Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science
Full text links

Actions

Clinical Trial
.1996 Jun;76(6):507-12.
doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63269-3.

Comparison of ebastine to cetirizine in seasonal allergic rhinitis in adults

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparison of ebastine to cetirizine in seasonal allergic rhinitis in adults

P Gehanno et al. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol.1996 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Second-generation histamine H1-receptor antagonists are accepted first-line systemic therapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis. Ebastine is a new histamine H1-receptor blocker that may differ in efficacy from currently used second-generation agents.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of daily treatment with ebastine, 10 mg, ebastine, 20 mg, or cetirizine, 10 mg, for relieving symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis in adults.

Methods: In this multicenter, double-blind study, outpatients were randomized to one of three parallel treatment groups: ebastine, 10 mg, ebastine, 20 mg, or cetirizine, 10 mg once daily in the morning for a 2-week period. Patients were evaluated clinically according to symptoms, discomfort, and a global assessment at baseline and on days 8 and 15 of treatment. The total symptom score, defined as the sum of the total morning score on the day of evaluation and the total evening score on the preceding day, was the primary efficacy parameter.

Results: Ebastine, 20 mg (n = 111), ebastine, 10 mg (116), and cetirizine, 10 mg (116), were all effective for improving nasal and ocular symptoms. There was, however, a general trend towards more rapid relief of symptoms with ebastine, 20 mg, and this reached statistical significance in some efficacy parameters after the first week of treatment. In a subpopulation of 158 patients who presented with more severe symptoms, statistically significantly greater improvement was seen with ebastine, 20 mg, compared with ebastine, 10 mg, as indicated by the mean change from baseline in the total symptom score averaged over the treatment period (-13.7 +/- 4.7 vs -11.8 +/- 3.8; P =.027) and in the morning symptom score (-6.7 +/- 2.7 vs -5.7 +/- 2.2; P = .042). All three treatments were well tolerated. Dry mouth, headache, and somnolence were the most common adverse events.

Conclusion: Ebastine (10 mg), cetirizine (10 mg), and ebastine (20 mg) administered orally once daily for 2 weeks all appear to be effective for relieving the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Ebastine, 20 mg, may have advantages over ebastine, 10 mg, and cetirizine, 10 mg, in terms of a reduced time to achieve maximal efficacy and a superior level of efficacy in patients with more severe symptoms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Comparison of ebastine with cetirizine.
    Volkerts ER.Volkerts ER.Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Nov;79(5):465-6. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63045-1.Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997.PMID:9396983No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp