Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

MDPI full text link MDPI Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2025 Mar 13;13(3):87.
doi: 10.3390/sports13030087.

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Heart Rate Prediction Employing Wearable Sensor Data

Affiliations

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Heart Rate Prediction Employing Wearable Sensor Data

Asieh Namazi et al. Sports (Basel)..

Abstract

Monitoring heart rate (HR) is vital for health management and athletic performance, and wearable technology enables scientists to obtain real-time cardiovascular insights. This study compares Machine Learning (ML) techniques, including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), and 1D Convolutional Neural Networks (1D CNNs). Then, we develop a hybrid Singular Spectrum Analysis (SSA)-Augmented ML technique to predict HR using wearable sensor data. Additionally, we investigate the impact of incorporating auxiliary physiological inputs, such as breathing rate (BR) and RR intervals, on predictive accuracy. The study utilizes the cardiorespiratory data acquired through wearable sensors while practising sports, including 126 recordings from 81 participants (53 males, 28 females) engaged in 10 different sports. Physiological signals were collected at 1 Hz using the BioHarness 3.0 (Zephyr Technology, Mangaluru, India). The dataset includes individuals with varied levels of sports experience (beginner, intermediate, and advanced), allowing for a more comprehensive evaluation of HR variability across different expertise levels. Our results demonstrate that the hybrid SSA-LSTM model reaches the lowest prediction error by effectively capturing HR dynamics. Furthermore, integrating HR, BR, and RR data significantly enhances accuracy over single or dual parameter inputs. These findings support adopting multivariate machine learning models for health monitoring, improving HR prediction accuracy for fitness and preventive healthcare.

Keywords: health monitoring; heart rate prediction; machine learning; singular spectrum analysis; wearable sensors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic of Prediction algorithm.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the HR prediction model evaluation process, highlighting key stages from data collection to reproducible workflow.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean of HR’s MAE prediction for the next epochs using SSA + CNN.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean of HR’s MAE prediction for the next epochs using SSA + LSTM.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean of HR’s MAE prediction for the next epochs using SSA + PINNs.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Mean of HR’s MAE prediction for the next epochs using SSA + RNN.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Mean absolute error (MAE) comparison of standalone machine learning (ML) models and SSA-enhanced models in the worst case scenario.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Comparison of prediction errors for standalone ML models and SSA-enhanced models in high-risk samples (90th percentile MAE).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Achten J., Jeukendrup A.E. Heart Rate Monitoring: Applications and Limitations. Sport. Med. 2003;33:517–538. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200333070-00004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schneider M., Mücke S. Implementing Wearable Sensors for Real-time Monitoring in Team Sports: Challenges and Solutions. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2018;18:612–620.
    1. Seshadri D.R., Drummond C., Craker J., Rowbottom J.R., Voos J.E. Wearable Sensors for Monitoring the Physiological and Biochemical Profile of the Athlete. NPJ Digit. Med. 2019;2:72. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0150-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seçkin A.Ç., Ateş B., Seçkin M. Review on Wearable Technology in sports: Concepts, Challenges and opportunities. Appl. Sci. 2023;13:10399. doi: 10.3390/app131810399. - DOI
    1. Latino F., Tafuri F. Wearable Sensors and the Evaluation of Physiological Performance in Elite Field Hockey Players. Sports. 2024;12:124. doi: 10.3390/sports12050124. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
MDPI full text link MDPI Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp