Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Silverchair Information Systems full text link Silverchair Information Systems Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2021 Jun 30;288(1953):20210617.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0617. Epub 2021 Jun 16.

Age and sex influence social interactions, but not associations, within a killer whale pod

Affiliations

Age and sex influence social interactions, but not associations, within a killer whale pod

Michael N Weiss et al. Proc Biol Sci..

Abstract

Social structure is a fundamental aspect of animal populations. In order to understand the function and evolution of animal societies, it is important to quantify how individual attributes, such as age and sex, shape social relationships. Detecting these influences in wild populations under natural conditions can be challenging, especially when social interactions are difficult to observe and broad-scale measures of association are used as a proxy. In this study, we use unoccupied aerial systems to observe association, synchronous surfacing, and physical contact within a pod of southern resident killer whales (Orcinus orca). We show that interactions do not occur randomly between associated individuals, and that interaction types are not interchangeable. While age and sex did not detectably influence association network structure, both interaction networks showed significant social homophily by age and sex, and centrality within the contact network was higher among females and young individuals. These results suggest killer whales exhibit interesting parallels in social bond formation and social life histories with primates and other terrestrial social mammals, and demonstrate how important patterns can be missed when using associations as a proxy for interactions in animal social network studies.

Keywords: Orcinus orca; UAS; centrality; homophily; social life history; social network.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Observing killer whale social interactions using UAS. (a,b) The aircraft is flown over focal killer whale subgroups (a). All individuals detected simultaneously were considered to be associated, and both synchronous surfacing and physical contact interactions were recorded between identified individuals (b). (c,d) Example video stills of synchronous surfacing between individuals J36 and J47 (c) and physical contact between individuals J44 and J53 (d). Killer whale side profiles based on illustration by Chris Huh, used under a CC BY-SA 3.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/). (Online version in colour.)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Network structure and social centrality in a resident killer whale pod. Panels show sociograms (top) and eigenvector centrality measures (bottom) for (from left to right) association, synchronous surfacing, and physical contact networks. Edge thicknesses in the sociograms are proportional to association or interaction rate, and nodes are placed according to the ForceAtlas2 algorithm [34]. Across all plots, node shape indicates sex and node colour indicates matriline membership, and node size in the sociograms indicates individual age (as shown in the legend). Note the log scale for they-axis in the lower plots. (Online version in colour.)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Machanda ZP, Rosati AG. 2020. Shifting sociality during primate ageing. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20190620. ( 10.1098/rstb.2019.0620) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gerber L, et al. 2019. Affiliation history and age similarity predict alliance formation in adult male bottlenose dolphins. Behav. Ecol. 31, 361-370. ( 10.1093/beheco/arz195) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kurvers RHJM, Krause J, Croft DP, Wilson ADM, Wolf M. 2014. The evolutionary and ecological consequences of animal social networks: emerging issues. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 326-335. ( 10.1016/j.tree.2014.04.002) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brent LJN, Lehmann J, Ramos-Fernandez G. 2011. Social network analysis in the study of nonhuman primates: a historical perspective. Am. J. Primatol. 73, 720-730. ( 10.1002/ajp.20949) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Webber QMR, Vander Wal E. 2019. Trends and perspectives on the use of animal social network analysis in behavioural ecology: a bibliometric approach. Anim. Behav. 149, 77-87. ( 10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.01.010) - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Silverchair Information Systems full text link Silverchair Information Systems Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp