There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, butwe believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. | Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Fallacy of accident
Cogito ergo sum |
![]() |
Key articles |
General logic |
Bad logic |
“”No rule is so general, which admits not some exception. |
—Robert Burton,The Anatomy of Melancholy |
Fallacy of accident is alogical fallacy that occurs when a general rule (a rule of thumb or a "soft" generalization) is taken to be universal (an unconditionally true statement).
The fallacy isjumping to conclusions and aninformal fallacy.
Alternate names[edit]
- a dicto simpliciter ad dictum secundum quid
- misuse of a principle
- ignoring qualifications
- sweeping generalization
Form[edit]
- P1:B typically impliesC.
- P2:A is an example ofB.
- C:A impliesC.
Examples[edit]
“”Water boils at a temperature of 212° Fahrenheit; therefore boiling water will be hot enough to cook an egg hard in five minutes: but if we argue thus at an altitude of 5,000 feet, we shall be disappointed; for the height, through the difference in the pressure of the air, qualifies the truth of our general principle. |
—H. W. B. Joseph |
- "Birds cannormally fly" is a general rule, and doesn't imply that all birds (such as emus or penguins) can fly. To take this general rule and apply it to all birds would be committing asweeping generalization.
Converse accident fallacy[edit]
Like many fallacies, simply flipping the logic used in the accident fallacy doesn't make it valid - you simply end up in another accident. The converse accident[1] fallacy is committed when the speaker suggests that an overwhelming exception should become the new normal. It is related to thehasty generalisation. For example, suggesting that because asthma sufferers use inhalers to help them recover from attacks, everyone should be prescribed one to improve their breathing. Here, asthma sufferers are the exception.
External links[edit]
- See theWikipedia article onSecundum quid.
- The Fallacy of Accident,Fallacy Files
- Accident, Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy