Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Atypon full text link Atypon Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

Retracted article

See the retraction notice
.2021 Nov 9:8:23333928211053965.
doi: 10.1177/23333928211053965. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.

A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Emergency Room Utilization Following Mifepristone Chemical and Surgical Abortions, 1999-2015

Affiliations

A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Emergency Room Utilization Following Mifepristone Chemical and Surgical Abortions, 1999-2015

James Studnicki et al. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol..

Retraction in

  • Retraction Notice.
    [No authors listed][No authors listed]Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2024 Feb 5;11:23333928231216699. doi: 10.1177/23333928231216699. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2024.PMID:38328416Free PMC article.

Expression of concern in

Abstract

Introduction: Existing research on postabortion emergency room visits is sparse and limited by methods which underestimate the incidence of adverse events following abortion. Postabortion emergency room (ER) use since Food and Drug Administration approval of chemical abortion in 2000 can identify trends in the relative morbidity burden of chemical versus surgical procedures.

Objective: To complete the first longitudinal cohort study of postabortion emergency room use following chemical and surgical abortions.

Methods: A population-based longitudinal cohort study of 423 000 confirmed induced abortions and 121,283 subsequent ER visits occurring within 30 days of the procedure, in the years 1999-2015, to Medicaid-eligible women over 13 years of age with at least one pregnancy outcome, in the 17 states which provided public funding for abortion.

Results: ER visits are at greater risk to occur following a chemical rather than a surgical abortion: all ER visits (OR 1.22, CL 1.19-1.24); miscoded spontaneous (OR 1.88, CL 1.81-1.96); and abortion-related (OR 1.53, CL 1.49-1.58). ER visit rates per 1000 abortions grew faster for chemical abortions, and by 2015, chemical versus surgical rates were 354.8 versus 357.9 for all ER visits; 31.5 versus 8.6 for miscoded spontaneous abortion visits; and 51.7 versus 22.0 for abortion-related visits. Abortion-related visits as a percent of total visits are twice as high for chemical abortions, reaching 14.6% by 2015. Miscoded spontaneous abortion visits as a percent of total visits are nearly 4 times as high for chemical abortions, reaching 8.9% of total visits and 60.9% of abortion-related visits by 2015.

Conclusion: The incidence and per-abortion rate of ER visits following any induced abortion are growing, but chemical abortion is consistently and progressively associated with more postabortion ER visit morbidity than surgical abortion. There is also a distinct trend of a growing number of women miscoded as receiving treatment for spontaneous abortion in the ER following a chemical abortion.

Keywords: Medicaid; emergency room; induced abortion; medical abortion; mifepristone.

© The Author(s) 2021.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Medicaid abortions (surgical and chemical), 1999–2015, and chemical abortion % total.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Emergency room (ER) use following surgical abortion, 1999-2015.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Emergency room (ER) use following chemical abortion, 1999–2015.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Abortion-related visits as a percent of all emergency room (ER) visits.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Miscoded spontaneous abortion visits as a percent of all emergency room (ER) visits.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Miscoded spontaneous abortion visits as a percent of abortion-related emergency room (ER) visits.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Total emergency room (ER) visits per 1000 abortions.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Miscoded spontaneous abortion emergency room (ER) visits per 1000 abortions.
Figure 9.
Figure 9.
Abortion-related emergency room (ER) visits per 1000 abortions.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Longbons T. U.S. abortion trends: 2019 and preliminary 2020. Charlotte Lozier Institute. American Reports Series Issue 19, September 2021. Accessed September 10, 2021.https://lozierinstitute.org/us-abortion-trends-2019-and-preliminary-2020/
    1. U.S. Government Accountability Office. Food and Drug Administration: Information on mifeprex labeling changes and ongoing monitoring efforts. GAO-18-292. Published March 28, 2018. Accessed September 9, 2021.
    1. Niinimäki M, Pouta A, Bloigu A, et al. Immediate complications after medical compared with surgical termination of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(4):795-804. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b5ccf9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carlsson I, Breding K, Larsson P-G. Complications related to induced abortion: a combined retrospective and longitudinal follow-up study. BMC Women's Health. 2018;18(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0645-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cleland K, Creinin MD, Nucatola D, Nshom M, Trussell J. Significant adverse events and outcomes after medical abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(1):166-171. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e3182755763 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Atypon full text link Atypon Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp