Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

PeerJ, Inc. full text link PeerJ, Inc. Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2024 Jun 12:12:e17483.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.17483. eCollection 2024.

Tick hazard in the South Downs National Park (UK): species, distribution, key locations for future interventions, site density, habitats

Affiliations

Tick hazard in the South Downs National Park (UK): species, distribution, key locations for future interventions, site density, habitats

Jo Middleton et al. PeerJ..

Abstract

Background: South Downs National Park (SDNP) is UK's most visited National Park, and a focus of tick-borne Lyme disease. The first presumed UK autochthonous cases of tick-borne encephalitis and babesiosis were recorded in 2019-20. SDNP aims to conserve wildlife and encourage recreation, so interventions are needed that reduce hazard without negatively affecting ecosystem health. To be successful these require knowledge of site hazards.

Methods: British Deer Society members submitted ticks removed from deer. Key potential intervention sites were selected and six 50 m2 transects drag-sampled per site (mostly twice yearly for 2 years). Ticks were identified in-lab (sex, life stage, species), hazard measured as tick presence, density of ticks (all life stages, DOT), and density of nymphs (DON). Sites and habitat types were analysed for association with hazard. Distribution was mapped by combining our results with records from five other sources.

Results: A total of 87Ixodes ricinus (all but one adults, 82% F) were removed from 14 deer (10Dama dama; threeCapreolus capreolus; one not recorded; tick burden, 1-35) at 12 locations (commonly woodland). Five key potential intervention sites were identified and drag-sampled 2015-16, collecting 623 ticks (238 on-transects): 53.8% nymphs, 42.5% larvae, 3.7% adults (13 M, 10 F). Ticks were present on-transects at all sites:I. ricinus at three (The Mens (TM); Queen Elizabeth Country Park (QECP); Cowdray Estate (CE)),Haemaphysalis punctata at two (Seven Sisters Country Park (SSCP); Ditchling Beacon Nature Reserve (DBNR)). TM had the highest DOT at 30/300 m2 (DON = 30/300 m2), followed by QECP 22/300 m2 (12/300 m2), CE 8/300 m2 (6/300 m2), and SSCP 1/300 m2 (1/300 m2). ForI. ricinus, nymphs predominated in spring, larvae in the second half of summer and early autumn. The overall ranking of site hazard held for DON and DOT from both seasonal sampling periods. DBNR was sampled 2016 only (one adultH. punctata collected). Woodland had significantly greater hazard than downland, but ticks were present at all downland sites.I. ricinus has been identified in 33/37 of SDNPs 10 km2 grid squares,Ixodes hexagonus 10/37,H. punctata 7/37,Dermacentor reticulatus 1/37.

Conclusions: Mapping shows tick hazard broadly distributed across SDNP.I. ricinus was most common, butH. punctata's seeming range expansion is concerning. Recommendations: management of small heavily visited high hazard plots (QECP); post-visit precaution signage (all sites); repellent impregnated clothing for deerstalkers; flock trials to controlH. punctata (SSCP, DBNR). Further research at TM may contribute to knowledge on ecological dynamics underlying infection density and predator re-introduction/protection as public health interventions. Ecological research onH. punctata would aid control. SDNP Authority is ideally placed to link and champion policies to reduce hazard, whilst avoiding or reducing conflict between public health and ecosystem health.

Keywords: Acari; Acarology; Dermacentor reticulatus; Disease ecology; Haemaphysalis punctata; Ixodes ricinus; National parks; Public health; Tick hazard; Ticks.

© 2024 Middleton et al.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Tick sample collection sites in the South Downs National Park.
Sites where ticks had been submitted by deerstalkers or drag-sampled by JM marked by points at 100 m2 resolution. All ticks collected from deer wereIxodes ricinus, which was also the only tick species drag-sampled at Queen Elizabeth Country Park, Cowdray Estate, and The Mens.Haemaphysalis punctata was the only tick drag-sampled at Seven Sisters Country Park and Ditchling Beacon Nature Reserve. Map contains OS data© Crown Copyright (OS OpenData, 2020) and a National Park base layer (unmodified) from Natural England (2020) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/). Map: JM.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Seven Sisters Country Park, and Queen Elizabeth Country Park.
Both sites sampled twice each in 2015 and 2016. Where ticks were present along 50 m2 transects 2-year totals are given (individual samplings in brackets). Photos: JM.
Figure 3
Figure 3. The Mens, and Cowdray Estate.
Both sites sampled twice each in 2015 and 2016. Where ticks were present along 50 m2 transects 2-year totals are given (individual samplings in brackets). Photos: JM.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Site tick-sampling equipment.
JM drag-sampling along a path border at The Mens, West Sussex. (A) Woollen blanket. (B) Woollen chaps. (C) Woollen flags. Design as per Dobson, Taylor & Randolph (2011). Photo: ASR.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Tick species collected.
Ticks collected during study. (A)Ixodes ricinus (drag-sampled at The Mens, West Sussex, 2016). (B)Haemaphysalis punctata (drag-sampled at Ditchling Beacon Nature Reserve, East Sussex, 2016). Photos: JM.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Recorded tick hazard in the South Downs National Park.
(A)Ixodes ricinus. (B)Ixodes hexagonus. (C)Haemaphysalis punctata. (D)Dermacentor reticulatus. Orange OS grid squares indicate the most recent record/s of tick presence are since 2005 (inclusive). Yellow squares indicate the most recent record/s found were prior to 2005 (latest record date shown). Empty squares represent no records found, but should not be taken as on-the-ground tick absence. Map combines our data of drag-sampling and ticks submitted from culled deer, national maps from the Public Health England/Health Protection Agency tick surveillance scheme (Cull et al., 2018; PHE, 2016; HPA, 2013a, 2013b, 2013c, 2013d), the National Biodiversity Network Atlas NBN (2020), Medlock et al. (2018), Layzell et al. (2018), and previously unpublished records from pan-species surveying at Sussex Wildlife Trust reserves (collected by Trust volunteers and staff and supplied directly to the authors for inclusion in this study). In addition, a case report by Phipps et al. (2020) states there wereH. punctata infestations within the confines of Brighton & Hove in 2019. Maps contain OS data© Crown Copyright (OS OpenData, 2020) and a National Park base layer (unmodified) from Natural England (2020) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/). Maps: JM.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Tick attachment sites on sentinel deer.
Ticks collected by British Deer Society members from deer culled for other reasons, attachment sites for four ticks not recorded. Body zones as per Pacilly et al. (2014). *Instructions listed abdomen and sternum as separate zones to record, but for 10 ticks this was not done so zones were merged in this figure (reported attachment sites: abdomen, 24; sternum and abdomen, 10; sternum, 1). Photo: Andreae (2008), use and changes made under CC-BY-SA-2.0 which also applies to this figure. Original:https://web.archive.org/web/20200930080151/https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fallow_deer_in_field_%28cropped%29.jpg.
Figure 8
Figure 8. Ticks collected on-transect (by life stage, species, month, and seasonal sampling period) from sites in the South Downs National Park drag-sampled both 2015 and 2016.
Densities of nymphs and densities of ticks (all life stages) are provided in the main text for each site, calculated by seasonal sampling periods, and on overall multi-year basis. Number of ticks obtained along transects at each sampling, collection dates and environmental data, Tables S1–S4.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Abdullah S, Helps C, Tasker S, Newbury H, Wall R. Ticks infesting domestic dogs in the UK: a large-scale surveillance programme. Parasites & Vectors. 2016;9(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1673-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andreae J. The fallow deer (image and license) 2008.https://web.archive.org/web/20200930080151/https://commons.wikimedia.org.... [8 October 2020].https://web.archive.org/web/20200930080151/https://commons.wikimedia.org...
    1. Baker A. Mites and ticks of domestic animals: an identification guide and information source. London: Natural History Museum; 1999.
    1. Balashov YS. Bloodsucking ticks (Ixodoidea)-vectors of diseases of man and animals. Entomological Society of America Miscellaneous Publications Journal. 1972;8:163–376.
    1. Beati L, Needham G, Klompen H. Ixididae: key to genera based on larvae. In: Beati L, Needham G, Klompen H, editors. Medical and Veterinary Acarology Tick Week 2016 [Training Manual] Columbus: Ohio State University Acarology Lab; 2016.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
PeerJ, Inc. full text link PeerJ, Inc. Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp