Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2021 Oct:86:102477.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2021.102477.

Using learning profiles to inform education priorities: An editors' overview of the Special Issue

Affiliations

Using learning profiles to inform education priorities: An editors' overview of the Special Issue

Luis Crouch et al. Int J Educ Dev.2021 Oct.

Abstract

This special issue explores the use of learning profiles for analysing the dynamics of low learning in low- and middle-income countries and informing priorities to address the learning crisis. The 12 papers in the special issue draw on learning data from more than 50 countries and 6 million individuals, with implications for education policy and practice. Taken together, they point to a need to steepen learning trajectories by prioritizing early mastery of foundational skills for all children. The papers show that addressing the learning crisis will not be achieved through more school grade attainment alone, nor through within-country equality across groups (such as girls and boys or rich and poor). Positive examples show that programs focused on foundational learning both improved average learning and reduced inequality. Addressing the learning crisis will require a focus on systems improvement, using foundational learning as a case in point for making the needed systems improvements to steepen learning throughout children's time in school. Learning profiles can provide a guide for education actors aiming to improve learning outcomes.

Keywords: Education systems; Foundational skills; Inequality; Learning crisis; Learning profiles.

© 2021 The Authors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Learning profiles for foundational numeracy skills in Indonesia flattened after grade 6, and learning profiles were lower in 2014 than in 2000.Note: Standardized numeracy score (rescaled to have a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 100 for grade 1 students in 2000; scores are in terms of grade 1 (in 2000) standard deviations) in 2000 and 2014 by grade level completed (for enrolled children) or grade level they would have completed (for all enrolled and unenrolled children), using the Indonesia Family Life Surveys (IFLS) data. Between grades 6 and 12 enrolled students gain only 0.2 standard deviations.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Learning profiles in Punjab, Pakistan, reveal convergence between initially low and high performers in later primary school.Note: This figure shows learning trajectories by groups of baseline levels of test score performance during Grade 3–6 using the unbalanced full sample but restricting the graph for those who were observed in Grade 3 (2003). The graph shows averaged test scores across the three subjects tested for children at different test scores levels in 2003.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
At age 10, even among the top 20 % by SES, less than 60 % of children have achieved basic numeracy in India and Kenya.Note: Learning profiles show percent of children at each age demonstrating grade 2 numeracy proficiency, based on ASER and Uwezo data.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
In going from low to middle performance the percentage of children in the two lowest performance levels change the most: dropping from 90 % to just 25 %.Note: Percent of children by proficiency level, PISA 2015 mathematics. The red line shows the percentage of children at each level of performance, from lowest (1) to highest (7), for the three countries that have the lowest average performance; the green line shows the same thing for the three countries with middle average performance, and the blue line shows the same thing for the three countries with the highest average performance.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Girls’ basic education, which includes both schooling and literacy, has much larger associations with life outcomes than schooling alone.Note: Mean random-effects weighted meta-analysis results from instrumental variables regressions using Demographic and Health Surveys data from 54 countries and 128 survey rounds and Financial Inclusion Insights data from 10 countries. “Schooling alone” is the regression coefficient on years of schooling scaled by 6 to represent primary schooling; “basic education” is the linear combination of the scaled schooling coefficient and a scaled reading coefficient that represent completing primary schooling and going from not being able to read to reading a simple sentence (DHS) or passage (FII) without help.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Akmal M., Pritchett L. Learning equity requires more than equality: learning goals and achievement gaps between the rich and the poor in five developing countries. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 2021;82 (this issue) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Asadullah M.N., Chaudhury N. 2014. Primary Schooling, Student Learning, and School Quality in Rural Bangladesh. Center for Global Development Working paper, 349.
    1. Asim M. Average vs. distributional effects: evidence from an experiment in Rwanda. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 2021;79 (this issue)
    1. Atuhurra J., Kaffenberger M. 2020. System (In)Coherence: Quantifying the Alignment of Primary Education Curriculum Standards, Examinations, and Instruction in Two East African Countries. RISE Working paper. 20/057.
    1. Bau N., Das J., Chang A.Y. New evidence on learning trajectories in a low-income setting. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 2021;84 (this issue) - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp