High pre-Delta and early-Omicron SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence detected in dried blood samples from Kinshasa (D.R. Congo)
- PMID:38516764
- DOI: 10.1002/jmv.29529
High pre-Delta and early-Omicron SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence detected in dried blood samples from Kinshasa (D.R. Congo)
Abstract
Studies on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in sub-Saharan Africa have yielded varying results, although authors universally agree the real burden surpasses reported cases. The primary objective of this study was to determine SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among patients attending Monkole Hospital in Kinshasa (D.R. Congo). The secondary objective was to evaluate the analytic performance of two chemiluminescence platforms: Elecsys® (Roche) and VirClia® (Vircell) on dried blood spot samples (DBS). The study population (N = 373) was recruited in two stages: a mid-2021 blood donor cohort (15.5% women) and a mid-2022 women cohort. Crude global seroprevalence was 61% (53.9%-67.8%) pre-Delta in 2021 and 90.2% (84.7%-94.2%) post-Omicron in 2022. Anti-spike (S) antibody levels significantly increased from 53.1 (31.8-131.3) U/mL in 2021 to 436.5 (219.3-950.5) U/mL in 2022 and were significantly higher above 45 years old in the 2022 population. Both platforms showed good analytic performance on DBS samples: sensitivity was 96.8% for IgG (antiN/S) (93.9%-98.5%) and 96.0% (93.0%-98.0%) for anti-S quantification. These results provide additional support for the notion that exposure to SARS-CoV-2 is more widespread than indicated by case-based surveillance and will be able to guide the pandemic response and strategy moving forward. Likewise, this study contributes evidence to the reliability of DBS as a tool for serological testing and diagnosis in resource-limited settings.
Keywords: COVID‐19; DBS; SARS‐CoV‐2; chemiluminescence; seroprevalence; sub‐Saharan Africa.
© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Medical Virology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
- Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497‐506. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5
- ECDC. SARS‐CoV‐2 variants of concern as of 9 June 2022. Published 2022. Accessed April 4, 2023.https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19/variants-concern
- WHO. Coronavirus disease (COVID‐19): Variants of SARS‐COV‐2. Published 2021. Accessed April 4, 2023.https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/question...
- Otshudiema JO, Folefack GLT, Nsio JM, et al. Epidemiological comparison of four COVID‐19 waves in the democratic republic of the Congo, March 2020–January 2022. J Epidemiol Global Health. 2022;12(3):316‐327. doi:10.1007/S44197-022-00052-6
- Lau H, Khosrawipour T, Kocbach P, Ichii H, Bania J, Khosrawipour V. Evaluating the massive underreporting and undertesting of COVID‐19 cases in multiple global epicenters. Pulmonology. 2021;27(2):110‐115. doi:10.1016/j.pulmoe.2020.05.015
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
