Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

MDPI full text link MDPI Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Meta-Analysis
.2023 May 21;21(5):316.
doi: 10.3390/md21050316.

Efficacy and Security of Tetrodotoxin in the Treatment of Cancer-Related Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy and Security of Tetrodotoxin in the Treatment of Cancer-Related Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Miguel Á Huerta et al. Mar Drugs..

Abstract

The pharmacological treatment of cancer-related pain is unsatisfactory. Tetrodotoxin (TTX) has shown analgesia in preclinical models and clinical trials, but its clinical efficacy and safety have not been quantified. For this reason, our aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical evidence that was available. A systematic literature search was conducted in four electronic databases (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov) up to 1 March 2023 in order to identify published clinical studies evaluating the efficacy and security of TTX in patients with cancer-related pain, including chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain. Five articles were selected, three of which were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The number of responders to the primary outcome (≥30% improvement in the mean pain intensity) and those suffering adverse events in the intervention and placebo groups were used to calculate effect sizes using the log odds ratio. The meta-analysis showed that TTX significantly increased the number of responders (mean = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.19-1.16,p = 0.0065) and the number of patients suffering non-severe adverse events (mean = 1.13; 95% CI: 0.31-1.95,p = 0.0068). However, TTX did not increase the risk of suffering serious adverse events (mean = 0.75; 95% CI: -0.43-1.93,p = 0.2154). In conclusion, TTX showed robust analgesic efficacy but also increased the risk of suffering non-severe adverse events. These results should be confirmed in further clinical trials with higher numbers of patients.

Keywords: cancer-related pain; chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy; meta-analysis; neuropathic pain; systematic review; tetrodotoxin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study selection flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of the analgesic efficacy of TTX in cancer-related pain [39,41,42]. Forest plot depicting the increase in patients achieving a ≥ 30% reduction in the mean pain intensity, as measured using the log odds ratio in a random-effects model. CI, confidence interval; RE, random-effects.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Safety of TTX in cancer-related pain RCTs analyzed using a random-effects model [39,41,42]. (A) This forest plot shows the log odds ratio versus placebo of suffering at least 1 adverse event related to the intervention. (B) This forest plot shows the log odds ratio versus placebo of suffering any serious adverse event. CI, confidence interval; RE, random-effects.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Summary of the risk of bias assessment of the RCTs with the Risk of Bias 2 (Rob2) tool [39,41,42].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Funnel plot analyzing publication bias, including the trim and fill method.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Everdingen M.H.J.v.d.B., Hochstenbach L.M.J., Joosten E.A.J., Tjan-Heijnen V.C.G., Janssen D.J.A. Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients with Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Pain. Symptom. Manag. 2016;51:1070–1090.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.340. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boström B., Sandh M., Lundberg D., Fridlund B. Cancer-Related Pain in Palliative Care: Patients’ Perceptions of Pain Management. J. Adv. Nurs. 2004;45:410–419. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02924.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Breivik H., Cherny N., Collett B., de Conno F., Filbet M., Foubert A.J., Cohen R., Dow L. Cancer-Related Pain: A Pan-European Survey of Prevalence, Treatment, and Patient Attitudes. Ann. Oncol. 2009;20:1420–1433. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahles T.A., Blanchard E.B., Ruckdeschel J.C. The Multidimensional Nature of Cancer-Related Pain. Pain. 1983;17:277. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90100-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lema M.J., Foley K.M., Hausheer F.H. Types and Epidemiology of Cancer-Related Neuropathic Pain: The Intersection of Cancer Pain and Neuropathic Pain. Oncologist. 2010;15:3–8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-S505. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
MDPI full text link MDPI Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp