Adverse reactions to gadolinium contrast media: a review of 36 cases
- PMID:8819369
- DOI: 10.2214/ajr.167.4.8819369
Adverse reactions to gadolinium contrast media: a review of 36 cases
Abstract
Objective: We investigated the frequency, manifestations, and severity of reactions to gadolinium contrast media in patients who underwent MR imaging at a single institution.
Materials and methods: We reviewed the quality assurance records of 21,000 patients to whom gadolinium contrast media were administered at our institution between January 1990 and October 1994. Of these patients, 36 had adverse reactions. All 36 patients were evaluated by a radiologist at the time of the adverse reaction, and a written report of the findings was completed immediately.
Results: We classified adverse reactions into four groups: mild nonallergic reactions (15 patients with nausea or vomiting), mild reactions resembling allergy (12 patients with hives, diffuse erythema, or skin irritation), moderate reactions resembling allergy (seven patients with respiratory symptoms), and life-threatening reactions resembling allergy (two patients with severe chest tightness, respiratory distress, and periorbital edema). Eleven of these 36 patients who had adverse reactions also had an unusual local reaction of skin discomfort in the extremity through which gadolinium was injected. Four of the 36 patients with adverse reactions had histories of adverse reactions to iodinated contrast media. All four of these patients and one of the remaining 32 patients with adverse reactions required treatment. No patients with adverse reactions died.
Conclusion: Although gadolinium contrast media are safe, we found that patients had adverse reactions at a frequency greater than we expected. Severe anaphylactoid reactions occurred in two patients (0.01%). This rate exceeds the rate of 0.0003% reported in the literature. The indexes of suspicion for the occurrence of reactions to gadolinium, and both the documentation and the management of adverse reactions, must be as rigorous for reactions associated with MR imaging contrast agents as they are for reactions associated with iodinated contrast media.
Similar articles
- Occurrence of adverse reactions to gadolinium-based contrast material and management of patients at increased risk: a survey of the American Society of Neuroradiology Fellowship Directors.Murphy KP, Szopinski KT, Cohan RH, Mermillod B, Ellis JH.Murphy KP, et al.Acad Radiol. 1999 Nov;6(11):656-64. doi: 10.1016/S1076-6332(99)80114-7.Acad Radiol. 1999.PMID:10894068
- Acute adverse reactions to magnetic resonance contrast media--gadolinium chelates.Li A, Wong CS, Wong MK, Lee CM, Au Yeung MC.Li A, et al.Br J Radiol. 2006 May;79(941):368-71. doi: 10.1259/bjr/88469693.Br J Radiol. 2006.PMID:16632615
- Incidence of immediate gadolinium contrast media reactions.Prince MR, Zhang H, Zou Z, Staron RB, Brill PW.Prince MR, et al.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Feb;196(2):W138-43. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4885.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011.PMID:21257854
- Safety of magnetic resonance contrast media.Runge VM.Runge VM.Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Aug;12(4):309-14. doi: 10.1097/00002142-200108000-00007.Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2001.PMID:11687717Review.
- Acute adverse reactions to radiographic iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast media: incidence, risk factors and premedication: from published evidence to a practical approach.Tonolini M, Bianco R.Tonolini M, et al.Clin Ter. 2011;162(6):591-4.Clin Ter. 2011.PMID:22262334Review.
Cited by
- Deep learning segmentation of peri-sinus structures from structural magnetic resonance imaging: validation and normative ranges across the adult lifespan.Hett K, McKnight CD, Leguizamon M, Lindsey JS, Eisma JJ, Elenberger J, Stark AJ, Song AK, Aumann M, Considine CM, Claassen DO, Donahue MJ.Hett K, et al.Fluids Barriers CNS. 2024 Feb 13;21(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12987-024-00516-w.Fluids Barriers CNS. 2024.PMID:38350930Free PMC article.
- 2015 Update on Acute Adverse Reactions to Gadolinium based Contrast Agents in Cardiovascular MR. Large Multi-National and Multi-Ethnical Population Experience With 37788 Patients From the EuroCMR Registry.Bruder O, Schneider S, Pilz G, van Rossum AC, Schwitter J, Nothnagel D, Lombardi M, Buss S, Wagner A, Petersen S, Greulich S, Jensen C, Nagel E, Sechtem U, Mahrholdt H.Bruder O, et al.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Jul 14;17(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12968-015-0168-3.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015.PMID:26170152Free PMC article.
- Magnetic resonance imaging. Application to family practice.Goh RH, Somers S, Jurriaans E, Yu J.Goh RH, et al.Can Fam Physician. 1999 Sep;45:2118-28, 2131-2.Can Fam Physician. 1999.PMID:10509224Free PMC article.Review.
- Awareness of Risks Associated with the Use of Plain X-Ray, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Among Emergency Physicians and Comparison with that of Other Physicians: A Survey from Turkey.Demir MC, Akkas M.Demir MC, et al.Med Sci Monit. 2019 Sep 2;25:6587-6597. doi: 10.12659/MSM.918381.Med Sci Monit. 2019.PMID:31476197Free PMC article.
- A practical guide to diagnose lesser-known immediate and delayed contrast media-induced adverse cutaneous reactions.Böhm I, Schild HH.Böhm I, et al.Eur Radiol. 2006 Jul;16(7):1570-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-006-0202-9. Epub 2006 Apr 20.Eur Radiol. 2006.PMID:16770655Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
Related information
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources