Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Atypon full text link Atypon
Full text links

Actions

Share

Comparative Study
.1998 May;170(5):1181-5.
doi: 10.2214/ajr.170.5.9574580.

Restenosis of peripheral stents and stent grafts as revealed by intravascular sonography: in vivo comparison with angiography

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Restenosis of peripheral stents and stent grafts as revealed by intravascular sonography: in vivo comparison with angiography

H Schwarzenberg et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol.1998 May.

Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to compare intravascular sonography with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the assessment of luminal dimension and morphologic features of endovascular stents and stent grafts.

Materials and methods: Thirty-seven pelvic and 24 femoral stents (12 Wall-stents; 27 covered and 22 uncovered nitinol stents) in 50 patients were evaluated 15 +/- 10 months after implantation by DSA and intravascular sonography. The degree of maximum instent restenosis as revealed by DSA and intravascular sonography was compared for each location. Morphologic features of the stents and stenoses were also assessed.

Results: Intravascular sonography and DSA correlated well (R2 = .96) in determining in-stent restenosis. In-stent restenosis was underestimated by 13% +/- 6% by DSA compared with intravascular sonography. Differences in determining in-stent restenosis with intravascular sonography and DSA were not associated with severity of stenosis or type of stent. Intravascular sonography revealed incomplete expansion of stents in 21 cases, whereas DSA revealed incomplete expansion of stents in seven cases. The intra- and interobserver variabilities in our study were 4% and 5%, respectively.

Conclusion: In-stent restenoses are underestimated with DSA. Intravascular sonography is superior to DSA for detection of incomplete stent expansion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

  • Endovascular stents for intermittent claudication.
    Bachoo P, Thorpe PA, Maxwell H, Welch K.Bachoo P, et al.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD003228. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003228.pub2.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010.PMID:20091540Free PMC article.Review.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Related information

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Atypon full text link Atypon
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp