Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Public Library of Science full text link Public Library of Science Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Share

.2022 Jul 6;17(7):e0268594.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268594. eCollection 2022.

Small sight-Big might: Economic impact of bird tourism shows opportunities for rural communities and biodiversity conservation

Affiliations

Small sight-Big might: Economic impact of bird tourism shows opportunities for rural communities and biodiversity conservation

Tobias Schwoerer et al. PLoS One..

Abstract

Birdwatching is considered one of the fastest growing nature-based tourism sectors in the world. Tourists who identify as birdwatchers tend to be well-educated and wealthy travellers with a specific interest in the places they visit. Birdwatchers can bring economic resources to remote communities diversifying their economies and contribute to biodiversity conservation in areas of bird habitat with global significance. Alaska plays a critical role in understanding the link between bird conservation and bird tourism as it supports the world's largest concentration of shorebirds and is a global breeding hotspot for hundreds of migratory species, including many species of conservation concern for their decline across their ranges. Alaska is also a global destination for birders due to the large congregations of birds that occur during the spring, summer and fall seasons. Despite its global importance, relatively little information exists on the significance of bird tourism in Alaska or on opportunities for community development that align with conservation. This study used ebird data to look at trends in Alaska birdwatching and applied existing information from the Alaska Visitor Statistics Program to estimate visitor expenditures and the impact of that spending on Alaska's regional economies. In 2016, nearly 300,000 birdwatchers visited Alaska and spent $378 million, supporting approximately 4,000 jobs. The study describes bird tourism's contributions to local jobs and income in remote rural and urban economies and discusses opportunities for developing and expanding the nature-based tourism sector. The study points toward the importance of partnering with rural communities and landowners to advance both economic opportunities and biodiversity conservation actions. The need for new data collection addressing niche market development and economic diversification is also discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. NABCI bird conservation regions used for economic analysis with borough and census area outlines.
Reprinted from U.S. NABCI (2020) under a CC BY license, with permission from NABCI, original copyright 2021.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Alaska’s Important Bird Areas (IBAs) and communities that are birdwatching hotspots.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. White EM, Bowker JM, Askew AE, Langner LL, Arnold JR, English DBK. Federal Outdoor Recreation Trends: Effects on Economic Opportunities. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service Northwest Pacific Research Station; 2016. Report No.: November. Available:https://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/pnw_gtr945.pdf.
    1. USFWS. 2016 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife-Associated Recreation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau; 2018. p. 144. Report No.: FHW/16-NAT. Available:https://wsfrprograms.fws.gov/Subpages/NationalSurvey/nat_survey2016.pdf.
    1. Ballantyne R, Packer J, Hughes K. Tourists’ support for conservation messages and sustainable management practices in wildlife tourism experiences. Tourism Manage. 2009;30: 658–664. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2008.11.003 - DOI
    1. Cakar K, Uzut I. A conceptual analysis of birdwatching as a nature-based tourism activity. International Symposium on Advancements in Tourism, Recreation, and Sports Sciences. 2018.
    1. Glowinski SL. BIRD-WaTChINg, ECOTOuRISm, aND ECONOmIC DEVElOPmENT: a REVIEW OF ThE EVIDENCE. 2008. [cited 29 Jun 2021]. Available:https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Avitourism-opportunities-as-a-cont....

Publication types

MeSH terms

Related information

Grants and funding

The authors received funding for the study through the Edgerton Foundation. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Public Library of Science full text link Public Library of Science Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp