Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

American Chemical Society full text link American Chemical Society Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2023 Feb 13;63(3):1012-1027.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01503. Epub 2023 Jan 24.

Identification of Novel CB2 Ligands through Virtual Screening and In Vitro Evaluation

Affiliations

Identification of Novel CB2 Ligands through Virtual Screening and In Vitro Evaluation

Adam Stasiulewicz et al. J Chem Inf Model..

Abstract

Cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2) is a very promising therapeutic target for a variety of potential indications. However, despite the existence of multiple high affinity CB2 ligands, none have yet been approved as a drug. Therefore, it would be beneficial to explore new chemotypes of CB2 ligands. The recent elucidation of CB2 tertiary structure allows for rational hit identification with structure-based (SB) methods. In this study, we established a virtual screening workflow based on SB techniques augmented with ligand-based ones, including molecular docking, MM-GBSA binding energy calculations, pharmacophore screening, and QSAR. We screened nearly 7 million drug-like, commercially available compounds. We selected 16 molecules for in vitro evaluation and identified two novel, selective CB2 antagonists withKi values of 65 and 210 nM. Both compounds are structurally diverse from CB2 ligands known to date. The established virtual screening protocol may prove useful for hit identification for CB2 and similar molecular targets. The two novel CB2 ligands provide a desired starting point for future optimization and development of potential drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of CB2 based on PDB ID 6PT0. (A) CB2–ligand–G-proteincomplex. CB2, green. G-protein subunits: α, red; β, blue;γ, orange; ligand, gray (stick representation). (B) CB2 orthostericbinding site—view from the extracellular side with marked structuralelements responsible for ligand binding. TM, transmembrane helix;ECL2,extracellular loop 2. (C) Ligands present in PDB-deposited CB2structures: AM-10257 (PDB ID 5ZTY), AM-12033 (6KPC, 6KPF), and WIN 55,212-2 (6PT0).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Complex pharmacophorecreated by merging pharmacophores basedon PDB IDs 6KPC and 6PT0 aftersuperposition on reference points. (B) Pharmacophore from panel Awith manual modifications introduced to account for frequent occurrenceof aromatic rings in the center of the ligand and rare H-bonds. Greenarrow, H-bond donor; red arrow, H-bond acceptor; yellow sphere, hydrophobic;blue star, positive ionizable; blue ring, aromatic ring. (C) Structuralformulas of the two ligands used to create the pharmacophore. Placementof manually added aromatic ring descriptors is shown as blue circles.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schemes of the workflow used in this study.(A) Main steps employedin the screening along with the number of compounds left after eachstep. (B) A scheme showing the detailed order of utilized techniques,especially docking to CB2 structures from PDB IDs 5ZTY and 6KPC and to the CB2 modelbased on MD of PDB ID 6PT0.
Figure 4
Figure 4
CB2–ligand complexes.(A–C) Binding sites with ligands(green) and amino acids (gray) important for ligand binding depictedin stick representation. PDB IDs 5ZTY, 6KPC, and 6PT0, respectively. (D–F) 2D interactionschemes generated using Schrödinger Maestro. Additionally,we marked with gray, dashed circles the amino acids that are too faraway from the ligand to create protein–ligand interactionsin deposited structures but probably do so alternately, for limitedperiods of time in natural, nonstatic complexes.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(A) Radioligand displacement curves for two screened compoundswith the lowestKi values toward humanCB2—AS-5 and AS-7. WIN 55,212-2 was issued as the referencecompound. Both identified CB2 ligands exhibit desired nanomolarKi and structural distinctiveness compared tothe other known compounds with high affinity for CB2. (B) Inhibitionof CP-55,940-stimulated [35S]GTPγS at the CB2 receptorby the compounds at 10 μM. Results were expressed as mean percentof basal [35S]GTPγS binding in the presence of 100nM CP-55,940 as stimulating ligand. AM-630 served as a reference CB2antagonist. Basal binding was set to 100% and is represented by thedotted line. Data was collected from three separate experiments andanalyzed with the two-tailedt test. Statisticalsignificance was depicted as follows: **p < 0.01;***p < 0.001.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Best identified compound—AS-7 (green) docked toCB2 modelsbased on PDB IDs 5ZTY (A), 6KPC (B) and 6PT0 MD-derived structure (C). Yellow dashed line,H-bond; teal dashed line, π–π interaction. (D)CB2–WIN 55,212-2 (magenta) complex from the largest 6PT0 MDcluster with AS-7 (green) docked to this model. The superpositionshows, that despite the different chemotypes, the binding modes ofboth ligands exhibit similarities, mainly in the placement of themorpholine moieties and carbonyl oxygen atoms and to a lesser extentin the location of two AS-7 benzene rings in similar positions toWIN 55,212-2 central tricyclic moiety and naphthyl group.
Figure 7
Figure 7
AS-5 (green) docked to CB2 models based on PDB IDs 5ZTY (A) and 6PT0 MD-derived structure(B). Yellow dashed line, H-bond; teal dashed line, π–πinteraction.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Di Marzo V.; Piscitelli F. The Endocannabinoid System and its Modulation by Phytocannabinoids. Neurotherapeutics 2015, 12, 692–698. 10.1007/s13311-015-0374-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aizpurua-Olaizola O.; Elezgarai I.; Rico-Barrio I.; Zarandona I.; Etxebarria N.; Usobiaga A. Targeting the Endocannabinoid System: Future Therapeutic Strategies. Drug Discovery Today 2017, 22, 105–110. 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.08.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stasiulewicz A.; Znajdek K.; Grudzień M.; Pawiński T.; Sulkowska J. I. A Guide to Targeting the Endocannabinoid System in Drug Design. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2778.10.3390/ijms21082778. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dhopeshwarkar A.; Mackie K. CB2 Cannabinoid Receptors as a Therapeutic Target—What Does the Future Hold?. Mol. Pharmacol. 2014, 86, 430–437. 10.1124/mol.114.094649. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morales P.; Hernandez-Folgado L.; Goya P.; Jagerovic N. Cannabinoid Receptor 2 (CB2) Agonists and Antagonists: A Patent Update. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2016, 26, 843–856. 10.1080/13543776.2016.1193157. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
American Chemical Society full text link American Chemical Society Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp