Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

MDPI full text link MDPI Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Review
.2022 Dec 26;7(1):1.
doi: 10.3390/epigenomes7010001.

Environmental Adaptation of Genetically Uniform Organisms with the Help of Epigenetic Mechanisms-An Insightful Perspective on Ecoepigenetics

Affiliations
Review

Environmental Adaptation of Genetically Uniform Organisms with the Help of Epigenetic Mechanisms-An Insightful Perspective on Ecoepigenetics

Günter Vogt. Epigenomes..

Abstract

Organisms adapt to different environments by selection of the most suitable phenotypes from the standing genetic variation or by phenotypic plasticity, the ability of single genotypes to produce different phenotypes in different environments. Because of near genetic identity, asexually reproducing populations are particularly suitable for the investigation of the potential and molecular underpinning of the latter alternative in depth. Recent analyses on the whole-genome scale of differently adapted clonal animals and plants demonstrated that epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation, histone modifications and non-coding RNAs are among the molecular pathways supporting phenotypic plasticity and that epigenetic variation is used to stably adapt to different environments. Case studies revealed habitat-specific epigenetic fingerprints that were maintained over subsequent years pointing at the existence of epigenetic ecotypes. Environmentally induced epimutations and corresponding gene expression changes provide an ideal means for fast and directional adaptation to changing or new conditions, because they can synchronously alter phenotypes in many population members. Because microorganisms inclusive of human pathogens also exploit epigenetically mediated phenotypic variation for environmental adaptation, this phenomenon is considered a universal biological principle. The production of different phenotypes from the same DNA sequence in response to environmental cues by epigenetic mechanisms also provides a mechanistic explanation for the "general-purpose genotype hypothesis" and the "genetic paradox of invasions".

Keywords: DNA methylation; asexual populations; ecoepigenetics; environmental adaptation; epigenetic ecotypes; general-purpose genotype; invasion paradox; phenotypic plasticity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 2
Figure 2
Phenotypic, genetic and epigenetic differences between differently adapted populations of marbled crayfish,Procambarus virginalis. (A) Examples of strikingly different marbled crayfish habitats. From Vogt et al. [104], Tönges et al. [105,108] and Andriantsoa et al. [107]. (B) Genetic differences between representatives from several European populations as determined by whole-genome sequencing. A descendant of the oldest known marbled crayfish aquarium lineage was used as a reference. G, Germany. Adapted from Maiakovska et al. [101]. (C) Maximum body size of laboratory raised and wild specimens from Lake Moosweiher (Germany), showing 30% bigger total length (TL) in the lake. From Vogt et al. [104]. (D) Chelipeds of specimens from the laboratory and Lake Moosweiher, showing bigger and sharper spines (arrows) in the wild specimen. From Vogt et al. [104]. (E) Comparative analysis of 697 variably methylated genes in the hepatopancreas and abdominal musculature of specimens from the laboratory (L), Lake Moosweiher (M) and a rice field in Moramanga, Madagascar (Ma). The heatmap shows differences in methylation patterns between individuals, particularly in the hepatopancreas. Adapted from Tönges et al. [105]. (F) Principal component analysis of samples from the laboratory and Lake Singliser See based on the average methylation of 361 variably methylated genes, showing clear separation of the populations. Adapted from Tönges et al. [105]. (G) Differences in population structure between pond, pristine mountain river and polluted lowland river in Madagascar and an acidic lake in Germany. Adapted from Andriantsoa et al. [107] and Tönges et al. [108]. (H) Principal component analysis of methylation of 122 genes separating four populations from rivers and lakes in Madagascar and Germany. Adapted from Tönges et al. [105]. (I) Persistent DNA methylation fingerprints of populations from Andragnaro River (A), Ihosy River (I), Lake Reilinger See (R) and Lake Singliser See (S) in consecutive years (1 and 2), exemplified for a small genic region of the hepatopancreatic DNA. The samples were collected at intervals of 12–21 months and analysed with two different methods. Adapted from Tönges et al. [105].
Figure 1
Figure 1
Scheme of environmentally induced change of gene and phenotype expression by epigenetic mechanisms. Environmental signals trigger gene expression change via hormones, second messengers, and environment-sensitive DNA methylation modifying enzymes (DME) and histone modifying enzymes (HME). DNA methylation readers (DMRe), histone modification readers (HMRe) and transcription factors recruit the DMEs and HMEs to specific sites in the chromatin and DNA. Histone modifications such as acetylation (filled squares) and deacetylation (open squares) help to shape chromatin structure and access to the DNA, and methylation (filled circles) and demethylation (open circles) of CpG dinucleotides in the DNA modify gene expression, resulting in different variants of a phenotypic trait. Adapted from Vogt [9].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Variation of DNA methylation between and within differently adapted Chinese populations of clonal alligator weed,Alternanthera philoxeroides. Populations are indicated by two-letter code. The principal coordinate analysis shows samples from the field collected in subsequent years and the same samples after transfer to a common environment and then to a culture chamber. Zoom-in demonstrates that some of the DNA methylation differences between populations persisted for 10 asexual generations. Adapted from Shi et al. [116].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Genetic and epigenetic variation in genetically impoverished, sexually reproducing populations. (A) Dependence of DMRs on SNPs in CG, CHG and CHH contexts in 263 inbred genotypes of maize,Zea mays, showing that more than 60% of the epigenetic variation is uncoupled from genetic variation. Adapted from Xu et al. [119]. (B) Negative correlation of genetic and epigenetic variation in invasive populations of house sparrow,Passer domesticus, from seven Kenyan cities. Genetic variation was determined by microsatellite analysis and epigenetic diversity by MSAP.h, haplotype diversity;Ho, heterozygosity; p, probability value; r, Pearson correlation coefficient. Adapted from Vogt [33], compiled with data from Liebl et al. [120].
Figure 5
Figure 5
Scenario of speciation in asexually reproducing organisms via epigenetic phenotypes and epigenetic ecotypes. Different epigenetic ecotypes arise from a genetically uniform source population by invasion of different ecosystems, the generation of habitat-specific phenotypes by environmentally induced epigenetic changes, and the transgenerational inheritance and selection of these phenotypes. Under favourable conditions, the epigenotypes may be genetically integrated, and the epigenetic ecotypes may thus transform into classical, genetically diverse ecotypes, which can finally evolve to different species.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. DeWitt T., Scheiner S.M., editors. Phenotypic Plasticity: Functional and Conceptual Approaches. Oxford University Press; New York, NY, USA: 2004.
    1. Fusco G., Minelli A. Phenotypic plasticity in development and evolution: Facts and concepts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2010;365:547–556. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0267. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sommer R.J. Phenotypic plasticity: From theory and genetics to current and future challenges. Genetics. 2020;215:1–13. doi: 10.1534/genetics.120.303163. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pfennig D.W., editor. Phenotypic Plasticity and Evolution. Causes, Consequences, Controversies. CRC Press; Boca Raton, FL, USA: 2021. - DOI
    1. Kilvitis H.J., Hanson H., Schrey A.W., Martin L.B. Epigenetic potential as a mechanism of phenotypic plasticity in vertebrate range expansions. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2017;57:385–395. doi: 10.1093/icb/icx082. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
MDPI full text link MDPI Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp