Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Nature Publishing Group full text link Nature Publishing Group Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2023 Sep 8;13(1):14849.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41739-5.

Eyelash length attractiveness across ethnicities

Affiliations

Eyelash length attractiveness across ethnicities

Farid Pazhoohi et al. Sci Rep..

Abstract

Eyelashes evolved to protect eyes. An optimum eyelash length functions to protect eyes from external hazards such as contaminations, excessive evaporation or shear stress from airflow. They can also be an indicator of a person's health as various congenital and noncongenital diseases can lead to short or long eyelashes. The current study aimed to extend a recent investigation on the preference for eyelash length in humans from an evolutionary adaptive perspective. Specifically, the current study tested whether the inverted-U function for eyelash length preference recently reported for White faces, generalises to other ethnicities, and whether ethnic background modulates preference for eyelash lengths. To investigate this question, men and women of Asian, Black, and White ethnicities from the U.S. rated the attractiveness of female Indian, Asian, Black, and White faces with varying eyelash lengths. The eyelashes ranged in length from no eyelashes to half the width of an eye. Results showed that Asian, Black, and White men and women preference for eyelash length followed an inverted-U function across all four ethnicities, supporting a general preference for human eyelash length that is approximately one-third the width of an eye. In addition, the results showed that the most attractive eyelashes for Black women were skewed toward a greater eyelash-length to eye-width ratio when compared to the other images. The source of this skew is presently unknown, as it could reflect a change in perceptual sensitivity to eyelash length with skin colour or changes in preference related to perceptions of participants' ethnicity.

© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Examples (a) Indian, (b) Black, (c) Asian, and (d) White faces varying in eyelash length to eye width ratio; left images 0, middle images 0.25, and right images 0.50 ratios.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Ratings of attractiveness (means ± 95% CI) for Asian participants rating Indian, Black, Asian and White female faces with different eyelash length to eye width ratios (L/W), (b) Ratings of attractiveness (means ± 95% ci) for black participants rating Indian, Black, Asian and White female faces with different L/W ratios, and (c) Ratings of attractiveness (means ± 95% ci) for white participants rating Indian, Black, Asian and White female faces with different L/W ratios. Means not sharing the same letters are significantly different (p < 0.01). For example, for Asian participants rating Indian faces, ratios 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, and 0.35 are indicated by the letter ‘a’, meaning they are not significantly different from each other. Similarly, ratios 0.15, 0.20, and 0.35, share letter ‘b’ meaning they are not significantly different from each other. However, ratios 0.25 and 0.30 are different from 0.15, as they do not share a similar letter.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Pazhoohi F, Kingstone A. The effect of eyelash length on attractiveness: A previously uninvestigated indicator of beauty. Evol. Behav. Sci. 2022;16:176–180. doi: 10.1037/ebs0000243. - DOI
    1. Amador GJ, et al. Eyelashes divert airflow to protect the eye. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2015;12:20141294. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.1294. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gangestad SW, Scheyd GJ. The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2005;34:523–548. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143733. - DOI
    1. Grammar K, Fink B, Moller AP, Thornhill R. Darwinian aesthetics: Sexual selection and the biology of beauty. Biol. Rev. 2003;78:385–407. doi: 10.1017/S1464793102006085. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kumar A, Karthikeyan K. Madarosis: A marker of many maladies. Int. J. Trichol. 2012;4:3–18. doi: 10.4103/0974-7753.96079. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Nature Publishing Group full text link Nature Publishing Group Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp