Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
Thehttps:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

NIH NLM Logo
Log inShow account info
Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
pubmed logo
Advanced Clipboard
User Guide

Full text links

Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Full text links

Actions

.2021 Apr 27:15:120-126.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2021.04.012. eCollection 2021 Aug.

Distribution, prevalence and intensity of moose nose bot fly (Cephenemyia ulrichii) larvae in moose (Alces alces) from Norway

Affiliations

Distribution, prevalence and intensity of moose nose bot fly (Cephenemyia ulrichii) larvae in moose (Alces alces) from Norway

Christer M Rolandsen et al. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl..

Abstract

High host density combined with climate change may lead to invasion of harmful parasites in cervid (host) populations. Bot flies (Diptera: Oestridae) are a group of ectoparasites that may have strong impact on their hosts, but data on the current distribution, prevalence and intensity of the moose nose bot fly (Cephenemyia ulrichii) in Scandinavia are lacking. We estimated prevalence and intensity of nose bot fly larvae in 30 moose from southern and 79 moose from central Norway. All larvae detected were identified as the moose nose bot fly. We found surprisingly high prevalence in these areas, which are up to 1300 km south-southwest of the first published location in Norway and west of the distribution in Sweden. Prevalence (0.44-1.00) was higher in areas with higher moose density. Parasite intensity in hunter killed moose was higher in central Norway (mean 5.7) than southern Norway (mean 2.9), and in both regions higher in calves and yearlings than adults. Fallen moose had higher parasite intensity (mean 9.8) compared to hunter killed moose in the subsample from central Norway, suggesting a link to host condition or behavior. Our study provides evidence of parasite range expansion, and establishing monitoring appears urgent to better understand impact on host populations.

Keywords: Cephenemyia; Distribution; Intensity; Moose population density; Parasites; Prevalence.

© 2021 The Authors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Image 1
Graphical abstract
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study areas in southern (Oslo, Aurskog-Høland and Kongsvinger) and central Norway (Selbu, Tydal, Malvik, Stjørdal and Meråker) with location and moose density (moose density, seeMaterials and methods) in sampling municipalities. Red filled circle indicate where the moose nose bot fly (Cephenemyia ulrichii) was first found in Norway, and open circles show where moose heads were examined without detection of the moose nose bot fly in 1987 (Nilssen and Haugerud, 1994). Blue circles indicate where the moose nose bot fly were found in Sweden in the late 1970s and 1980s (Steen et al., 1988). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The predicted infection prevalence of moose nose bot fly larvae with increasing moose (host) density. The shaded area shows the 95% confidence interval. Predictions from the highest ranked model with moose density. In the plot we used the function “jitter” in the R package ggeffects (Lüdecke, 2018), which adds small random variation to the data points to better reflect the amount of data for moose densities. Hence, the points do not reflect exact values as they are binomial.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The predicted parasite intensity of moose nose bot fly larvae for harvested calves (red), yearlings (blue) and adult (green) moose in central and southern Norway. Predictions from the highest ranked intensity model with study area and age group. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Anderson J.R. The behavior of nose bot flies (Cephenemyia apicata and C. jellisoni) when attacking black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus) and the resulting reactions of the deer. Can. J. Zool. 1975;53:977–992. - PubMed
    1. Anderson J.R., Nilssen A.C., Folstad I. Mating-behavior and thermoregulation of the reindeer warble fly, Hypoderma tarandi L (Diptera, Oestridae) J. Insect Behav. 1994;7:679–706.
    1. Anderson R.M., May R.M. Regulation and stability of host-parasite population interactions: I. Regulatory processes. J. Anim. Ecol. 1978;47:219–247.
    1. Angulo-Valadez C.E., Ascencio F., Jacquiet P., Dorchies P., Cepeda-Palacios R. Sheep and goat immune responses to nose bot infestation: a review. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2011;25:117–125. - PubMed
    1. Barton K. Mu-MIn: multi-model inference. 2009.http://R-Forge.R-project.org/projects/mumin/ R Package Version 0.12.2/r18.

LinkOut - more resources

Full text links
Elsevier Science full text link Elsevier Science Free PMC article
Cite
Send To

NCBI Literature Resources

MeSHPMCBookshelfDisclaimer

The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.


[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp