Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2023 Mar 29;9(4):e14976.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14976. eCollection 2023 Apr.

Eco-sustainability analysis of precast-concrete utility poles manufacturing-A case study from Pakistan

Affiliations

Eco-sustainability analysis of precast-concrete utility poles manufacturing-A case study from Pakistan

Rizwan Rasheed et al. Heliyon..

Abstract

The civil construction sector is a major contributor to the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), and accounts for 40 to 50% of the total GHGs emissions produced all over the world. Concrete utility poles are considered as pillars of power distribution systems in many developing regions of the world. This study has analysed the environmental sustainability of low-tension (LT) and high-tension (HT) types of precast-concrete (PC) poles used for power distribution in Pakistan. Life cycle analysis (LCA) method is used for the assessment of environmental burdens associated with the production-manufacturing stages of these PC poles. The LCA scores are illustrated for five impact categories: climate change, acidification, eutrophication, fine-particulate matter formation and fossil resource scarcity. The significant impact scores have been depicted in climate change and abiotic resource depletion categories as; 4.60E+01 kg CO2 eq. and 1.24 E+01 kg oil eq (for LT PC pole) and 1.55E+02 kg CO2 eq and 3.00E+01 kg oil eq (for HT PC pole), respectively. The analytics further depict that the manufacturing of PC pole is a highly energy intensive process, with significant hauling of raw materials and finished product which causes significant emissions and impact towards climate change and fossil resources depletion. Overall, this research can offer several novel contributions to the field of sustainable development and civil engineering, including a comprehensive analysis of the environmental impacts of the manufacturing process, the development of sustainable practices and technologies and the identification of the links between sustainable development and economic growth.

Keywords: Eco-footprint; LCA; Pakistan; Power distribution system; Sustainable construction and development.

© 2023 The Authors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Process flow of PC Poles.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Process flow and LCA system boundary of PC poles.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Relative contributions of input/output materials as per functional unit to the selected midpoint categories (CCP: Climate change potential, TA: Terrestrial acidification, FE: Freshwater eutrophication, FPMF: Fine particulate matter formation, and ARD: Abiotic resource depletion).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Climate change impact contributions by input and output materials of LT and HT PC poles.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Terrestrial acidification contribution by input and output materials of LT and HT PC poles.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Freshwater eutrophication contributions by input and output materials of LT and HT PC poles.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Fine particulate matter formation impact contributions by input and output materials of LT and HT PC poles.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Abiotic resource depletion impact contributions by input and output materials of LT and HT PC poles.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Sensitivity analysis of the LCA impact scores.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Rasheed R., Rizwan A., Javed H., Yasar A., Tabinda A.B., Bhatti S.G., Su Y. An analytical study to predict the future of Pakistan's energy sustainability versus rest of South Asia. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments. 2020;39
    1. Wang B.Z., Zhu Z.H., Yang E., Chen Z., Wang X.H. Assessment and management of air emissions and environmental impacts from the construction industry. J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 2018;61(14):2421–2444.
    1. Norouzi M., Chàfer M., Cabeza L.F., Jiménez L., Boer D. Circular economy in the building and construction sector: a scientific evolution analysis. J Build. 2021;Eng44
    1. Dahlbo H., Bachér J., Lähtinen K., Jouttijärvi T., Suoheimo P., Mattila T., Saramäki K. Construction and demolition waste management–a holistic evaluation of environmental performance. J. Clean. Prod. 2015;107:333–341.
    1. Vieira D.R., Calmon J.L., Coelho F.Z. Life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the manufacturing of common and ecological concrete: a review. Construct. Build. Mater. 2016;124:656–666.

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp