Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Silverchair Information Systems full text link Silverchair Information Systems Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2022 Apr 10;14(4):evac045.
doi: 10.1093/gbe/evac045.

Genetics and Material Culture Support Repeated Expansions into Paleolithic Eurasia from a Population Hub Out of Africa

Affiliations

Genetics and Material Culture Support Repeated Expansions into Paleolithic Eurasia from a Population Hub Out of Africa

Leonardo Vallini et al. Genome Biol Evol..

Abstract

The population dynamics that followed the Out of Africa (OoA) expansion and the whereabouts of the early migrants before the differentiation that ultimately led to the formation of Oceanian, West and East Eurasian macropopulations have long been debated. Shedding light on these events may, in turn, provide clues to better understand the cultural evolution in Eurasia between 50 and 35 ka. Here, we analyze Eurasian Paleolithic DNA evidence to provide a comprehensive population model and validate it in light of available material culture. Leveraging on our integrated approach we propose the existence of a Eurasian population Hub, where Homo sapiens lived between the OoA and the broader colonization of Eurasia, which was characterized by multiple events of expansion and local extinction. A major population wave out of Hub, of which Ust'Ishim, Bacho Kiro, and Tianyuan are unadmixed representatives, is broadly associated with Initial Upper Paleolithic lithics and populated West and East Eurasia before or around 45 ka, before getting largely extinct in Europe. In this light, we suggest a parsimonious placement of Oase1 as an individual related to Bacho Kiro who experienced additional Neanderthal introgression. Another expansion, started before 38 ka, is broadly associated with Upper Paleolithic industries and repopulated Europe with sporadic admixtures with the previous wave (GoyetQ116-1) and more systematic ones, whereas moving through Siberia (Yana, Mal'ta). Before these events, we also confirm Zlatý Kůň as the most basal human lineage sequenced to date OoA, potentially representing an earlier wave of expansion out of the Hub.

Keywords: ancient DNA; material culture; molecular anthropology; paleolithic Eurasia.

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
qpGraph trees for Paleolithic Eurasia. (A) Best fit population tree that recapitulates the major population streams from an OoA Hub, colored according to the most parsimonious lithic culture affiliation (IUP or non-Mousterian/non-IUP: yellow; Initial Upper Paleolithic, IUP: red; Upper Paleolithic, UP: blue - cultural affiliation for each sample are extensively reported in Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1). See Supplementary Sections 1 and 3, Supplementary Material online for more details on the qpGraph generation and on the material culture labels. The tree proposed here is based on 71,853 SNPs due to the presence of Oase1, but its significance holds with a greater number of SNPs (303,651) when Oase1 is removed (Supplementary fig. S5C, Supplementary Material online), which also yields a nonzero branch upstream of Ust’Ishim. (B) Modern Papuans can be added as a terminal branch of the Paleolithic expansion that was associated with IUP in Eurasia. Such a tree, based on 418884 SNPs, is just one of the six acceptable possibilities we identified (Supplementary fig. S7, Supplementary Material online) and is reported here just on the basis of its parsimonious nature. Nodes labeled with “H” represent population differentiation inferred to have happened inside the population Hub OoA. Asterisks indicate genetic drift putatively occurred inside the Hub, which differentiates the West and East Eurasian genetic components.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Subsequent expansions into Eurasia from a population Hub OoA. (A) Zlatý Kůň can be described as a putative early expansion from the population formed after the major expansion OoA and hybridization with Neanderthals, and could be linked with non-Mousterian and non-IUP cultures found in Europe 48–45 ka or with IUP. (B) Representative samples dated between 45 and 40 ka across Eurasia can be ascribed to a population movement with uniform genetic features and material culture consistent with an IUP affiliation and which can also explain Oase1 after allowing for additional Neanderthal contributions; modern Papuans may be genetically seen as an extreme extension of this movement. (C) Following local genetic differentiation, a subsequent population expansion could explain the genetic components found in ancient samples <38 ka which contain it in unadmixed form (Kostenki14, Sunghir) or admixed with preexisting IUP components (Goyet Q116-1, Yana1, Mal’ta). The dates at the top right of each map provide a lower bound, based on the C14 of the earliest available sample for the inferred population wave. * indicate sites for which material culture was not available in direct association. For these sites, the nearest spatio-temporal proxies were used, as indicated in Supplementary table S1, Supplementary Material online. Numbers on the map refer to the position of relevant proxies: 1: Szeleta (S); 2: Pod_Hradem (S); 3: Moravský_Krumlov_IV (S); 4: Stranska_Skala_III-IIIc (IUP); 5: Brno-Bohunice (IUP); 6: Bacho_Kiro_IUP_layer_11 (IUP); 7: Ořechov_IV_–_Kabáty (IUP); 8: Brno-Bohunice (IUP); 9: Românesti-Dumbravita (UP); 10: Cosava (UP); 11: Tincova (UP); 12: Kara_Bom_OH_5_OH6 (IUP); 13: Tolbor-4_layer_4-5-6 (IUP); 14: Tolbor-16_layer_6 (IUP); 15: Kamenka_A (IUP); 16: Suindonggou_1 (IUP); 17: Suindonggou_2 (IUP); 18: Maisières-Canal (UP); 19: Spy_Ossiferous_Horizon_2 (UP); 20: Kostenki_12_Vokov (UP); 21: Kostenki_1 (UP).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Allen J, O’Connell J. 2014. Both half right: updating the evidence for dating first human arrivals in Sahul. Aust Archaeol. 79(1):86–108.
    1. Arrighi S, Bortolini E. et al. 2020. Backdating systematic shell ornament making in Europe to 45,000 years ago. Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 59.
    1. Arrighi S, Marciani G. et al. 2020. Between the hammerstone and the anvil: bipolar knapping and other percussive activities in the late Mousterian and the Uluzzian of Grotta Di Castelcivita (Italy). Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 12(11):1–39.
    1. Arrighi S, Moroni A. et al. 2020. Bone tools, ornaments and other unusual objects during the middle to upper palaeolithic transition in Italy. Quat Int. 551:169–187.
    1. Bataille G, Falcucci A, Tafelmaier Y, Conard NJ. 2020. Technological differences between Kostenki 17/II (Spitsynskaya industry, Central Russia) and the Protoaurignacian: Reply to Dinnis et al. (2019). J Hum Evol. 146:102685. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Silverchair Information Systems full text link Silverchair Information Systems Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp