Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Springer full text link Springer Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2023 Feb;45(1):491-505.
doi: 10.1007/s11357-022-00657-6. Epub 2022 Sep 15.

Bioenergetic and vascular predictors of potential super-ager and cognitive decline trajectories-a UK Biobank Random Forest classification study

Affiliations

Bioenergetic and vascular predictors of potential super-ager and cognitive decline trajectories-a UK Biobank Random Forest classification study

Parvin Mohammadiarvejeh et al. Geroscience.2023 Feb.

Abstract

Aging has often been characterized by progressive cognitive decline in memory and especially executive function. Yet some adults, aged 80 years or older, are "super-agers" that exhibit cognitive performance like younger adults. It is unknown if there are adults in mid-life with similar superior cognitive performance ("positive-aging") versus cognitive decline over time and if there are blood biomarkers that can distinguish between these groups. Among 1303 participants in UK Biobank, latent growth curve models classified participants into different cognitive groups based on longitudinal fluid intelligence (FI) scores over 7-9 years. Random Forest (RF) classification was then used to predict cognitive trajectory types using longitudinal predictors including demographic, vascular, bioenergetic, and immune factors. Feature ranking importance and performance metrics of the model were reported. Despite model complexity, we achieved a precision of 77% when determining who would be in the "positive-aging" group (n = 563) vs. cognitive decline group (n = 380). Among the top fifteen features, an equal number were related to either vascular health or cellular bioenergetics but not demographics like age, sex, or socioeconomic status. Sensitivity analyses showed worse model results when combining a cognitive maintainer group (n = 360) with the positive-aging or cognitive decline group. Our results suggest that optimal cognitive aging may not be related to age per se but biological factors that may be amenable to lifestyle or pharmacological changes.

Keywords: Bioenergetics; Biomarkers; Cognitive decline; Metabolism; Super-agers; Vascular.

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to American Aging Association.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The relative feature score of the top fifteen features in the Random Forest model. Colors represent different feature classes (i.e., “factor type”). For a given feature, the “I” and “II” symbols represent variables collected either at baseline or on a subsequent visit respectively. No features were multicollinear (e.g., r > 0.80)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
These partial dependence plots illustrate changes in the relationship between a given vascular feature and the probability of being either in the cognitive decline group (0–0.49) or positive-aging group (0.50–1.00). The purple dotted line signifies the 0.50 threshold distinguishing between the cognitive decline and positive-aging groups
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
These partial dependence plots illustrate changes in the relationship between a given bioenergetics feature and the probability of being either in the cognitive decline group (0–0.49) or positive-aging group (0.50–1.00). The purple dotted line signifies the 0.50 threshold distinguishing between the cognitive decline and positive-aging groups
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
These partial dependence plots illustrate changes in the relationship between the neutrophil II feature and the probability of being either in the cognitive decline group (0–0.49) or positive-aging group (0.50–1.00). The purple dotted line signifies the 0.50 threshold distinguishing between participants in the cognitive decline and positive-aging groups
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Distributions for the top fifteen features to use in the final Random Forest model, to predict positive-aging versus cognitive-decline groups. Features are aggregated by each feature class (i.e., “factor type”) for ease of interpretation of common features
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve showing the final model fit of 42 features for distinguishing between positive-ager and cognitive decliner groups. The diagonal line represents “at-chance” prediction. The “true positive rate” and “false positive rate” correspond to sensitivity and 1-specificity. AUC, area under the curve
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Dempster FN. The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Dev Rev. 1992;1;12(1):45–75. 10.1016/0273-2297(92)90003-K.
    1. Parkin AJ, Walter BM. Recollective experience, normal aging, and frontal dysfunction. Psychol Aging. 1992;7(2):290. 10.1037/0882-7974.7.2.290. - PubMed
    1. Salthouse TA. When does age-related cognitive decline begin? Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30(4):507–514. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.09.023. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh-Manoux A, Kivimaki M, Glymour MM, Elbaz A, Berr C, Ebmeier KP, Ferrie JE, Dugravot A. Timing of onset of cognitive decline: results from Whitehall II prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2012;344. 10.1136/bmj.d7622. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jensen, Arthur R. Abilities: their structure, growth, and action. Am J Psychol. 1974;290–6. 10.2307/1422024.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Springer full text link Springer Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp