Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Frontiers Media SA full text link Frontiers Media SA Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

.2024 May 30:11:1401909.
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1401909. eCollection 2024.

Aspirin eugenol ester affects ileal barrier function, inflammatory response and microbiota in broilers under lipopolysaccharide-induced immune stress conditions

Affiliations

Aspirin eugenol ester affects ileal barrier function, inflammatory response and microbiota in broilers under lipopolysaccharide-induced immune stress conditions

Ruilin Zhang et al. Front Vet Sci..

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of aspirin eugenol ester (AEE) on ileal immune function in broilers under lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced immune stress.

Methods: Two hundred and forty one-day-old male Arbor Acres chicks were randomly divided into four groups (saline, LPS, saline + AEE and LPS + AEE) with six replicates of ten broilers each. The saline group and LPS group were fed the normal diet, while the other two groups received normal diet plus 0.1 g/kg AEE. Broilers in the LPS and LPS + AEE groups were injected intraperitoneally with 0.5 mg/kg B.W LPS in saline for seven consecutive days beginning at 14 days of age, while broilers in the saline and saline + AEE groups were injected with saline only.

Results: The results showed that AEE improved the ileal morphology and increased the ratio of villus height to crypt depth of immune-stressed broilers. LPS-induced immune stress significantly reduced the expression of the genes for the tight junction proteinsoccludin, zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1),claudin-1 andclaudin-2, in the ileum, while AEE significantly up-regulated the expression of these genes. Compared with the saline group, the LPS-treated chickens showed significantly increased mRNA expression of the inflammatory factors tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and microsomal Prostaglandin E Synthesase-1 (mPGES-1) in the ileum, while they were significantly decreased by AEE supplementation. In addition, analysis of the ileal bacterial composition showed that compared with saline and LPS + AEE groups, the proportion of Firmicutes andLactobacillus in the LPS group was lower, while the proportion of Proteobacteria andEscherichia-Shigella was higher. Similarly, Line Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis showed that compared with the LPS group,Brevibacillus was dominant in the saline group, while the LPS + AEE group was rich inRhizobium,Lachnoclostridium, Ruminococcaceae,Faecalibacterium,Negativibacillus, Oscillospiraceae, andFlavonifractor.

Conclusion: These results indicate that dietary supplementation with 0.1 g/kg AEE could protect the intestinal health by improving the intestinal villus morphology, enhancing the expression of tight junction genes and alleviating inflammation to resist the immune stress caused by LPS stimulation in broilers, and the mechanism may involveCOX-2-related signal transduction and improved intestinal microbiota composition.

Keywords: aspirin eugenol ester; broiler; ileal microbiota; immune stress; intestinal barrier function.

Copyright © 2024 Zhang, Bai, Zhen, Hu, Zhang, Zhong, Zhang, Ito, Zhang, Yang, Li and Ma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effects of AEE on ileal morphology in immune-stressed broilers.(A) Morphological structure of ileal tissue.(B) Villus height.(C) Crypt depth.(D) V/C, ratio of villus height to crypt depth. Each vertical bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 6). Bars with different letters differed significantly (p < 0.05). Scale bar, 200 μm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effects of AEE on relative expression of tight junction protein mRNA in the ileum of immune-stressed broilers. Relative expression ofoccludin(A),ZO-1(B),claudin-1(C), andclaudin-2(D) mRNA in ileum. The gene for GAPDH was used as a reference for normalization. Each vertical bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 6). Bars with different letters differed significantly (p < 0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of AEE on relative mRNA expression of inflammatory cytokines in the ileum of immune-stressed broilers. Relative mRNA expression ofTNF-α(A),IL-1β(B),IL-6(C),IL-10(D),COX-2(E), andmPGES-1(F) in ileum. The gene for GAPDH was used as a reference for normalization. Each vertical bar represents the mean ± SEM (n = 6). Bars with different letters differed significantly (p < 0.05).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effects of AEE on ileal microbiota composition and diversity in immune-stressed broilers. Alpha-diversity indicated by observed Simpson(A) and Shannon(B) index. Venn diagram showing overlap of compositions of bacterial OTUs in different groups(C). Beta-diversity indicated by principal component analysis (PCA) on the phylum level(D). Average relative abundances of dominant bacterial phylum(E) and genus level(F) in ileum under different treatments.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Cladograms and bar plots obtained by LEfSe analysis showed differences in microbiota between the treatment groups. LEfSe analysis of the saline and LPS groups(A). LEfSe analysis of the LPS and LPS + AEE groups(B). LEfSe analysis of the saline and saline + AEE groups(C). The different color nodes in cladogram represent the microbial groups that are significantly enriched in the corresponding group and have a significant effect on the difference between the groups. Light yellow nodes represent microbial groups that do not differ significantly between groups, or have no significant effect on differences between groups. The LDA scores represent the effect size of each abundant species. The bar plots show the microbiota with LDA score > 2, which is a biomarker of statistical difference (LDA score threshold = 2).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Jiang S, Yan F-F, Hu J-Y, Mohammed A, Cheng H-W. Bacillus subtilis-based probiotic improves skeletal health and immunity in broiler chickens exposed to heat stress. Animals (Basel). (2021) 11:1494. doi: 10.3390/ani11061494, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu K, Zhen W, Bai D, Tan H, He X, Li Y, et al. . Lipopolysaccharide-induced immune stress negatively regulates broiler chicken growth via the COX-2-PGE2-EP4 signaling pathway. Front Immunol. (2023) 14:1193798. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1193798, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao L, Liu M, Sun H, Yang J-C, Huang Y-X, Huang J-Q, et al. . Selenium deficiency-induced multiple tissue damage with dysregulation of immune and redox homeostasis in broiler chicks under heat stress. Sci China Life Sci. (2023) 66:2056–69. doi: 10.1007/s11427-022-2226-1, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mowat AM, Agace WW. Regional specialization within the intestinal immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. (2014) 14:667–85. doi: 10.1038/nri3738 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garrett WS, Gordon JI, Glimcher LH. Homeostasis and inflammation in the intestine. Cell. (2010) 140:859–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.023, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Related information

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The research was supported in part by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFE0111100), the Key Scientific Research Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Henan Province (22A230001), the Science Foundation for Expat Scientist Studio for Animal Stress and Health Breeding of Henan Province (Grant Number GZS2021006), and the Program for International S&T Cooperation Projects of Henan (232102521012).

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Frontiers Media SA full text link Frontiers Media SA Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp