Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science
Full text links

Actions

.1997 Mar;111(3):661-4.
doi: 10.1378/chest.111.3.661.

The incidence of deep venous thrombosis in ICU patients

Affiliations

The incidence of deep venous thrombosis in ICU patients

P E Marik et al. Chest.1997 Mar.

Abstract

Study objective: To determine the incidence, clinical presentation, and risk factors of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in a high-risk group of ICU patients receiving DVT prophylaxis.

Design: A prospective cohort study.

Setting: Two ICUs of a university-affiliated teaching hospital.

Patients: Patients admitted to the ICUs within 48 h of hospitalization and who had an ICU stay of > or = 4 days underwent venous duplex scans.

Interventions: None.

Results: One hundred two patients were studied. Ninety-four (92%) patients received DVT prophylaxis. Twelve patients (12%) were documented to have DVT by venous duplex scans. There was proximal clot extension in eight of these patients, four of whom had high-probability ventilation/perfusion scans. Of the 56 patients without signs or symptoms of DVT, only two (3.6%) had abnormal scans. Leg swelling was present in 11 patients, six of whom had DVT (p = 0.004). One of 11 patients with unexplained fever had an abnormal scan. Five of the 26 patients (19%) receiving pneumatic compression developed DVT compared with five of 68 patients (7.4%) receiving subcutaneous heparin (not significant). No specific factor was identified that increased the risk of DVT.

Conclusion: In this study, the incidence of DVT in a group of high-risk ICU patients receiving DVT prophylaxis was 12%. Since scans in patients without signs or symptoms suggestive of DVT were abnormal in only 3.6% of patients, venous scans should be performed only in patients with features suggestive of DVT or pulmonary embolism.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp