Movatterモバイル変換

[0]ホーム
URL:

Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Sheridan PubFactory full text link Sheridan PubFactory Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

.2022 May 30;11(2):520-532.
doi: 10.1556/2006.2022.00035. Print 2022 Jul 13.

Neural and behavioral correlates of sexual stimuli anticipation point to addiction-like mechanisms in compulsive sexual behavior disorder

Affiliations

Neural and behavioral correlates of sexual stimuli anticipation point to addiction-like mechanisms in compulsive sexual behavior disorder

Benny Liberg et al. J Behav Addict..

Abstract

Background and aims: Compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD) is characterized by persistent patterns of failure to control sexual impulses resulting in repetitive sexual behavior, pursued despite adverse consequences. Despite previous indications of addiction-like mechanisms and the recent impulse-control disorder classification in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), the neurobiological processes underlying CSBD are unknown.

Methods: We designed and applied a behavioral paradigm aimed at disentangling processes related to anticipation and viewing of erotic stimuli. In 22 male CSBD patients (age: M = 38.7, SD = 11.7) and 20 healthy male controls (HC, age: M = 37.6, SD = 8.5), we measured behavioral responses and neural activity during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The main outcomes were response time differences between erotic and non-erotic trials and ventral striatum (VS) activity during anticipation of visual stimuli. We related these outcomes with each other, to CSBD diagnosis, and symptom severity.

Results: We found robust case-control differences on behavioral level, where CSBD patients showed larger response time differences between erotic and non-erotic trials than HC. The task induced reliable main activations within each group. While we did not observe significant group differences in VS activity, VS activity during anticipation correlated with response time differences and self-ratings for anticipation of erotic stimuli.

Discussion and conclusions: Our results support the validity and applicability of the developed task and suggest that CSBD is associated with altered behavioral correlates of anticipation, which were associated with ventral striatum activity during anticipation of erotic stimuli. This supports the idea that addiction-like mechanisms play a role in CSBD.

Keywords: anticipation; compulsive sexual behavior disorder; functional MRI; hypersexual disorder; sex addiction; sexual stimuli.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CA is employed by Quantify Research (consultancy work unrelated to the present work). The authors report no financial or other relationship relevant to the subject of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of the sexual incentive delay fMRI task. Two example trials of non-erotic control trials (top) and erotic trials (bottom) are shown. The total number of trials wasn = 80 (40 for each trial type) acquired in two sessions. Each session contained 20erotic and 20non-erotic control trials. Total task duration was approximately 24 min. The trial order was pseudo-randomized. Event durations are indicated. Event 1 grey screen (determined the inter-trial interval): random duration between 4 and 7 s. Event 2 was the anticipation phase presenting a cue symbol that indicated the type of trial, i.e., the future presentation of either an “erotic” or a “non-erotic” image (main event of interest). The meaning of each symbol was explained to the participants outside the scanner, who also performed a short practice session prior to the experiment. Event 3 (fixation cross) indicated task preparation. Event 4 target square: task requires button press. Participants were instructed to press a button as quick as possible when the square appeared and if they would respond fast enough the outcome image will be presented. The button-press task was included to keep participants alert and to assess reaction times as a proxy measure for ‘motivation to win’. Fail rate was fixed to 20%, where an image of noise was presented instead as visual stimuli (see Supplemental Materials for more details on task design). Event 5 grey screen: waiting period (random duration). In event 6, the image corresponding to the trial type was presented, i.e., either an erotic or non-erotic visual stimulus (secondary event of interest). Acquisition procedure was designed to avoid potential order effects, effects induced by symbol rotation, and habituation/conditioning effects (see Supplemental Materials). Jittering (random presentation times) of inter-stimuli durations was applied to disentangle reward anticipation from receipt or button press-related brain activation. Two contrasts were compared between CSBD patients and controls: Contrast 1 (main): Difference in brain activation between erotic and non-erotic trials during anticipation phase (event 2). Contrast 2 (secondary): Difference in brain activation between erotic and non-erotic trials during image presentation (event 6).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Behavioral results from the sexual incentive delay task performed during fMRI. The scheme demonstrated the observed trial-by-group interaction and corresponding ΔRT differences. Mean reaction time for each trial type (erotic vs. non-erotic) and group (HC vs. CSBD) are shown. ΔRT for each group is indicated (vertical arrows). Numerical values are listed in Table 2
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Within-group task-related fMRI mean activations. Corrected COPE mean activations (erotic > non-erotic) for contrast 1 (anticipation) are displayed for both healthy controls (HC, top) and CSBD patients (bottom). Z values are indicated by color (heat map). Although there are visual regional differences in activation patterns between HC and CSBD, direct group comparisons were not significant after correction (same applied to the reversed contrast HC > CSBD). Note that whole brain analyses were exploratory. Results for contrast 2 (viewing phase) and uncorrected group comparisons at a threshold ofP = 0.01 are shown in the Supplemental Materials (Figure S3–S6). Cluster statistics, MNI coordinates of activation maxima, and regional labels are provided in the Supplemental Materials Table S10 and S12
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
A: Correlation between VS activation during anticipation and ΔRT. Patient data is plotted in red, HC data in blue. Supplementary Figure S2 shows the regression plot when excluding the outlier with highest VS and lowest ΔRT. Note that we deem results including the outlier reliable (see main text and Supplemental Materials for reasoning). B: Correlation between VS activity during anticipation phase and rating of how much CSBD patients reported to look forward to viewing erotic images (asked before fMRI experiment) (r = 0.61,P = 0.002). Such correlation was not observed in controls (r = −0.221,P = 0.362; see Supplemental Materials for more details)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Adebahr, R. , Söderström, E. Z. , Arver, S. , Jokinen, J. , & Öberg, K. G. (2021). Reaching men and women at risk of committing sexual offences - findings from the National Swedish telephone helpline PrevenTell. The Journal of Sexual Medicine , 18(9), 1571–1581. 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.06.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Antons, S. , & Brand, M. (2021). Diagnostic and classification considerations related to compulsive sexual behavior disorder and problematic pornography use. Current Addiction Reports , 8(3), 452–457. 10.1007/s40429-021-00383-7. - DOI
    1. Ballester-Arnal, R. , Castro-Calvo, J. , Giménez-García, C. , Gil-Juliá, B. , & Gil-Llario, M. D. (2020). Psychiatric comorbidity in compulsive sexual behavior disorder (CSBD). Addictive Behaviors , 107, 106384. 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106384. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Balodis, I. M. , & Potenza, M. N. (2015). Anticipatory reward processing in addicted populations: A focus on the monetary incentive delay task. Biological Psychiatry , 77(5), 434–444. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.08.020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergman, H. , & Källmén, H. (2002). Alcohol use among Swedes and a psychometric evaluation of the alcohol use disorders identification test. Alcohol and Alcoholism , 37(3), 245–251. 10.1093/alcalc/37.3.245. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Related information

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Sheridan PubFactory full text link Sheridan PubFactory Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.

[8]ページ先頭
©2009-2025 Movatter.jp