Mental models and probabilistic thinking
- PMID:8039361
- DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90028-0
Mental models and probabilistic thinking
Abstract
This paper outlines the theory of reasoning based on mental models, and then shows how this theory might be extended to deal with probabilistic thinking. The same explanatory framework accommodates deduction and induction: there are both deductive and inductive inferences that yield probabilistic conclusions. The framework yields a theoretical conception of strength of inference, that is, a theory of what the strength of an inference is objectively: it equals the proportion of possible states of affairs consistent with the premises in which the conclusion is true, that is, the probability that the conclusion is true given that the premises are true. Since there are infinitely many possible states of affairs consistent with any set of premises, the paper then characterizes how individuals estimate the strength of an argument. They construct mental models, which each correspond to an infinite set of possibilities (or, in some cases, a finite set of infinite sets of possibilities). The construction of models is guided by knowledge and beliefs, including lay conceptions of such matters as the "law of large numbers". The paper illustrates how this theory can account for phenomena of probabilistic reasoning.
Similar articles
- How many kinds of reasoning? Inference, probability, and natural language semantics.Lassiter D, Goodman ND.Lassiter D, et al.Cognition. 2015 Mar;136:123-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.016. Epub 2014 Dec 8.Cognition. 2015.PMID:25497521
- Disjunctive illusory inferences and how to eliminate them.Khemlani S, Johnson-Laird PN.Khemlani S, et al.Mem Cognit. 2009 Jul;37(5):615-23. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.5.615.Mem Cognit. 2009.PMID:19487753
- Is inferential reasoning just probabilistic reasoning in disguise?Markovits H, Handley S.Markovits H, et al.Mem Cognit. 2005 Oct;33(7):1315-23. doi: 10.3758/bf03193231.Mem Cognit. 2005.PMID:16532862
- Conditionals, Context, and the Suppression Effect.Cariani F, Rips LJ.Cariani F, et al.Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;41(3):540-589. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12336. Epub 2016 Feb 1.Cogn Sci. 2017.PMID:26833772Review.
- Uncertainty and the difficulty of thinking through disjunctions.Shafir E.Shafir E.Cognition. 1994 Apr-Jun;50(1-3):403-30. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90038-8.Cognition. 1994.PMID:8039371Review.
Cited by
- Don't believe them! Reducing misinformation influence through source discreditation.Ecker UKH, Prike T, Paver AB, Scott RJ, Swire-Thompson B.Ecker UKH, et al.Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Aug 26;9(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00581-7.Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024.PMID:39183204Free PMC article.
- Brain imaging, forward inference, and theories of reasoning.Heit E.Heit E.Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Jan 9;8:1056. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01056. eCollection 2014.Front Hum Neurosci. 2015.PMID:25620926Free PMC article.Review.
- Neural Correlates of Modal Displacement and Discourse-Updating under (Un)Certainty.Tulling M, Law R, Cournane A, Pylkkänen L.Tulling M, et al.eNeuro. 2021 Jan 14;8(1):ENEURO.0290-20.2020. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0290-20.2020. Print 2021 Jan-Feb.eNeuro. 2021.PMID:33288644Free PMC article.
- Disruption of caudate working memory activation in chronic blast-related traumatic brain injury.Newsome MR, Durgerian S, Mourany L, Scheibel RS, Lowe MJ, Beall EB, Koenig KA, Parsons M, Troyanskaya M, Reece C, Wilde E, Fischer BL, Jones SE, Agarwal R, Levin HS, Rao SM.Newsome MR, et al.Neuroimage Clin. 2015 May 8;8:543-53. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.04.024. eCollection 2015.Neuroimage Clin. 2015.PMID:26110112Free PMC article.
- Reasoning processes in clinical reasoning: from the perspective of cognitive psychology.Shin HS.Shin HS.Korean J Med Educ. 2019 Dec;31(4):299-308. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2019.140. Epub 2019 Nov 29.Korean J Med Educ. 2019.PMID:31813196Free PMC article.Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources