knowledge of the situation, and may lead one to ridiculously improbable explanations.

In essence, a major flaw in this line of reasoning is that there may be explanations that you simply have not thought of.

Far-fetched hypothesis[edit]

It is typically offered byghost enthusiasts as an example of why one must not discount belief in thespirit world.[1][2][3]Star Trek's Spock even uttered a version of it inStar Trek VI — The Undiscovered Country.[4] It's no surprise thatparanormal claims of all kinds have adopted this fallacy. For example,crop circles:

Look at thatmutilated cow in the field, and see that flattened grass. Since the farmer is away and couldn't have done the deed,aliens must have landed in aflying saucer and savaged the cow to learn more about the beings on our planet.

Naturally, these are not the only explanations. Angry neighbors, rival farmers, pranksters, predators (not theSchwarzenegger movie kind), undetonated ordnance from a pastwar (if applicable), and many other perfectly mundane probabilities exist that must be eliminated. Even assuming they are, there are myriads of othersupernatural orparanormal phenomena that could potentially explain the death of the cow and the flattening of the grass that would similarly need to be falsified before the conclusion of "UFOs" or "aliens" can be accepted under this logic (For example, perhaps it was attacked by anaviancryptid. Perhaps it was struck down by [Insert Deity Here]. Perhaps it was possessed by ghosts ordemons, causing the cow to burst as they departed its body. Perhaps it is evidence of an airborne biological weapons test byMonsanto, designed to kill all cattle and force America to eatGMO-fed meat. And so on.Ad infinitum.).

According toAristotle inDe Anima, the philosopher Thales of Miletus once said (paraphrased):

The lodestone has asoul because it moves iron. This proves that all things are full ofgods.[5]

Thales failed to falsifyall alternate explanations because he didn't know thatmagnetism existed. Similarly, we may be disproven by future discoveries.

Lord Kelvin is almost infamous for these. Because he had no knowledge of nuclear fusion, isotopic decay, or nuclear fission, there was in his mind no way to reconcile the evidence that had been found bybiologists andgeologists that theEarth is at least hundreds of millions of years old with the seeming impossibility of theSun shining almost as bright as it does today for that period. As such, he believed the Sun was at most a few million years old and that either the biologists and geologists were wrong or the Earth far predated the Sun.

Unfalsifiable explanations[edit]

Most often, the Holmes method leads people to explanations that areeasy to find but difficult or impossible to falsify, such as agod of the gaps or othersupernatural entities with unknown properties. Often, people ignore the flaws in their preferred explanations.

Arthur Conan Doyle, who wrote the Sherlock Holmes stories, himself ended up believing inspiritualism andfairies by "using" the Holmes method.

Legitimate use[edit]

It is possible to grant provisional (scientific, not logical) assent to an explanation if it explains something better (ormore simply) than all known alternatives. This isn't anabsolute truth, merely the mostprobable one.

An alternate formulation, that is closer to what Holmes actually practiced, rather than preached, is that "when you have eliminated the common possibilities, one of what remains must be truth, no matter how improbable what remains may be".

Dirk Gently, in Douglas Adams'The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul, rejects the Holmes principle on the basis that "the impossible often has a kind of integrity to it which the merely improbable lacks." Often, impossible ideas merely suppose that there is something we don't know about, "and God knows there are enough of those". This ties in to the omniscience idea, that you should not assume that all possible explanations have been accounted for just because you personally can't think of any others.[6]

See also[edit]

External links[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. Similar quotes appear in Chapter 6 of the 1890 Sherlock Holmes novelThe Sign of the Four ("How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable. must be the truth?"), the 1892 Sherlock Holmes short story "The Adventure of the Beryl Coronet" ("It is an old maxim of mine that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."), and the 1902 Sherlock Holmes short story "The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans" ("We must fall back upon the old axiom that when all other contingencies fail, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.")

References[edit]

  1. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s Improbable Truth Ghost Box Communication
  2. Seeing ghosts Legendsofamerica.com
  3. Jackson Purchase Paranormal Investigations
  4. Starteck IV Spock Logic I YouTube
  5. http://www.iep.utm.edu/thales/
  6. Douglas Adams,The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul (1988) pgs 150-51 in the 2012 Pan Books edition
v -t -e
Articles aboutlogical fallacies
Informal fallacies: Appeal to tradition • Appeal to novelty • Appeal to nature • Argument from morality • Argumentum ad martyrdom • Big words • Certum est quia impossibile est • Morton's fork • Friend argument • Exception that proves the rule • Extended analogy • Hindsight bias • Race card • Moralistic fallacy • Release the data • Gish Gallop • Terrorism-baiting • Uncertainty tactic • Greece-baiting • Ham Hightail • Red-baiting • Gore's Law • Nazi analogies • Mistaking the map for the territory • Red herring • Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur • Presentism • Sunk cost • Two wrongs make a right • Flying carpet fallacy • My enemy's enemy • Appeal to ancient wisdom • Danth's Law • Argumentum ad lunam • Balance fallacy • Golden hammer • Loaded question • Escape to the future • Word magic • Spider-Man fallacy • Sanctioning the devil • Appeal to mystery • Informal fallacy • Common sense • Post-designation • Hyperbole • Relativist fallacy • Due diligence • Straw man • Good old days • Appeal to probability • Infinite regress • Circular reasoning • Media was wrong before • Is–ought problem • Ad iram • Just asking questions • Pink-baiting • Appeal to faith • Appeal to fear • Appeal to bias • Appeal to confidence • Appeal to consequences • Appeal to emotion • Appeal to flattery • Appeal to gravity • Appeal to hate • Argument from omniscience • Argument from silence • Argumentum ad baculum • Argumentum ad fastidium • Association fallacy • Broken window fallacy • Category mistake • Confounding factor • Counterfactual fallacy • Courtier's Reply • Damning with faint praise • Definitional fallacies • Equivocation • Fallacy of accent • Fallacy of accident • Fallacy of amphiboly • Gambler's fallacy • Imprecision fallacy • Moving the goalposts • Nirvana fallacy • Overprecision • Pathos gambit • Pragmatic fallacy • Quote mining • Argumentum ad sarcina inserta • Science doesn't know everything • Slothful induction • Spotlight fallacy • Style over substance • Toupee fallacy • Genuine but insignificant cause • Argument from incredulity • Appeal to age • Argumentum ad nauseam • Phantom distinction • Appeal to common sense • Argumentum ad hysteria • Omnipotence paradox • Argument from etymology • Appeal to trauma • Countless counterfeits fallacy •
 Ad hoc: No True Scotsman • Moving the goalposts • Escape hatch • Handwave • Special pleading • Slothful induction • Nirvana fallacy • God of the gaps • PIDOOMA • Ad hoc • Tone argument •
 Arguments from ignorance: Science doesn't know everything • Argument from incredulity • Argument from silence • Toupee fallacy • Appeal to censorship • Science was wrong before • Argument from omniscience • Willful ignorance • Argument from ignorance •
 Causation fallacies: Post hoc, ergo propter hoc • Correlation does not imply causation • Wrong direction • Counterfactual fallacy • Regression fallacy • Gambler's fallacy • Denying the antecedent • Genuine but insignificant cause •
 Circular reasoning: Infinite regress • Argument by assertion • Argumentum ad dictionarium • Appeal to faith • Circular reasoning • Self-refuting idea •
 Emotional appeals: Appeal to fear • Appeal to emotion • Appeal to confidence • Deepity • Argumentum ad baculum • Appeal to shame • Appeal to flattery • Tone argument • Appeal to money • Argumentum ad fastidium • Appeal to gravity • Appeal to consequences • Loaded language • Style over substance • Appeal to pity • Appeal to hate • Pathos gambit • Shaming • Degenerate • Abomination •
 Fallacies of ambiguity: Fallacy of accent • Equivocation • Fallacy of amphiboly • Quote mining • Fallacy of ambiguity • Moral equivalence • Scope fallacy • Suppressed correlative • Not as bad as • Etymology • Continuum fallacy • Wronger than wrong • Definitional fallacies • Code word • Phantom distinction •
Formal fallacies: Confusion of the inverse • Denying the antecedent • Non sequitur • Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise • Not even wrong • Chewbacca Defense • Affirming a disjunct • Illicit process • Four-term fallacy • Negative conclusion from affirmative premises • Fallacy fallacy • Substituting explanation for premise • Enthymeme • Syllogism • Formal fallacy • Existential assumption • Masked man fallacy • Self-refuting idea • Argument by gibberish • One single proof • Affirming the consequent • False dilemma • Conjunction fallacy •
Fallacious arguments: Bumblebee argument • Fatwa envy • Gotcha argument • Hoyle's fallacy • Intuition pump • Logic and Creation • Not Circular Reasoning • Peanut butter argument • Great Beethoven fallacy • Fallacy of unique founding conditions • Evil is the absence of God • Argument from first cause • How do you know? Were you there? • Argument from design • Argument from beauty • Appeal to nature • Solferino fallacy • Religious scientists • Nothing to hide • Argument from fine tuning • Creep shaming • "I used to be an atheist" • Atheism as a religion • Argumentum ad populum • Argument from morality • Anti-environmentalism • Appeal to bias • Apophasis • Argumentum ad nauseam • Appeal to censorship • Argumentum ad sarcina inserta • Blaming the victim • Bait-and-switch • Danth's Law • Chewbacca Defense • Canard • DARVO • Demonization • Escape hatch • Friend argument • Everyone is racist • Gish Gallop • Greece-baiting • Gore's Law • Ham Hightail • Just asking questions • Leading question • Loaded language • Linking to authority • Loaded question • Lying by omission • Motte and bailey • Nazi analogies • Moving the goalposts • One single proof • Pink-baiting • One-way hash argument • Pathos gambit • Quote mining • Poisoning the well • Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur • Race card • Red-baiting • Red herring • Release the data • Science was wrong before • Shill gambit • Straw man • Silent Majority • Uncertainty tactic • Style over substance • Terrorism-baiting • Weasel word • What's the harm (logical fallacy) • Whataboutism • Bullshit • Logical fallacy • Banana argument • Scapegoat • How come there are still monkeys? • Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white • Ontological argument • Omnipotence paradox • Presuppositionalism • Just a joke • Countless counterfeits fallacy •
Conditional fallacies: Slippery slope • What's the harm (logical fallacy) • Special pleading • Conditional fallacy • On the spot fallacy • Appeal to the minority • Argumentum ad populum • Galileo gambit • Professor of nothing •
 Genetic fallacies: Genetic fallacy •
  Appeals to authority: Ipse dixit • Appeal to confidence • Argumentum ad populum • Argument from authority • Linking to authority • Silent Majority • Invincible authority • Appeal to celebrity • Ultracrepidarianism • Appeal to the minority • Galileo gambit • Appeal to identity • Weasel word • Professor of nothing • Euthyphro dilemma • Divine command theory •
  Ad hominem: Ad iram • Argumentum ad cellarium • Bulverism • Poisoning the well • Blaming the victim • Tu quoque • Whataboutism • Nutpicking • Jonanism • Demonization • Shill gambit • Appeal to bias • Fallacy of opposition • Association fallacy • Damning with faint praise • Pathos gambit • Appeal to identity • Argumentum ad hominem • Nazi analogies • Not an argument • Nothing to hide • Scapegoat • 地下室论证 •
 Imprecision fallacies: Apex fallacy • Overprecision • Cherry picking • Overgeneralization • Texas sharpshooter fallacy • False analogy • Appeal to fiction • Spotlight fallacy • Pragmatic fallacy • Selection bias • Anecdotal evidence • Category mistake • Nutpicking • Imprecision fallacy • Confounding factor • Fallacy of accident • Neyman's bias •
Valid logical methods: Rapoport's Rules • Negative evidence • Reductio ad absurdum •
Fallacy collections: SeekFind • Nizkor Project • Fallacy Files • Your Logical Fallacy Is • Logically Fallacious •
Retrieved from "https://rationalwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Holmesian_fallacy&oldid=2715665"
Categories:
Hidden category: