Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Frontiers Media SA full text link Frontiers Media SA Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

.2024 Mar 11:15:1354040.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1354040. eCollection 2024.

Potential for the development ofTaraxacum mongolicum aqueous extract as a phytogenic feed additive for poultry

Affiliations

Potential for the development ofTaraxacum mongolicum aqueous extract as a phytogenic feed additive for poultry

Zhen Dong et al. Front Immunol..

Abstract

Introduction:Taraxacum mongolicum (TM) is a kind of medicinal and edible homologous plant which is included in the catalogue of feed raw materials in China. It is rich in polyphenols, flavonoids, polysaccharides and other active substances, and shows many benefits to livestock, poultry and aquatic products. The study aimed to assess the potential of TM aqueous extract (TMAE) as a substitute for poultry AGPs.

Methods: A total of 240 one-day-old Arbor Acker broilers were randomly assigned to four groups and fed a basal diet (Con) supplemented with 500, 1000, and 2000 mg/kg TMAE (Low, Medium, and High groups). The growth performance of the broilers was measured on day 21 and day 42. At the end of the trial, the researchers measured slaughter performance and collected serum, liver, spleen, ileum, and intestinal contents to investigate the effects of TMAE on serum biochemistry, antioxidant capacity, immune function, organ coefficient, intestinal morphology, flora composition, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs).

Results: The results showed that broilers treated with TMAE had a significantly higher average daily gain from 22 to 42 days old compared to the Con group. Various doses of TMAE resulted in different levels of improvement in serum chemistry. High doses increased serum alkaline phosphatase and decreased creatinine. TMAE also increased the antioxidant capacity of serum, liver, and ileum in broilers. Additionally, middle and high doses of TMAE enhanced the innate immune function of the liver (IL-10) and ileum (Occludin) in broilers. Compared to the control group, the TMAE treatment group exhibited an increase in the ratio of villi length to villi crypt in the duodenum. TMAE increased the abundance of beneficial bacteria, such asAlistipes and Lactobacillus, while reducing the accumulation of harmful bacteria, such asColidextracter andSellimonas. The cecum's SCFAs content increased with a medium dose of TMAE. Supplementing broiler diets with TMAE at varying doses enhanced growth performance and overall health. The most significant benefits were observed at a dose of 1000 mg/kg, including improved serum biochemical parameters, intestinal morphology, antioxidant capacity of the liver and ileum, immune function of the liver and ileum, and increased SCFAs content.Lactobacillus aviarius, norank_f_norank_o__Clostridia_UCG-014, andFlavonifractor are potentially dominant members of the intestinal microflora.

Conclusion: In conclusion, TMAE is a promising poultry feed additive and 1000 mg/kg is an effective reference dose.

Keywords: AGPs alternatives; Taraxacum mongolicum; antioxidant; broilers; growth performance; immune; intestinal flora.

Copyright © 2024 Dong, Liu, Xu, Tan, Sun, Ai, Yang and Zeng.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

QA was employed by DHN Business Division, but the sponsors had no role in the design, execution, interpretation, or writing of the study. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer ZS declared a shared affiliation with the authors ZD, ZL, YX, BT, WS, ZY and JZ to the handling editor at time of review.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Total antioxidant capacity results for TMAE.(A) ABTS free radical scavenging ability;(B) Iron ion reduction antioxidant capacity. Data in the same row with no or same superscript letters indicate non-significant differences (P > 0.05), and different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of TMAE supplementation on small intestinal microflora of broilers.(A, B) Effect of TMAE on intestinal microbial alpha diversity (Shannon and Simpson index);(C–E) Colony composition of small intestinal microorganisms at phylum, genus and species levels after TMAE addition;(F) Intestinal microbial beta diversity analysis.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of TMAE supplementation on cecal microorganism of broilers.(A, B) Effect of TMAE on Cecal Microbial Alpha Diversity (Shannon and Simpson index);(C) Cecal microbial beta diversity analysis;(D–F) Colony composition of cecal microorganisms at phylum, genus and species levels after TMAE addition;(G) Differentiation of enterobacteria at the genus level using the Kruskal-Wallis H test;(H) Effect of TMAE on Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Heatmap of correlation analysis between cecal microorganisms and SCFAs. Statistical differences were recorded as P<0.05 (*), P<0.01 (**) and P<0.001 (***), respectively.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Van TTH, Yidana Z, Smooker PM, Coloe PJ. Antibiotic use in food animals worldwide, with a focus on Africa: Pluses and minuses. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. (2020) 20:170–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.07.031 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abd El-Hack ME, El-Saadony MT, Shafi ME, Qattan SYA, Batiha GE, Khafaga AF, et al. . Probiotics in poultry feed: A comprehensive review. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). (2020) 104:1835–50. doi: 10.1111/jpn.13454 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jimenez CEP, Keestra S, Tandon P, Cumming O, Pickering AJ, Moodley A, et al. . Biosecurity and water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions in animal agricultural settings for reducing infection burden, antibiotic use, and antibiotic resistance: a One Health systematic review. Lancet Planet Health. (2023) 7:e418–34. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00049-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Olaru ID, Walther B, Schaumburg F. Zoonotic sources and the spread of antimicrobial resistance from the perspective of low and middle-income countries. Infect Dis Poverty. (2023) 12:59. doi: 10.1186/s40249-023-01113-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Avillan JJ, Ahmadvand P, Lu S-Y, Horton J, Liu J, Lofgren E, et al. . Excreted antibiotics may be key to emergence of increasingly efficient antibiotic resistance in food animal production. Appl Environ Microbiol. (2022) 88:e0079122. doi: 10.1128/aem.00791-22 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Related information

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by Hunan Provincial Key Research and Development Project, grant number 2023NK2021 and China Agriculture Research System, grant number CARS-21.

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Frontiers Media SA full text link Frontiers Media SA Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp