Comparative Study
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-11-04302.1997.The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception
Affiliations
- PMID:9151747
- PMCID: PMC6573547
- DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-11-04302.1997
Item in Clipboard
Comparative Study
The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception
N Kanwisher et al. J Neurosci..
Display options
Format
Display options
Format
Abstract
Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we found an area in the fusiform gyrus in 12 of the 15 subjects tested that was significantly more active when the subjects viewed faces than when they viewed assorted common objects. This face activation was used to define a specific region of interest individually for each subject, within which several new tests of face specificity were run. In each of five subjects tested, the predefined candidate "face area" also responded significantly more strongly to passive viewing of (1) intact than scrambled two-tone faces, (2) full front-view face photos than front-view photos of houses, and (in a different set of five subjects) (3) three-quarter-view face photos (with hair concealed) than photos of human hands; it also responded more strongly during (4) a consecutive matching task performed on three-quarter-view faces versus hands. Our technique of running multiple tests applied to the same region defined functionally within individual subjects provides a solution to two common problems in functional imaging: (1) the requirement to correct for multiple statistical comparisons and (2) the inevitable ambiguity in the interpretation of any study in which only two or three conditions are compared. Our data allow us to reject alternative accounts of the function of the fusiform face area (area "FF") that appeal to visual attention, subordinate-level classification, or general processing of any animate or human forms, demonstrating that this region is selectively involved in the perception of faces.
Figures
Results of Part II.Left column, Sample stimuli used for the faces versus objects comparison as well as the two subsequent tests.Center column, Areas that produced significantly greater activation for faces than control stimuli for subject S1.a, The faces versus objects comparison was used to define a single ROI (shown ingreen outline for S1), separately for each subject. The time courses in theright column were produced by (1) averaging the percentage signal change across all voxels in a given subject’s ROI (using the original unsmoothed data), and then (2) averaging these ROI-averages across the five subjects.F andO ina indicate face and object epochs;I andS inb indicate intact and scrambled face epochs; andF andH inc indicate face and hand epochs.
Results from subject S1 on Part I. Theright hemisphere appears on theleft for these and all brain images in this paper (except the resliced images labeled “Axial” in Fig. 2). Thebrain images at theleft show incolor the voxels that produced a significantly higher MR signal intensity (based on smoothed data) during the epochs containing faces than during those containing objects (1a) and vice versa (1b) for 1 of the 12 slices scanned. These significance images (seecolor key atright for this and all figures in this paper) are overlaid on a T1-weighted anatomical image of the same slice. Most of the other 11 slices showed no voxels that reached significance at thep < 10−3 level or better in either direction of the comparison. In each image, an ROI is shown outlined ingreen, and the time course of raw percentage signal change over the 5 min 20 sec scan (based on unsmoothed data and averaged across the voxels in this ROI) is shown at theright. Epochs in which faces were presented are indicated by thevertical gray bars marked with anF;gray bars with anOindicate epochs during which assorted objects were presented;white bars indicate fixation epochs.
Midsagittal anatomical image from subject S1 showing the typical placing of the 12 slices used in this study. Slices were selected so as to include the entire ventral surface of the occipital and temporal lobes.
Similar articles
- Covert visual attention modulates face-specific activity in the human fusiform gyrus: fMRI study.Wojciulik E, Kanwisher N, Driver J.Wojciulik E, et al.J Neurophysiol. 1998 Mar;79(3):1574-8. doi: 10.1152/jn.1998.79.3.1574.J Neurophysiol. 1998.PMID:9497433
- Horizontal tuning for faces originates in high-level Fusiform Face Area.Goffaux V, Duecker F, Hausfeld L, Schiltz C, Goebel R.Goffaux V, et al.Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jan 29;81:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.12.004. Epub 2015 Dec 9.Neuropsychologia. 2016.PMID:26683383
- Portraits or people? Distinct representations of face identity in the human visual cortex.Pourtois G, Schwartz S, Seghier ML, Lazeyras F, Vuilleumier P.Pourtois G, et al.J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Jul;17(7):1043-57. doi: 10.1162/0898929054475181.J Cogn Neurosci. 2005.PMID:16102236
- Distributed and interactive brain mechanisms during emotion face perception: evidence from functional neuroimaging.Vuilleumier P, Pourtois G.Vuilleumier P, et al.Neuropsychologia. 2007 Jan 7;45(1):174-94. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.003. Epub 2006 Jul 18.Neuropsychologia. 2007.PMID:16854439Review.
- The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces.Kanwisher N, Yovel G.Kanwisher N, et al.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Dec 29;361(1476):2109-28. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1934.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006.PMID:17118927Free PMC article.Review.
Cited by
- Face shape processingvia visual-to-auditory sensory substitution activates regions within the face processing networks in the absence of visual experience.Arbel R, Heimler B, Amedi A.Arbel R, et al.Front Neurosci. 2022 Oct 3;16:921321. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.921321. eCollection 2022.Front Neurosci. 2022.PMID:36263367Free PMC article.
- Cortical thickness gradients in structural hierarchies.Wagstyl K, Ronan L, Goodyer IM, Fletcher PC.Wagstyl K, et al.Neuroimage. 2015 May 1;111:241-50. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.036. Epub 2015 Feb 25.Neuroimage. 2015.PMID:25725468Free PMC article.
- Is Anosognosia for Left-Sided Hemiplegia Due to a Specific Self-Awareness Defect or to a Poorly Conscious Working Mode Typical of the Right Hemisphere?Gainotti G.Gainotti G.Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Nov 23;13(12):964. doi: 10.3390/bs13120964.Behav Sci (Basel). 2023.PMID:38131820Free PMC article.Review.
- Cortical representation of animate and inanimate objects in complex natural scenes.Naselaris T, Stansbury DE, Gallant JL.Naselaris T, et al.J Physiol Paris. 2012 Sep-Dec;106(5-6):239-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Mar 28.J Physiol Paris. 2012.PMID:22472178Free PMC article.
- Auditory object salience: human cortical processing of non-biological action sounds and their acoustic signal attributes.Lewis JW, Talkington WJ, Tallaksen KC, Frum CA.Lewis JW, et al.Front Syst Neurosci. 2012 May 9;6:27. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2012.00027. eCollection 2012.Front Syst Neurosci. 2012.PMID:22582038Free PMC article.
References
- Allison T, Ginter H, McCarthy G, Nobre AC, Puce A, Belger A. Face recognition in human extrastriate cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1994;71:821–825. - PubMed
- Behrmann M, Winocur G, Moscovitch M. Dissociation between mental imagery and object recognition in a brain-damaged patient. Nature. 1992;359:636–637. - PubMed
- Breiter HC, Etcoff NL, Whalen PJ, Kennedy WA, Rauch SL, Buckner RL, Strauss MM, Hyman SE, Rosen BR. Response and habituation of the human amygdala during visual processing of facial expression. Neuron. 1996;17:875–887. - PubMed
- Bruce V, Doyle T, Dench N, Burton M. Remembering facial configurations. Cognition. 1991;38:109–144. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources