Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Nature Publishing Group full text link Nature Publishing Group
Full text links

Actions

Clinical Trial
.1996 Apr;34(4):188-92.
doi: 10.1038/sc.1996.37.

Effect of surgery on motor recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effect of surgery on motor recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury

R L Waters et al. Spinal Cord.1996 Apr.

Abstract

The influence of spine surgery on motor recovery between 1 month and 1 year was assessed prospectively in a group of 269 patients following traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) using the classification system originally developed by the American Spinal Injury Association. The Allen classification was used to categorize cervical vertebral pathology and the Denis system was used for injuries to the thoracic and lumbar spine. Gunshot injuries were classified based upon the bullet trajectory and location relative to the spinal canal. Individuals undergoing surgery were divided into various subgroups depending on the type of surgery performed: anterior decompression with or without spine fusion and instrumentation, posterior decompression/laminectomy with or without spine fusion and instrumentation and spine fusion with instrumentation. Motor score recovery between 1 month and 1 year after injury was highly dependent (P < or = 0.001) on the level and completeness of injury averaging 0.7 +/- 2.7 for complete paraplegics, 7.8 +/- 4.8 for complete tetraplegics, 11.8 +/- 8.3, for incomplete paraplegics and 22.2 +/- 10.9 for incomplete tetraplegics. Motor recovery did not significantly differ between patients categorized in various surgical subgroups or between those having surgery and those treated non-operatively. Additionally, although the sample size was small, motor recovery among tetraplegic individuals did not depend on whether unilateral and bilateral facet dislocations were reduced and in patients with incomplete lesions, those with reductions actually had a poorer outcome than those who were left in a dislocated position.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Nature Publishing Group full text link Nature Publishing Group
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp