Personalization: a new political arithmetic?
- PMID:38013839
- PMCID: PMC10503135
- DOI: 10.1080/1600910X.2022.2098352
Personalization: a new political arithmetic?
Abstract
Scholarship on the history of political arithmetic highlights its significance for classical liberalism, a political philosophy in which subjects perceive themselves as autonomous individuals in an abstract system called society. This society and its component individuals became intelligible and governable in a deluge of printed numbers, assisted by the development of statistics, the emergence of a common space of measurement, and the calculation of probabilities. Our proposal is that the categories, numbers, and norms of this political arithmetic have changed in a ubiquitous culture of personalization. Today's political arithmetic, we suggest, produces a different kind of society, what Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg calls the 'default social'. We address this new social as a 'vague whole' and propose that it is characterized by a continuous present, the contemporary form of simultaneity or way of being together that Benedict Anderson argued is fundamental to any kind of imagined community. Like the society imagined in the earlier arithmetic, this vague whole is an abstraction that obscures forms of stratification and discrimination.
Keywords: Personalization; continuous present; participation; political arithmetic; precision; prediction; vague whole.
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Figures










Similar articles
- Political power beyond the State: problematics of government. 1992.Rose N, Miller P.Rose N, et al.Br J Sociol. 2010 Jan;61 Suppl 1:271-303. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2009.01247.x.Br J Sociol. 2010.PMID:20092498
- How political philosophies can help to discuss and differentiate theories in community ecology.Voigt A.Voigt A.Hist Philos Life Sci. 2021 Apr 9;43(2):54. doi: 10.1007/s40656-021-00401-x.Hist Philos Life Sci. 2021.PMID:33835286Free PMC article.
- [Today's meaning of classical authors of political thinking].Weinacht PL.Weinacht PL.Wurzbg Medizinhist Mitt. 2005;24:474-96.Wurzbg Medizinhist Mitt. 2005.PMID:17153317German.
- Introduction.Grabham E, Beynon-Jones SM.Grabham E, et al.In: Beynon-Jones SM, Grabham E, editors. Law and Time. Oxon (UK): Routledge; 2019.In: Beynon-Jones SM, Grabham E, editors. Law and Time. Oxon (UK): Routledge; 2019.PMID:30964621Free Books & Documents.Review.
- The theorisation of 'best interests' in bioethical accounts of decision-making.Birchley G.Birchley G.BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jun 1;22(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00636-0.BMC Med Ethics. 2021.PMID:34074274Free PMC article.Review.
Cited by
- 'In the picture': perspectives on living and working with cancer.Day S, Gleason K, Lury C, Sherlock D, Viney W, Ward H.Day S, et al.Med Humanit. 2023 Mar;49(1):83-92. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2022-012392. Epub 2022 Aug 4.Med Humanit. 2023.PMID:35927002Free PMC article.
References
- Amoore, L. 2013. The Politics of possibility: risk and security beyond probability. Durham: Duke University Press.
- Amoore, L. 2020. Cloud ethics: algorithms and the attributes of ourselves and others. Durham: Duke University Press.
- Anderson, B. 2006. [1983]. Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
- Beauvisage, T., and Mellet K.. 2020. Datassets: assetizing and marketizing personal data. In Turning things into assets, eds. Birch K., and Muniesa F., 75–95. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/12075.001.0001. - DOI
- Birch, K., and Muniesa F.. 2020. Assetization: Turning Things into assets in Technoscientific capitalism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Related information
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources