Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2018 Feb:26:101-110.
doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 23.

Deforestation and vector-borne disease: Forest conversion favors important mosquito vectors of human pathogens

Affiliations

Deforestation and vector-borne disease: Forest conversion favors important mosquito vectors of human pathogens

Nathan D Burkett-Cadena et al. Basic Appl Ecol.2018 Feb.

Abstract

The global burden of vector-borne diseases accounts for more than 17% of infectious diseases in humans. Rapid global expansion of previously obscure pathogens, such as Zika and chikungunya viruses in recent years highlights the importance of understanding how anthropogenic changes influence emergence and spillover of vector-borne diseases. Deforestation has been identified as one anthropogenic change that influences vector-borne disease prevalence, although contrasting pictures of the effects of deforestation on vector-borne disease transmission have been reported. These conflicting findings are likely attributable to the inherent complexity of vector-borne disease systems, which involve diverse groups of vectors, hosts and pathogens, depending on geography. The current study represents a quantitative exploration of the link between deforestation and mosquitoes, the most important common constituents of vector-borne disease systems. Analysis of data compiled from published field studies for 87 mosquito species from 12 countries revealed that about half of the species (52.9%) were associated with deforested habitats. Of these species that are favored by deforestation, a much larger percentage (56.5%) are confirmed vectors of human pathogens, compared to those negatively impacted by deforestation (27.5%). Moreover, species that serve as vectors of multiple human pathogens were all favored by deforestation, includingAnopheles bancroftii, Anopheles darlingi, Anopheles farauti, Anopheles funestus s.l.,Anopheles gambiae s.l.,Anopheles subpictus, Aedes aegypti, Aedes vigilax, Culex annulirostris, andCulex quinquefasciatus. Our quantitative analysis of vector and non-vector species, demonstrates that the net effect of deforestation favors mosquitoes that serve as vectors of human disease, while the obverse holds true for non-vectors species. These results begin to unify our understanding of the relationship between deforestation and vector mosquitoes, an important step in quantifying how land use change, specifically deforestation, affects human risk of vector-borne disease.

Keywords: Deforestation; Habitat; Land use; Landscape; Mosquito; Vector.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Map showing global distribution of forest biomes and locations of field data summarized in the current study. Forest distributions from Potapov et al. (2008).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Association of 87 mosquito species with forested and deforested habitats. Data are compiled from 17 published studies from 12 countries, reported in Appendix A in Supplementary material. Positive IOC-values indicate higher abundances in deforested habitats. Bars represent average index of change (IOC) and associated standard error. Asterisks denote species for which abundance is greater than no change (Ho = 0) as determined by Student’s t-test. The symbol † denotes species for which only one observation was available.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Afrane YA, Zhou G, Lawson BW, Githeko AK, & Yan G (2006). Effects of microclimatic changes caused by deforestation on the survivorship and reproductive fitness of Anopheles gambiae in western Kenya highlands. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 74(5), 772–778. - PubMed
    1. Afrane YA, Zhou G, Lawson BW, Githeko AK, & Yan G (2007). Life-table analysis of Anopheles arabiensis in western Kenya highlands: Effects of land covers on larval and adult survivorship. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 77(4), 660–666. - PubMed
    1. Amerasinghe PH, & Amerasinghe FP (1999). Multiple host feeding in field populations of Anopheles culifacies and An. subpictus in Sri Lanka. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 13(2), 124–131. - PubMed
    1. Amerasinghe FP, & Ariyasena TG (1990). Larval survey of surface water-breeding mosquitoes during irrigation development in the Mahaweli Project, Sri Lanka. Journal of Medical Entomology, 27(5), 789–802. - PubMed
    1. Andrews ES, Schoeler GB, Gozalo AS, Carbajal F, Lopez-Sifuentes V, & Turell MJ (2014). Species diversity, seasonal, and spatial distribution of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) captured in Aotus monkey-baited traps in a forested site near Iquitos, Peru. Journal of Medical Entomology, 51(6), 1127–1135. - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp